计算机应用 ›› 2015, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (7): 2077-2082.DOI: 10.11772/j.issn.1001-9081.2015.07.2077

• 行业与领域应用 • 上一篇    下一篇

特征滞后计算的股市波动预测

姚宏亮, 李大光, 李俊照   

  1. 合肥工业大学 计算机与信息学院, 合肥 230009
  • 收稿日期:2015-02-10 修回日期:2015-03-29 出版日期:2015-07-10 发布日期:2015-07-17
  • 通讯作者: 李大光(1989-),男,安徽明光人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向:人工智能、知识工程,1065442573@qq.com
  • 作者简介:姚宏亮(1972-),男,安徽桐城人,副教授,博士,主要研究方向:人工智能、知识工程; 李俊照(1975-),男,安徽桐城人,讲师,博士研究生,主要研究方向:机器学习、人工智能。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金资助项目(61175051,61070131,61175033)。

Stock market volatility forecast based on calculation of characteristic hysteresis

YAO Hongliang, LI Daguang, LI Junzhao   

  1. School of Computer and Information, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei Anhui 230009, China
  • Received:2015-02-10 Revised:2015-03-29 Online:2015-07-10 Published:2015-07-17

摘要:

针对股票价格波动拐点难以有效预测导致预测精度不高的问题,提出一种特征滞后程度计算的均值门限广义自回归条件异方差(LRD-TGARCH-M)模型。首先,基于股价波动与指标变化出现的不一致性,给出了滞后性的定义,并引入能量波动概念,从能量角度提出特征滞后程度(LD)计算模型;然后,用LD度量拐点出现之前的风险大小,将其加入到股价均值方程中,克服均值门限广义自回归条件异方差(TGARCH-M)模型对拐点预测的不足;其次,根据拐点附近波动相对剧烈,将LD加入到误差项的方差方程中,优化方差的变化,提高模型的预测精度;最后,给出了LRD-TGARCH-M模型的波动预测公式和精度分析,并在股票数据上进行实验,结果表明,与TGARCH-M模型相比,精确度提高了3.76%;与均值指数GARCH(EGARCH-M)模型相比,精确度提高了3.44%,证明了LRD-TGARCH-M模型可以提高股价走势预测精度,减小误差。

关键词: 股价波动, 特征滞后, 能量性, 波动风险, 门限广义自回归条件异方差模型

Abstract:

Focusing on the issue that the inflection points are hard to forecast in stock price volatility degrades the forecast accuracy, a kind of Lag Risk Degree Threshold Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedastic in Mean (LRD-TGARCH-M) model was proposed. Firstly, hysteresis was defined based on the inconsistency phenomenon of stock price volatility and index volatility, and the Lag Degree (LD) calculation model was proposed through the energy volatility of the stock. Then the LD was used to measure the risk, and put into the average share price equation in order to overcome the Threshold Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedastic in Mean (TGARCH-M) model's deficiency for predicting inflection points. Then the LD was put into the variance equation according to the drastic volatility near the inflection points, for the purpose of optimizing the change of variance and improving the forecast accuracy. Finally, the volatility forecasting formulas and accuracy analysis of the LRD-TGARCH-M algorithm were given out. The experimental results from Shanghai Stock, show that the forecast accuracy increases by 3.76% compared with the TGARCH-M model and by 3.44% compared with the Exponential Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedastic in Mean (EGARCH-M) model, which proves the LRD-TGARCH-M model can degrade the errors in the price volatility forecast.

Key words: price volatility, characteristic hysteresis, energy characteristic, fluctuation risk, Threshold Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedastic in Mean (TGARCH-M) model

中图分类号: