基于双阈值约束容差优势关系的评价模型

doi:10.11772/j.issn.1001-9081.2016.11.3131

计算机应用 ›› 2016, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (11): 3131-3135.DOI: 10.11772/j.issn.1001-9081.2016.11.3131

基于双阈值约束容差优势关系的评价模型

余顺坤, 闫泓序

华北电力大学经济与管理学院, 北京 102206

收稿日期:2016-04-18 修回日期:2016-07-03 出版日期:2016-11-10 发布日期:2016-11-12
通讯作者: 闫泓序
作者简介:余顺坤(1963-),男,江苏宜兴人,教授,博士生导师,博士,主要研究方向:技术经济及管理、企业管理;闫泓序(1989-),女,吉林长春人,博士研究生,主要研究方向:管理决策、企业管理、技术经济及管理。

Evaluation model based on dual-threshold constrained tolerance dominance relation

YU Shunkun, YAN Hongxu

College of Economics and Management, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China

Received:2016-04-18 Revised:2016-07-03 Online:2016-11-10 Published:2016-11-12

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对序信息系统下经典优势关系粗糙集在求解优势类时对于属性值的要求过于严格，导致评价模型失效，而单阈值约束容差优势关系粗糙集对于属性个数的要求又过于宽松，造成评价结果无法容纳人的感知和判断这一问题，提出一种基于双阈值约束容差优势关系的粗糙评价模型。首先，提出双阈值约束容差优势关系的基本概念并对其相关性质予以研究；然后，基于此拓展的优势关系给出优势度的定义，并结合统计分析方法构建基于双阈值约束容差优势关系的粗糙评价模型；最后，将该模型应用于我国区域建筑业综合实力评价中，并将所得结果与原通过经典优势关系粗集法得到的排序结果进行对比分析。结果表明基于双阈值约束容差优势关系的粗糙评价模型在解决多属性决策问题方面更加合理、可靠。

关键词: 序信息系统, 阈值约束, 容差优势关系, 粗糙评价模型, 建筑业综合实力评价

Abstract: Considering the problems that classical dominance relation rough set is too strict about attribute values in solving the dominant class which may lead to the failure of the evaluation model, and single-threshold constrained tolerance dominance relation rough set was too loose about attribute number which may cause inconsistency between the evaluation results and human cognitive judgment in the ordered information system, a rough evaluation model based on dual-threshold constraint tolerance relation was proposed. Firstly, the concept of dual-threshold constrained tolerance dominance relation was proposed and its relevant properties were studied. Then, based on the extended dominance relation, the definition of dominant degree was proposed and a rough evaluation model was built by using statistical analysis method. Finally, the model was applied to the comprehensive strength evaluation of the regional building industry and the sorting results were verified in comparison with the results by using classical dominance relation rough set. According to the results, the proposed model presents more rationality and high efficiency in multi-attribute decision issues.

Key words: ordered information system, threshold limitation, tolerance dominance relation, rough evaluation model, comprehensive strength evaluation of building industry

中图分类号:

余顺坤, 闫泓序. 基于双阈值约束容差优势关系的评价模型[J]. 计算机应用, 2016, 36(11): 3131-3135.

YU Shunkun, YAN Hongxu. Evaluation model based on dual-threshold constrained tolerance dominance relation[J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2016, 36(11): 3131-3135.

参考文献

[1] PAWLAK Z. Rough sets[J]. International Journal of Computer and Information Science, 1982, 11(5):341-356.
[2] 安利平,陈增强,袁著祉.基于粗集理论的多属性决策分析[J]. 控制与决策,2005,20(3):294-298.(AN L P, CHEN Z Q, YUAN Z Z. Multi-attribute decision analysis based on rough set theory[J]. Control and Decision, 2005, 20(3):294-298.)
[3] GRECO S, MATARAZZO B, SLOWINSKI R. Rough approximation of a preference relation by dominance relations[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1999, 117(1):63-83.
[4] GRECO S, MATARAZZO B, SLOWINSKI R. Rough approximation by dominance relations[J]. International Journal of Intelligent System, 2002, 17(2):153-171.
[5] GRECO S, MATARAZZO B, SLOWINSKI R. Dominance-based rough set approach to case-based reasoning[C]//Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Modeling Decisions for Artificial Intelligence. Heidelberg:Springer-Verlag, 2006:7-18.
[6] 骆公志,杨晓江.变精度优势粗糙集属性约简择优算法[J].中国管理科学,2009,17(2):169-175.(LUO G Z, YANG X J. An algorithm to choose reduction of attributes of variable precision dominance rough sets[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2009, 17(2):169-175.)
[7] 菅利荣,刘思峰,方志耕,等.基于优势粗糙集的教学研究型大学学科建设绩效评价[J].管理工程学报,2007,21(3):132-136.(JIAN L R, LIU S F, FANG Z G, et al. The performance evaluation on discipline construction of teaching and research university based on dominance rough set theory[J]. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 2007, 21(3):132-136.)
[8] YANG X, QI Y, YU D J. α-dominance relation and rough sets in interval-valued information systems[J]. Information Sciences, 2015, 294(5):334-347.
[9] 陈万翠,吕跃进,翁世洲.基于容差优势关系的排序方法及其应用[J].计算机应用,2014,34(8):2170-2174.(CHEN W C, LYU Y J, WENG S Z. Sorting method and its application based on tolerance dominance relation[J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2014, 34(8):2170-2174.)
[10] KADZINSKI M, GRECO S, SLOWINSKI R. Robust ordinal regression for dominance-based rough set approach to multiple criteria sorting[J]. Information Sciences, 2014, 283:211-228.
[11] 戴毓,周德群.基于粗糙集理论的格序选择方法[J].中国管理科学,2007,15(6):105-110.(DAI Y, ZHOU D Q. A method of lattice-order selection based on rough sets theory[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2007, 15(6):105-110.)
[12] 徐伟华,张先韬,王巧荣.基于包含度的变精度模糊粗糙集[J].计算机科学,2011,38(9):230-233.(XU W H, ZHANG X T, WANG Q R. Variable precision fuzzy rough set based on inclusion degree[J]. Computer Science, 2011, 38(9):230-233.)
[13] 张文修,仇国芳.基于粗糙集的不确定决策[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2005:25-28.(ZHANG W X, QIU G F. Uncertain Decision Making based on Rough Set[M]. Beijing:Tsinghua University Press, 2005:25-28.)
[14] 张文修,梁怡,吴伟志.信息系统与知识发现[M].北京:科学出版社,2003:75-80.(ZHANG W X, LIANG Y, WU W Z. Information Systems and Knowledge Discovery[M]. Beijing:Science Press, 2003:75-80.)
[15] 刘贵文,邓飞,王曼.中国建筑产业竞争力评价研究[J].土木工程学报,2011,44(7):157-164.(LIU G W, DENG F, WANG M. Industrial competitiveness assessment for Chinese construction industry[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2011, 44(7):157-164.)
[16] 姜连馥,石永威,满杰.基于模糊粗糙集理论的建筑业综合评价[J].大连理工大学学报,2007,47(5):729-734.(JIANG L F, SHI Y W, MAN J. Comprehensive evaluation of building industry based on fuzzy aggregation and rough set theory[J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2007, 47(5):729-734.)

基于双阈值约束容差优势关系的评价模型

Evaluation model based on dual-threshold constrained tolerance dominance relation

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	平凡, 汤小春, 潘彦宇, 李战怀. 不规则任务在图形处理器集群上的调度策略[J]. 《计算机应用》唯一官方网站, 2021, 41(11): 3295-3301.
[2]	雷鹰, 郑万波, 魏嵬, 夏云霓, 李晓波, 刘诚武, 谢洪. 基于概率性能感知演化博弈策略的“云+边”混合环境中任务卸载方法[J]. 《计算机应用》唯一官方网站, 2021, 41(11): 3302-3308.
[3]	乔钢柱, 王瑞, 孙超利. 基于分解的高维多目标改进进化算法[J]. 《计算机应用》唯一官方网站, 2021, 41(11): 3097-3103.
[4]	邹复民, 罗思杰, 陈志辉, 廖律超. 基于轨迹数据的出租车交接班时空分布识别方法[J]. 《计算机应用》唯一官方网站, 2021, 41(11): 3376-3384.
[5]	肖智豪胡志华朱琳. 求解冷链物流时间依赖型车辆路径问题的混合自适应大邻域搜索算法[J]. 计算机应用, 0, (): 0-0.
[6]	沙林秀，聂凡，高倩，孟号. 基于布朗运动与梯度信息的交替优化算法[J]. 计算机应用, 0, (): 0-0.
[7]	董永峰孙跃华高立超韩鹏季海鹏. 基于改进一维卷积和双向长短期记忆神经网络的故障诊断方法[J]. 计算机应用, 0, (): 0-0.
[8]	李大海刘庆腾艾志刚王振东. 基于动态D向分割和混沌扰动的阴阳对算法[J]. 计算机应用, 0, (): 0-0.
[9]	朱诚潘旭华张勇. 基于趋化校正的哈里斯鹰优化算法[J]. 计算机应用, 0, (): 0-0.
[10]	杨杰张名扬芮晓彬王志晓. 融合节点覆盖范围和结构洞的影响力最大化算法[J]. 计算机应用, 0, (): 0-0.
[11]	汤安迪, 韩统, 徐登武, 谢磊. 混沌精英哈里斯鹰优化算法[J]. 计算机应用, 2021, 41(8): 2265-2272.
[12]	李蒙蒙, 秦伟, 刘艺, 刁兴春. 结合头脑风暴优化的混合蚁群优化算法[J]. 计算机应用, 2021, 41(8): 2412-2417.
[13]	张闻强, 邢征, 杨卫东. 基于多区域采样策略的混合粒子群优化求解多目标柔性作业车间调度问题[J]. 计算机应用, 2021, 41(8): 2249-2257.
[14]	张祥飞, 鲁宇明, 张平生. 基于协同进化的约束多目标优化算法[J]. 计算机应用, 2021, 41(7): 2012-2018.
[15]	张萌, 李维华. 用户互动表示下的影响力最大化算法[J]. 计算机应用, 2021, 41(7): 1964-1969.