全变分的分块小波阈值图像去噪

计算机应用 ›› 2012, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (05): 1289-1292.

全变分的分块小波阈值图像去噪

高媛媛¹,刁永峰¹,边赟²

1. 西华师范大学计算机学院,四川南充 637002
2. 四川大学计算机学院,成都 610064

收稿日期:2011-11-14 修回日期:2012-01-14 发布日期:2012-05-01 出版日期:2012-05-01
通讯作者: 高媛媛
作者简介:高媛媛(1985－)，女，河南商丘人，硕士研究生,主要研究方向：数字图像处理、模式识别；刁永锋(1963－)，男，四川南部人，教授，主要研究方向：图形图像处理；边赟(1988-)，女，甘肃敦煌人，硕士研究生，主要研究方向：图像处理。
基金资助:
教育部留学回国人员启动基金资助项目（20091341-11-3）;四川省科技厅应用基础研究项目（05JY029-093）

Block wavelet threshold image denoising on total variation

GAO Yuan-yuan¹,DIAO Yong-feng¹,BIAN Yun²

1. Computer School, China West Normal University, Nanchong Sichuan 637002,China
2. School of Computer Science, Sichuan University，Chengdu Sichuan 610064,China

Received:2011-11-14 Revised:2012-01-14 Online:2012-05-01 Published:2012-05-01
Contact: GAO Yuan-yuan

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对全变分算法对平滑区域抑噪不充分及小波阈值算法易造成边缘模糊的缺陷，提出了全变分的分块小波阈值算法。首先利用全变分粗去噪算法对含噪图像去除幅度较大的噪声，再利用分块小波阈值算法抑制残余噪声。实验结果表明，在图像边缘得到保护的同时较好地抑制了平坦区域的残余噪声，与传统算法相比，峰值信噪比和视觉效果都得到明显提高。

关键词: 全变分, 分块, 阈值去噪, 模糊边缘, 残余噪声

Abstract: Traditional total variation algorithm of denoising could result in large residual noise in the smooth area and wavelet threshold algorithms could lead to some blurry edges. In view of these disadvantages, a new algorithm of block wavelet threshold image denosing on total variation was proposed. Firstly, this algorithm used total variation algorithm to denoise roughly, which eliminated noise in significant amplitude. Secondly, this algorithm used block wavelet threshold algorithm to eliminate the large residual noise in the smooth area. The experimental results show that the algorithm suppresses residual noise and protects edge effectively. Compared with traditional methods, both the peak signal-to-noise ratio and visual effects have been improved obviously.

Key words: total variation, block, threshold denoising, blurry edge, residue noise

中图分类号:

TP394.41

高媛媛刁永峰边赟. 全变分的分块小波阈值图像去噪[J]. 计算机应用, 2012, 32(05): 1289-1292.

GAO Yuan-yuan DIAO Yong-feng BIAN Yun. Block wavelet threshold image denoising on total variation[J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2012, 32(05): 1289-1292.

参考文献

［1］QIU P H, MUKHERJEE P S. Edge structure preserving image denoising［J］. Signal Processing, 2010, 90(10): 2851-2862.

［2］MUSTAFFA I, TRENADO C, SCHWERDTFEGER K, et al. Denoising of single-trial matrix representations using 2D nonlinear diffusion filtering ［J］. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 2010, 185(2): 284-292.

［3］QI D W, YANG X， ZHOU Y Y. Denoising method of wood defect images based on wavelet packet combined with gray-scale morphological filtering ［J］. Key Engineering Materials， 2011，480/481: 153-158.

［4］YU H C, ZHAO L, WANG H X. Image denoising using trivariate shrinkage filter in the wavelet domain and joint bilateral filter in the spatial domain ［J］. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2009, 18(10): 2364-2369.

［5］WEI H L, BILLINGS S A, ZHAO Y F, et al. An adaptive wavelet neural network for spatio- temporal system identification ［J］. Neural Networks, 2010, 23(10): 1286-1299.

［6］LAZZARO D, MONTEFUSCO L B. Edge-preserving wavelet thresholding for image denoising ［J］. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 2007, 210(1/2): 222-231.

［7］JUSTEN L, RAMLAU R. A general framework for soft-shrinkage with applications to blind deconvolution and wavelet denoising［J］. Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis, 2009, 26(1): 43-63.

［8］VO A P N, ORAINTARA S. A study of relative phase in complex wavelet domain: Property statistics and applications in texture image retrieval and segmentation ［J］. Signal Processing: Image Communication, 2010, 25(1): 28-46.

［9］BHUTADA G G, ANAND R S, SAXENA S C. Edge preserves image enhancement using adaptive fusion of images denoised by wavelet and curvelet transform［J］. Digital Signal Processing, 2011, 21(1): 118-130.

［10］RUDIN L I, OSHER S, FATEMI E. Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms［J］. Physica D:Nonlinear Phenomena, 1992, 60(1/2/3/4): 259-268.

［11］CHEN Q, MONTESIOS P, SUN Q S, et al. Adaptive total variation denoising based on difference curvature ［J］. Image and Vision Computing, 2010, 28(3): 298-306.

［12］BIRKHOLZ H. A unifying approach to isotropic and anisotropic total variation denoising models［J］. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 2011, 235(8):2502-2514.

［13］SHI Y Y, XIAOZHONG YANG X Z. New total variation regularized L1 model for image restoration ［J］. Digital Signal Processing, 2010, 20(6): 1656-1676.

［14］NASRI M, NEZAMABADI-POUR H. Image denoising in the wavelet domain using a new adaptive thresholding function［J］. Neurocomputing, 2009, 72(4/5/6): 1012-1025.

[1]	陈利霞, 班颖, 王学文. 基于张量核范数与3D全变分的背景减除[J]. 计算机应用, 2020, 40(9): 2737-2742.
[2]	王睿, 黄微, 胡南强. 基于全变分模型的多时相遥感影像厚云去除算法[J]. 计算机应用, 2020, 40(7): 2126-2130.
[3]	耿源谦, 吴传生, 刘文. 混合非凸非光滑正则化约束的模糊图像盲复原[J]. 计算机应用, 2020, 40(4): 1171-1176.
[4]	王文杰, 乔志伟, 牛蕾, 席雅睿. 自适应步长非局部全变分约束迭代图像重建算法[J]. 计算机应用, 2020, 40(1): 245-251.
[5]	李南云, 王旭光, 吴华强, 何青林. 基于灰度塔评分的匹配模型构建在无人机网络视频拼接中的应用[J]. 计算机应用, 2019, 39(5): 1480-1484.
[6]	陈利霞, 刘俊丽, 王学文. 结合加权Schatten-p范数与3D全变分的前景检测[J]. 计算机应用, 2019, 39(4): 1170-1175.
[7]	娄梦莹, 袁丽莎, 刘娅琴, 万雪梅, 杨丰. 基于自适应融合的手掌静脉增强方法[J]. 计算机应用, 2019, 39(4): 1176-1182.
[8]	汪汉新, 洪思琴. 基于环分块的能耗均衡分簇路由算法[J]. 计算机应用, 2019, 39(1): 251-255.
[9]	郭庆荣, 贾振红, 杨杰, Nikola KASABOV. 基于非下采样Shearlet变换与模糊对比度的合成孔径雷达图像增强[J]. 计算机应用, 2018, 38(9): 2701-2705.
[10]	熊兴隆, 杨立香, 马愈昭, 庄子波. 基于模糊C均值的低空风切变预警算法[J]. 计算机应用, 2018, 38(3): 655-660.
[11]	王青松, 葛慧. Winnowing指纹串匹配的重复数据删除算法[J]. 计算机应用, 2018, 38(3): 677-681.
[12]	杜秀丽, 张薇, 陈波. 基于波浪式矩阵置换的稀疏度均衡分块压缩感知算法[J]. 计算机应用, 2018, 38(12): 3541-3546.
[13]	张江鑫, 周佳波, 孟利民. 改进的暗通道先验快速图像去雾算法[J]. 计算机应用, 2017, 37(8): 2324-2328.
[14]	韩李涛, 刘海龙, 孔巧丽, 阳凡林. 基于多核计算环境的地貌晕渲并行算法[J]. 计算机应用, 2017, 37(7): 1911-1915.
[15]	鲍振华, 康宝生, 张雷, 张婧. 基于草图局部几何不变矩的图像检索方法[J]. 计算机应用, 2017, 37(6): 1753-1758.