Journals
  Publication Years
  Keywords
Search within results Open Search
Please wait a minute...
For Selected: Toggle Thumbnails
Multistage coupled decision-making framework for researcher redeployment after discipline revocation
Fei GAO, Dong CHEN, Dixing BIAN, Wenqiang FAN, Qidong LIU, Pei LYU, Chaoyang ZHANG, Mingliang XU
Journal of Computer Applications    2026, 46 (2): 416-426.   DOI: 10.11772/j.issn.1001-9081.2025030271
Abstract51)   HTML1)    PDF (1931KB)(6)       Save

The existing researcher redeployment after discipline revocation relies on manual decision-making, which makes it difficult to coordinate discipline associations effectively. In this context, Large Language Model (LLM) with strong knowledge analysis capabilities provides new ideas for discipline optimization based on researcher redeployment after discipline revocation. However, on university research data represented by scientific research information, they face challenges such as difficulty in understanding professional terms and obvious long-tail distribution. Therefore, a multistage coupled decision-making framework for the redeployment of researchers after discipline revocation, namely MCRF (Multistage Coupled Redeployment Framework), was proposed. MCRF was composed of four stages: recall, semantic enhancement, pairing, and reordering, and was able to decompose difficult problems into multiple relatively simple sub-problems effectively. Firstly, a discipline research word cloud association dataset was constructed to alleviate the problem of general models’ difficulty in understanding specialized academic terms. Secondly, an association recall algorithm was designed to recall Top-K related disciplines of scientific research information quickly, thereby reducing the overall decision-making time overhead. Finally, an implicit optimization module was introduced to generate diverse representations of scientific research information, thereby ensuring that tail discipline research information was able to be fully associated with researchers’ research directions, and accurate semantic matching was achieved through a fine-grained scientific research project ordering model. Experimental results show that on multiple datasets, the recall of the proposed framework reaches 92% in the recall stage, and the accuracy of the proposed framework is 96% in the reordering stage, verifying the effectiveness of MCRF in the task of discipline structure optimization effectively.

Table and Figures | Reference | Related Articles | Metrics