Airport capacity analysis for typical parallel runways based on simulation method

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1087.2012.02648

Journal of Computer Applications ›› 2012, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (09): 2648-2651.DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1087.2012.02648

• Typical applications • Previous Articles Next Articles

Airport capacity analysis for typical parallel runways based on simulation method

LI Xiong^1*,LI Dong-bin²,WEI Dong-xuan³

1.Planning and Design Institute,China Airport Construction Group Corporation of CAAC,Beijing 100101,China;
2.Department of Air Traffic Management,Civil Aviation of Management Institute of China,Beijing 100102,China;
3.Highway School,Chang'an University,Xi'an Shaanxi 710064,China

Received:2012-03-14 Revised:2012-04-28 Online:2012-09-01 Published:2012-09-01
Contact: Xiong LI

机场典型平行跑道容量仿真分析

李雄^1*,李冬宾²,卫东选³

1.中国民航机场建设集团公司规划设计总院,北京 100101;
2.中国民航管理干部学院空中交通安全管理系,北京 100102;
3.长安大学公路学院,西安 710064

通讯作者: 李雄
作者简介:李雄(1980-),男,天津人,工程师,博士,主要研究方向:机场仿真、空域和机场规划; 李冬宾(1977-),女,河北辛集人,讲师,博士,主要研究方向:飞行间隔; 卫东选(1980-),男,山西稷山人,讲师,博士,主要研究方向:交通运输系统。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(60972006)

Abstract

Abstract: The parallel runway system is the most popular configuration in airport multi-runway construction. Four types of representative parallel runways (space between 400m, 760m, 920m and 1525m) and corresponding operation modes were simulated by using Simmod. The Ultimate Capacity (UC) and Factual Operation Capacity (FOC) of parallel runways were analyzed taking consideration of runway crossing and non-runway crossing. The simulation result shows that in instrument flight rule, the FOC of widely spaced parallel runways was about 74 sorties per hour, the FOC of medially spaced parallel runways was about 65 sorties per hour, and that of closely spaced parallel runways was only more than 40 sorties per hour. In condition of non-runway crossing, the capacity of parallel runway system would be increased by 13%.

Key words: air traffic management, capacity evaluation, parallel runway, simulation, Simmod

摘要： 平行跑道系统是当前机场建设所采用的最主要的多跑道构型方式。应用Simmod仿真软件对平行跑道间距为400m、760m、920m和1525m 4种典型构型及相应的常用跑道运行模式进行了仿真研究。同时,考虑了跑道穿越和绕滑两种情况,分别对跑道极限容量和实际运行容量进行了分析。仿真结果表明:在仪表飞行规则下,远距平行跑道实际运行容量最高,约为74架次/小时,中距平行跑道实际运行容量约为65架次/小时,近距平行跑道实际运行容量约为40余架次/小时。在设置绕滑或无跑道穿越情况下,平行跑道系统容量可提升约13%。

关键词: 空中交通管理, 容量评估, 平行跑道, 仿真, Simmod

CLC Number:

TP391.9
V355

LI Xiong LI Dong-bin WEI Dong-xuan. Airport capacity analysis for typical parallel runways based on simulation method[J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2012, 32(09): 2648-2651.

李雄李冬宾卫东选. 机场典型平行跑道容量仿真分析[J]. 计算机应用, 2012, 32(09): 2648-2651.

References

[1]GILBO E P.Airport capacity:representation,estimation,optimization [J].IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology,1993,1(3):144-154.
[2]胡明华,刘松,苏兰根.基于统计分析的单跑道容量估计模型研究[J].数据采集与处理,2000,15(1):74-77.
[3]NEUFVILLE R D,ODONI A R.Airport systems planning,designs,and management[M].New York:McGraw-Hill,2002.
[4]余江,蒲云.跑道容量的概率模型及容量曲线[J].交通运输工程学报,2002,2(4):99-102.
[5]陈勇,曹义华,周勇.北京首都国际机场容量评估研究[J].飞行力学,2005,23(4):86-89.
[6]郭海琦,朱金福.近距平行跑道容量及延误水平计算模型[J].交通运输工程学报,2008,8(4):68-72.
[7]陈欣.机场空侧容量评估与优化方法研究[D].南京:南京航空航天大学,2007.
[8]WANG CHAO,ZHANG XINYUE,XU XIAOHAO.Simulation study on airfield system capacity analysis using SIMMOD[C]// 2008 International Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Design.Piscataway,NJ:IEEE Press,2008:87-90.
[9]GAO WEI,JIANG SIYUAN.Simulation study on closely spaced parallel runway analysis using SIMMOD plus[C]// Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Intelligent Computation Technology and Automation.Piscataway,NJ:IEEE Press,2010:344-347.
[10]高伟,黄朝伟.重庆机场终端区容量评估的仿真研究[J].中国民航大学学报,2010,28(5):1-4.
[11]鱼海洋,胡华清,姚津津.机场航空容量评估的计算机仿真方法[J].空中交通管理,2009(2):21-25.
[12]HUANG A S,SCHLEICHER D,HUNTER G.Future flight demand generation tool[C]// Proceedings of AIAA the 4th Aviation Technology,Integration and Operations (ATIO) Forum.Chicago:AIAA,2004:6400.
[13]李凯.近距平行进近研究[D].南京:南京航空航天大学,2005.
[14]顾正兵.虹桥机场近距平行跑道仪表运行方式研究[J].中国民航大学学报,2010,28(5):21-24.
[15]李浩瀚.飞行区容量研究综述[J].中国科技信息,2009(3):36-39.

Airport capacity analysis for typical parallel runways based on simulation method

机场典型平行跑道容量仿真分析

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

[1]	LI Jin, WANG Feng, YANG Shenyu. Freight routing optimization model and algorithm of battery-swapping electric vehicle [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2021, 41(6): 1792-1798.
[2]	LI Yan, CHEN Qiaoping. Internet rumor propagation model considering non-supportive comments [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2021, 41(4): 1128-1135.
[3]	WANG Jiangkun, HE Kunjin, CAO Hongfei, WANG Jinqiang, ZHANG Yan. Interactive water flow heating simulation based on smoothed particle hydrodynamics method [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2020, 40(5): 1409-1414.
[4]	ZHANG Yizhuo, GE Sen, WANG Liangjun, XIE Jiang, CAO Jie, ZHANG Wu. Parallel computing of bifurcation stenosis flows of carotid artery based on lattice Boltzmann method and large eddy simulation model [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2020, 40(2): 404-409.
[5]	LI Tian, ZHANG Shumei, ZHAO Junli. Design and implementation of intelligent flow field pathfinding algorithm for real-time strategy game [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2020, 40(2): 602-607.
[6]	SUN Tianqi, HU Jianpeng, HUANG Juan, FAN Ying. Bandwidth resource prediction and management of Web applications hosted on cloud [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2020, 40(1): 181-187.
[7]	HUANG Dongjin, DUAN Siwen, LEI Xue, LIANG Jingkun. Group formation control method based on Voronoi diagram [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2019, 39(6): 1799-1803.
[8]	ZHANG Cheng, CHEN Fulong, LIU Chao, QI Xuemei. XML-based component modeling and stimulation of cyber physical system [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2019, 39(6): 1842-1848.
[9]	ZHAO Shicao, XIAO Yonghao, DUAN Bowen, LI Yufeng. HSWAP: numerical simulation workflow management platform suitable for high performance computing environment [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2019, 39(6): 1569-1576.
[10]	LI Jing, LIU Dongshi. Reliability evaluation model for cloud storage systems with proactive fault tolerance [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2018, 38(9): 2631-2636.
[11]	ZHENG Yaoyu, FANG Yangwang, WEI Xianzhi, CHEN Shaohua, GAO Xiang, WANG Hongke, PENG Weishi. Evaluation method for simulation credibility based on cloud model [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2018, 38(6): 1535-1541.
[12]	WANG Jian, WANG Zhihong, ZHANG Lejun. Dynamic model of public opinion and simulation analysis of complex network evolution [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2018, 38(4): 1201-1206.
[13]	WU Wenyan, JIANG Xin, WANG Xiaofeng, LIU Yuan. Multi-scale network replication technology for fusion of virtualization and digital simulation [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2018, 38(3): 746-752.
[14]	WANG Chao, ZHU Ming, WANG Min. Evaluation of sector dynamic traffic capacity based on controller's cognitive load and improved ant colony algorithm [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2018, 38(1): 277-283.
[15]	ZHANG Rui, XIAO Ruliang, NI Youcong, DU Xin. Not-temporal attribute correlation model to generate table data realistically [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2017, 37(9): 2684-2688.