Journal of Computer Applications ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (10): 3260-3271.DOI: 10.11772/j.issn.1001-9081.2025081050
• Advanced computing • Previous Articles
Miaomiao LIU1,2, Jiahao XI1(
), Qiang ZHANG1, Jingfeng GUO3, Wenxiang SHI1
Received:2025-09-11
Revised:2025-11-10
Accepted:2025-11-17
Online:2025-11-27
Published:2026-10-10
Contact:
Jiahao XI
About author:LIU Miaomiao, born in 1982, Ph. D., professor. Her research interests include data mining, oil and gas big data analysis, swarm intelligence algorithms.Supported by:
刘苗苗1,2, 席佳豪1(
), 张强1, 郭景峰3, 史文祥1
通讯作者:
席佳豪
作者简介:刘苗苗(1982—),女,河南洛阳人,教授,博士,CCF会员,主要研究方向:数据挖掘、油气大数据分析、群体智能算法基金资助:CLC Number:
Miaomiao LIU, Jiahao XI, Qiang ZHANG, Jingfeng GUO, Wenxiang SHI. Improved hippopotamus optimization algorithm based on coupling interference and covariance evolution[J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2026, 46(10): 3260-3271.
刘苗苗, 席佳豪, 张强, 郭景峰, 史文祥. 基于耦合干扰与协方差进化改进的河马优化算法[J]. 《计算机应用》唯一官方网站, 2026, 46(10): 3260-3271.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.joca.cn/EN/10.11772/j.issn.1001-9081.2025081050
| 参数 | sumsq | df | F | PR(>F) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C(SearchAgents) | 1.08E+12 | 3 | 20.41 | 1.39×10-12 |
| C(CMA_Update_Interval) | 4.01E+12 | 3 | 75.72 | 2.66×10-41 |
| C(D_Value) | 4.35E+10 | 3 | 0.82 | 0.48 |
| C(SearchAgents):C(CMA_Update_Interval) | 9.61E+11 | 9 | 6.05 | 3.89 |
| C(SearchAgents):C(D_Value) | 2.16E+11 | 9 | 1.36 | 0.20 |
| C(CMA_Update_Interval):C(D_Value) | 7.57E+10 | 9 | 0.48 | 0.89 |
| C(SearchAgents):C(CMA_Update_Interval):C(D_Value) | 7.79E+11 | 27 | 1.63 | 0.02 |
| 残差项(Residual) | 1.02E+13 | 576 |
Tab. 1 Variance analysis results of LNC_HO under different parameter combinations (50 dimension)
| 参数 | sumsq | df | F | PR(>F) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C(SearchAgents) | 1.08E+12 | 3 | 20.41 | 1.39×10-12 |
| C(CMA_Update_Interval) | 4.01E+12 | 3 | 75.72 | 2.66×10-41 |
| C(D_Value) | 4.35E+10 | 3 | 0.82 | 0.48 |
| C(SearchAgents):C(CMA_Update_Interval) | 9.61E+11 | 9 | 6.05 | 3.89 |
| C(SearchAgents):C(D_Value) | 2.16E+11 | 9 | 1.36 | 0.20 |
| C(CMA_Update_Interval):C(D_Value) | 7.57E+10 | 9 | 0.48 | 0.89 |
| C(SearchAgents):C(CMA_Update_Interval):C(D_Value) | 7.79E+11 | 27 | 1.63 | 0.02 |
| 残差项(Residual) | 1.02E+13 | 576 |
| 算法 | 参数 | 含义 | 取值 |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMA-ES | 个体学习因子 | 1.0 | |
| WOA | 社会学习因子 | 1.0 | |
| HHO | 初始步长系数 | 0.3 | |
| COA | 选择父代数量 | 50.0 | |
| HO | 位置更新选择概率 | 0.5 | |
| IHO1 | 能量平衡控制参数 | 2.0 | |
| IHO2 | 探索权重系数 | 0.3 |
Tab. 2 Parameter settings of comparative algorithms
| 算法 | 参数 | 含义 | 取值 |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMA-ES | 个体学习因子 | 1.0 | |
| WOA | 社会学习因子 | 1.0 | |
| HHO | 初始步长系数 | 0.3 | |
| COA | 选择父代数量 | 50.0 | |
| HO | 位置更新选择概率 | 0.5 | |
| IHO1 | 能量平衡控制参数 | 2.0 | |
| IHO2 | 探索权重系数 | 0.3 |
| 函数 | CMA-ES | WOA | HHO | COA | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best Rank | STD | MEAN | Best Rank | STD | MEAN | Best Rank | STD | MEAN | Best Rank | STD | MEAN | |
| f1 | 6 | 1.59E+11 | 4.89E+11 | 4 | 2.79E+09 | 6.69E+09 | 8 | 9.33E+10 | 7.24E+11 | 7 | 3.09E+10 | 4.13E+11 |
| f3 | 4 | 5.16E+04 | 1.82E+05 | 5 | 3.06E+04 | 1.38E+05 | 8 | 2.74E+04 | 2.28E+05 | 7 | 1.30E+04 | 1.61E+05 |
| f4 | 6 | 5.55E+03 | 6.28E+03 | 4 | 1.56E+02 | 5.76E+02 | 8 | 3.09E+03 | 1.57E+04 | 7 | 1.00E+03 | 9.21E+03 |
| f8 | 7 | 5.18E+01 | 5.11E+02 | 5 | 4.82E+01 | 4.24E+02 | 8 | 4.49E+01 | 6.40E+02 | 6 | 4.63E+01 | 4.79E+02 |
| f9 | 5 | 6.45E+03 | 2.12E+04 | 7 | 4.52E+03 | 2.05E+04 | 8 | 9.49E+03 | 3.50E+04 | 6 | 1.83E+03 | 1.41E+04 |
| f10 | 5 | 5.51E+02 | 9.26E+03 | 6 | 1.05E+03 | 9.45E+03 | 8 | 6.73E+02 | 1.31E+04 | 7 | 1.60E+03 | 1.18E+04 |
| f14 | 2 | 6.91E+05 | 1.08E+06 | 5 | 6.57E+05 | 1.09E+06 | 8 | 8.39E+06 | 9.57E+06 | 4 | 9.73E+05 | 1.10E+06 |
| f16 | 5 | 3.82E+02 | 3.21E+03 | 6 | 6.24E+02 | 3.68E+03 | 8 | 6.23E+02 | 4.84E+03 | 7 | 6.08E+02 | 3.75E+03 |
| f17 | 6 | 1.83E+03 | 3.41E+03 | 7 | 4.62E+02 | 2.36E+03 | 8 | 2.21E+03 | 4.68E+03 | 5 | 2.64E+02 | 2.00E+03 |
| f25 | 6 | 1.04E+03 | 4.08E+03 | 4 | 6.66E+01 | 8.63E+02 | 8 | 1.03E+03 | 8.00E+03 | 7 | 7.11E+02 | 5.36E+03 |
| f28 | 5 | 1.33E+03 | 3.71E+03 | 4 | 2.44E+02 | 1.40E+03 | 8 | 9.12E+02 | 6.17E+03 | 6 | 9.06E+02 | 3.30E+03 |
| f29 | 2 | 2.97E+02 | 2.52E+03 | 7 | 8.96E+02 | 5.31E+03 | 8 | 4.05E+03 | 1.24E+04 | 5 | 1.36E+03 | 5.24E+03 |
| 函数 | HO | IHO1 | IHO2 | LNC_HO | ||||||||
| Best Rank | STD | MEAN | Best Rank | STD | MEAN | Best Rank | STD | MEAN | Best Rank | STD | MEAN | |
| f1 | 2 | 4.98E+05 | 1.25E+06 | 5 | 1.61E+10 | 8.30E+10 | 3 | 8.29E+05 | 1.89E+06 | 1 | 1.73E+03 | 4.42E+03 |
| f3 | 3 | 9.80E+03 | 6.65E+04 | 6 | 1.08E+04 | 1.44E+05 | 2 | 7.35E+03 | 6.02E+04 | 1 | 1.89E+03 | 2.29E+04 |
| f4 | 3 | 4.29E+01 | 2.74E+02 | 5 | 3.17E+02 | 1.44E+03 | 2 | 8.32E+01 | 3.22E+02 | 1 | 4.43E+01 | 2.01E+02 |
| f8 | 2 | 3.87E+01 | 2.94E+02 | 3 | 2.59E+01 | 3.23E+02 | 4 | 2.58E+01 | 3.32E+02 | 1 | 2.90E+01 | 2.12E+02 |
| f9 | 2 | 1.21E+03 | 1.14E+04 | 4 | 2.30E+03 | 1.47E+04 | 3 | 9.64E+02 | 1.22E+04 | 1 | 1.61E+03 | 7.11E+03 |
| f10 | 3 | 6.65E+02 | 7.28E+03 | 4 | 4.45E+02 | 7.23E+03 | 2 | 7.40E+02 | 6.97E+03 | 1 | 9.81E+02 | 6.16E+03 |
| f14 | 3 | 3.62E+05 | 7.16E+05 | 6 | 9.86E+05 | 1.05E+06 | 7 | 3.17E+05 | 6.45E+05 | 1 | 2.77E+04 | 5.17E+04 |
| f16 | 2 | 5.84E+02 | 2.26E+03 | 3 | 4.27E+02 | 2.19E+03 | 4 | 3.50E+02 | 2.37E+03 | 1 | 5.04E+02 | 2.01E+03 |
| f17 | 3 | 2.18E+02 | 1.68E+03 | 4 | 1.52E+02 | 1.67E+03 | 2 | 3.54E+02 | 1.64E+03 | 1 | 3.26E+02 | 1.33E+03 |
| f25 | 3 | 5.05E+01 | 7.27E+02 | 5 | 9.04E+01 | 1.25E+03 | 2 | 6.64E+01 | 7.06E+02 | 1 | 2.29E+01 | 5.45E+02 |
| f28 | 3 | 1.89E+02 | 9.92E+02 | 7 | 1.07E+02 | 2.24E+03 | 2 | 1.50E+02 | 8.25E+02 | 1 | 5.05E+01 | 5.86E+02 |
| f29 | 6 | 4.95E+02 | 4.09E+03 | 3 | 2.17E+02 | 3.24E+03 | 4 | 3.05E+02 | 3.86E+03 | 1 | 3.53E+02 | 2.32E+03 |
Tab. 3 Performance comparison of different algorithms on four types of CEC2017 benchmark functions (50 dimension)
| 函数 | CMA-ES | WOA | HHO | COA | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best Rank | STD | MEAN | Best Rank | STD | MEAN | Best Rank | STD | MEAN | Best Rank | STD | MEAN | |
| f1 | 6 | 1.59E+11 | 4.89E+11 | 4 | 2.79E+09 | 6.69E+09 | 8 | 9.33E+10 | 7.24E+11 | 7 | 3.09E+10 | 4.13E+11 |
| f3 | 4 | 5.16E+04 | 1.82E+05 | 5 | 3.06E+04 | 1.38E+05 | 8 | 2.74E+04 | 2.28E+05 | 7 | 1.30E+04 | 1.61E+05 |
| f4 | 6 | 5.55E+03 | 6.28E+03 | 4 | 1.56E+02 | 5.76E+02 | 8 | 3.09E+03 | 1.57E+04 | 7 | 1.00E+03 | 9.21E+03 |
| f8 | 7 | 5.18E+01 | 5.11E+02 | 5 | 4.82E+01 | 4.24E+02 | 8 | 4.49E+01 | 6.40E+02 | 6 | 4.63E+01 | 4.79E+02 |
| f9 | 5 | 6.45E+03 | 2.12E+04 | 7 | 4.52E+03 | 2.05E+04 | 8 | 9.49E+03 | 3.50E+04 | 6 | 1.83E+03 | 1.41E+04 |
| f10 | 5 | 5.51E+02 | 9.26E+03 | 6 | 1.05E+03 | 9.45E+03 | 8 | 6.73E+02 | 1.31E+04 | 7 | 1.60E+03 | 1.18E+04 |
| f14 | 2 | 6.91E+05 | 1.08E+06 | 5 | 6.57E+05 | 1.09E+06 | 8 | 8.39E+06 | 9.57E+06 | 4 | 9.73E+05 | 1.10E+06 |
| f16 | 5 | 3.82E+02 | 3.21E+03 | 6 | 6.24E+02 | 3.68E+03 | 8 | 6.23E+02 | 4.84E+03 | 7 | 6.08E+02 | 3.75E+03 |
| f17 | 6 | 1.83E+03 | 3.41E+03 | 7 | 4.62E+02 | 2.36E+03 | 8 | 2.21E+03 | 4.68E+03 | 5 | 2.64E+02 | 2.00E+03 |
| f25 | 6 | 1.04E+03 | 4.08E+03 | 4 | 6.66E+01 | 8.63E+02 | 8 | 1.03E+03 | 8.00E+03 | 7 | 7.11E+02 | 5.36E+03 |
| f28 | 5 | 1.33E+03 | 3.71E+03 | 4 | 2.44E+02 | 1.40E+03 | 8 | 9.12E+02 | 6.17E+03 | 6 | 9.06E+02 | 3.30E+03 |
| f29 | 2 | 2.97E+02 | 2.52E+03 | 7 | 8.96E+02 | 5.31E+03 | 8 | 4.05E+03 | 1.24E+04 | 5 | 1.36E+03 | 5.24E+03 |
| 函数 | HO | IHO1 | IHO2 | LNC_HO | ||||||||
| Best Rank | STD | MEAN | Best Rank | STD | MEAN | Best Rank | STD | MEAN | Best Rank | STD | MEAN | |
| f1 | 2 | 4.98E+05 | 1.25E+06 | 5 | 1.61E+10 | 8.30E+10 | 3 | 8.29E+05 | 1.89E+06 | 1 | 1.73E+03 | 4.42E+03 |
| f3 | 3 | 9.80E+03 | 6.65E+04 | 6 | 1.08E+04 | 1.44E+05 | 2 | 7.35E+03 | 6.02E+04 | 1 | 1.89E+03 | 2.29E+04 |
| f4 | 3 | 4.29E+01 | 2.74E+02 | 5 | 3.17E+02 | 1.44E+03 | 2 | 8.32E+01 | 3.22E+02 | 1 | 4.43E+01 | 2.01E+02 |
| f8 | 2 | 3.87E+01 | 2.94E+02 | 3 | 2.59E+01 | 3.23E+02 | 4 | 2.58E+01 | 3.32E+02 | 1 | 2.90E+01 | 2.12E+02 |
| f9 | 2 | 1.21E+03 | 1.14E+04 | 4 | 2.30E+03 | 1.47E+04 | 3 | 9.64E+02 | 1.22E+04 | 1 | 1.61E+03 | 7.11E+03 |
| f10 | 3 | 6.65E+02 | 7.28E+03 | 4 | 4.45E+02 | 7.23E+03 | 2 | 7.40E+02 | 6.97E+03 | 1 | 9.81E+02 | 6.16E+03 |
| f14 | 3 | 3.62E+05 | 7.16E+05 | 6 | 9.86E+05 | 1.05E+06 | 7 | 3.17E+05 | 6.45E+05 | 1 | 2.77E+04 | 5.17E+04 |
| f16 | 2 | 5.84E+02 | 2.26E+03 | 3 | 4.27E+02 | 2.19E+03 | 4 | 3.50E+02 | 2.37E+03 | 1 | 5.04E+02 | 2.01E+03 |
| f17 | 3 | 2.18E+02 | 1.68E+03 | 4 | 1.52E+02 | 1.67E+03 | 2 | 3.54E+02 | 1.64E+03 | 1 | 3.26E+02 | 1.33E+03 |
| f25 | 3 | 5.05E+01 | 7.27E+02 | 5 | 9.04E+01 | 1.25E+03 | 2 | 6.64E+01 | 7.06E+02 | 1 | 2.29E+01 | 5.45E+02 |
| f28 | 3 | 1.89E+02 | 9.92E+02 | 7 | 1.07E+02 | 2.24E+03 | 2 | 1.50E+02 | 8.25E+02 | 1 | 5.05E+01 | 5.86E+02 |
| f29 | 6 | 4.95E+02 | 4.09E+03 | 3 | 2.17E+02 | 3.24E+03 | 4 | 3.05E+02 | 3.86E+03 | 1 | 3.53E+02 | 2.32E+03 |
| 算法 | Rank | Chi‑square | P值 |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMA-ES | 5.971 | 83.6 | 9.19×10-15 |
| WOA | 5.167 | ||
| HHO | 8.000 | ||
| COA | 6.167 | ||
| HO | 3.971 | ||
| IHO1 | 2.971 | ||
| IHO2 | 2.667 | ||
| LNC_HO | 1.250 |
Tab. 4 Friedman test results of algorithms on CEC2017 benchmark functions with M=12 (50 dimension)
| 算法 | Rank | Chi‑square | P值 |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMA-ES | 5.971 | 83.6 | 9.19×10-15 |
| WOA | 5.167 | ||
| HHO | 8.000 | ||
| COA | 6.167 | ||
| HO | 3.971 | ||
| IHO1 | 2.971 | ||
| IHO2 | 2.667 | ||
| LNC_HO | 1.250 |
| 算法 | 平均秩差 | 显著性(CD大于3.03) |
|---|---|---|
| CMA-ES | 4.667 | T |
| WOA | 3.917 | T |
| HHO | 6.750 | T |
| COA | 4.917 | T |
| HO | 3.667 | T |
| IHO1 | 2.667 | F |
| IHO2 | 2.417 | F |
Tab. 5 Nemenyi post-hoc test results between LNC_HO and comparative algorithms with M=12 (50 dimension)
| 算法 | 平均秩差 | 显著性(CD大于3.03) |
|---|---|---|
| CMA-ES | 4.667 | T |
| WOA | 3.917 | T |
| HHO | 6.750 | T |
| COA | 4.917 | T |
| HO | 3.667 | T |
| IHO1 | 2.667 | F |
| IHO2 | 2.417 | F |
| 算法 | + | - | ≈ | Z | P值 | γ=0.05 | γ=0.10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CMA-ES | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.88×10-4 | 显著 | 显著 |
| WOA | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.88×10-4 | 显著 | 显著 |
| HHO | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.88×10-4 | 显著 | 显著 |
| COA | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.88×10-4 | 显著 | 显著 |
| HO | 11 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 9.77×10-4 | 显著 | 显著 |
| IHO1 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2.44×10-3 | 显著 | 显著 |
| IHO2 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 4.88×10-3 | 显著 | 显著 |
Tab. 6 Performance evaluation using Wilcoxon signed-rank test between LNC_HO and comparative algorithms with M=12 (50 dimension)
| 算法 | + | - | ≈ | Z | P值 | γ=0.05 | γ=0.10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CMA-ES | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.88×10-4 | 显著 | 显著 |
| WOA | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.88×10-4 | 显著 | 显著 |
| HHO | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.88×10-4 | 显著 | 显著 |
| COA | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.88×10-4 | 显著 | 显著 |
| HO | 11 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 9.77×10-4 | 显著 | 显著 |
| IHO1 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2.44×10-3 | 显著 | 显著 |
| IHO2 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 4.88×10-3 | 显著 | 显著 |
| 序号 | 组件 | 单峰、多峰函数 | 混合函数 | 组合函数 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| f1 | f3 | f4 | f11 | f14 | f18 | f21 | f22 | f25 | ||
| V1 | 基础HO | 1.28E+06 | 4.34E+05 | 1.68E+03 | 5.03E+02 | 3.75E+05 | 6.55E+05 | 4.49E+03 | 8.97E+03 | 6.89E+02 |
| V2 | 移除拉丁超立方采样 | 6.70E+05 | 4.59E+04 | 2.05E+02 | 4.05E+02 | 1.95E+05 | 1.71E+05 | 3.77E+02 | 7.49E+03 | 5.87E+02 |
| V3 | 移除耦合干扰策略 | 1.26E+06 | 4.91E+04 | 1.81E+02 | 3.20E+02 | 2.60E+05 | 4.55E+05 | 4.85E+02 | 6.92E+03 | 5.73E+02 |
| V4 | 移除CMA-ES | 1.27E+06 | 4.60E+04 | 1.93E+02 | 4.12E+02 | 7.60E+04 | 1.50E+05 | 4.25E+02 | 7.03E+03 | 5.92E+02 |
| V5 | LNC_HO | 1.56E+03 | 2.34E+04 | 1.67E+02 | 2.18E+02 | 3.61E+03 | 1.06E+05 | 3.61E+02 | 6.04E+03 | 5.31E+02 |
Tab. 7 Results of LNC_HO components on the CEC2017 benchmark functions (50 dimension)
| 序号 | 组件 | 单峰、多峰函数 | 混合函数 | 组合函数 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| f1 | f3 | f4 | f11 | f14 | f18 | f21 | f22 | f25 | ||
| V1 | 基础HO | 1.28E+06 | 4.34E+05 | 1.68E+03 | 5.03E+02 | 3.75E+05 | 6.55E+05 | 4.49E+03 | 8.97E+03 | 6.89E+02 |
| V2 | 移除拉丁超立方采样 | 6.70E+05 | 4.59E+04 | 2.05E+02 | 4.05E+02 | 1.95E+05 | 1.71E+05 | 3.77E+02 | 7.49E+03 | 5.87E+02 |
| V3 | 移除耦合干扰策略 | 1.26E+06 | 4.91E+04 | 1.81E+02 | 3.20E+02 | 2.60E+05 | 4.55E+05 | 4.85E+02 | 6.92E+03 | 5.73E+02 |
| V4 | 移除CMA-ES | 1.27E+06 | 4.60E+04 | 1.93E+02 | 4.12E+02 | 7.60E+04 | 1.50E+05 | 4.25E+02 | 7.03E+03 | 5.92E+02 |
| V5 | LNC_HO | 1.56E+03 | 2.34E+04 | 1.67E+02 | 2.18E+02 | 3.61E+03 | 1.06E+05 | 3.61E+02 | 6.04E+03 | 5.31E+02 |
| 算法 | Ts | Th | R | L | Best | AVG | STD | 排名 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LNC_HO | 0.812 5 | 0.437 5 | 42.10 | 176.64 | 6.06E+03 | 6.09E+03 | 5.91E+01 | 1 |
| COA | 0.812 5 | 0.437 5 | 41.96 | 178.40 | 6.08E+03 | 6.18E+03 | 1.04E+02 | 2 |
| HO | 0.875 0 | 0.437 5 | 45.34 | 140.25 | 6.09E+03 | 6.64E+03 | 3.66E+02 | 3 |
| IHO2 | 0.875 0 | 0.437 5 | 45.34 | 140.25 | 6.09E+03 | 6.69E+03 | 2.68E+02 | 4 |
| WOA | 0.875 0 | 0.437 5 | 44.62 | 147.75 | 6.17E+03 | 7.09E+03 | 5.91E+02 | 5 |
| IHO1 | 0.812 5 | 0.437 5 | 41.09 | 189.54 | 6.19E+03 | 6.59E+03 | 2.08E+02 | 6 |
| HHO | 0.937 5 | 0.500 0 | 48.36 | 111.90 | 6.39E+03 | 9.32E+03 | 2.56E+03 | 7 |
| CMA-ES | 0.937 5 | 0.500 0 | 46.81 | 125.97 | 6.55E+03 | 7.79E+03 | 6.43E+03 | 8 |
Tab. 8 Optimal solutions and performance comparison in pressure vessel design problem
| 算法 | Ts | Th | R | L | Best | AVG | STD | 排名 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LNC_HO | 0.812 5 | 0.437 5 | 42.10 | 176.64 | 6.06E+03 | 6.09E+03 | 5.91E+01 | 1 |
| COA | 0.812 5 | 0.437 5 | 41.96 | 178.40 | 6.08E+03 | 6.18E+03 | 1.04E+02 | 2 |
| HO | 0.875 0 | 0.437 5 | 45.34 | 140.25 | 6.09E+03 | 6.64E+03 | 3.66E+02 | 3 |
| IHO2 | 0.875 0 | 0.437 5 | 45.34 | 140.25 | 6.09E+03 | 6.69E+03 | 2.68E+02 | 4 |
| WOA | 0.875 0 | 0.437 5 | 44.62 | 147.75 | 6.17E+03 | 7.09E+03 | 5.91E+02 | 5 |
| IHO1 | 0.812 5 | 0.437 5 | 41.09 | 189.54 | 6.19E+03 | 6.59E+03 | 2.08E+02 | 6 |
| HHO | 0.937 5 | 0.500 0 | 48.36 | 111.90 | 6.39E+03 | 9.32E+03 | 2.56E+03 | 7 |
| CMA-ES | 0.937 5 | 0.500 0 | 46.81 | 125.97 | 6.55E+03 | 7.79E+03 | 6.43E+03 | 8 |
| [1] | 刘苗苗,张玉莹,郭景峰,等. 融合多策略改进的自适应狮群优化算法[J]. 北京邮电大学学报, 2024, 47(1): 85-93. |
| Liu Miaomiao, Zhang Yuying, Guo Jingfeng, et al. Improved adaptive lion swarm optimization algorithm based on multi-strategy[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, 2024, 47(1): 85-93. | |
| [2] | Mirjalili S. Genetic algorithm[M]// Evolutionary algorithms and neural networks: theory and applications, SCI 780. Cham: Springer, 2019: 43-55. |
| [3] | Kennedy J, Eberhart R. Particle swarm optimization[C]// ICNN 1995 — Volume 4. Piscataway: IEEE, 1995: 1942-1948. |
| [4] | Abualigah L, Shehab M, Alshinwan M, et al. Ant lion optimizer: a comprehensive survey of its variants and applications[J]. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 2021, 28(3): 1397-1416. |
| [5] | Nadimi-Shahraki M H, Zamani H, Asghari Varzaneh Z, et al. A systematic review of the whale optimization algorithm: theoretical foundation, improvements, and hybridizations[J]. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 2023, 30(7): 4113-4159. |
| [6] | Shehab M, Mashal I, Momani Z, et al. Harris hawks optimization algorithm: variants and applications[J]. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 2022, 29(7): 5579-5603. |
| [7] | Dehghani M, Montazeri Z, Trojovská E, et al. Coati Optimization Algorithm: a new bio-inspired metaheuristic algorithm for solving optimization problems[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2023, 259: No.110011. |
| [8] | Ji J, Wu T, Yang C. Neural population dynamics optimization algorithm: a novel brain-inspired meta-heuristic method[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2024, 300: No.112194. |
| [9] | Amiri M H, Mehrabi Hashjin N, Montazeri M, et al. Hippopotamus optimization algorithm: a novel nature-inspired optimization algorithm[J]. Scientific Reports, 2024, 14: No.5032. |
| [10] | 袁磊. 融合多策略的改进河马优化算法及其应用[J]. 海南大学学报(自然科学版中英文), 2025, 43(3): 289-296. |
| Yuan Lei. Application of improved hippopotamus optimization algorithm integrating multi-strategy[J]. Natural Science of Hainan University, 2025, 43(3): 289-296. | |
| [11] | 杨驰泽,吴韡,王祥,等. 基于改进河马优化算法的含分布式电源配电网重构[J]. 电工电气, 2024(10): 1-7. |
| Yang Chize, Wu Wei, Wang Xiang, et al. The distribution network reconstruction with distribution generation based on improved hippo optimization algorithm[J]. Electrotechnics Electric, 2024(10): 1-7. | |
| [12] | Wang H, Binti Mansor N N, Mokhlis H B. Novel hybrid optimization technique for solar photovoltaic output prediction using improved hippopotamus algorithm[J]. Applied Sciences, 2024, 14(17): No.7803. |
| [13] | Wang W, Tian J. An improved hippopotamus optimization algorithm utilizing swarm-elite learning mechanism’s Levy flight and quadratic interpolation operators for optimal parameters extraction in photovoltaic models[C]// ICIC 2024, LNCS 14862. Singapore: Springer, 2024: 264-277. |
| [14] | Shields M D, Zhang J. The generalization of Latin hypercube sampling[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2016, 148: 96-108. |
| [15] | 杨紫晴,姚加林,伍国华,等. 集成协方差矩阵自适应进化策略与差分进化的优化算法[J]. 控制理论与应用, 2021, 38(10): 1493-1502. |
| Yang Ziqing, Yao Jialin, Wu Guohua, et al. Ensemble optimization algorithm from covariance matrix adaptive evolution strategy and differential evolution[J]. Control Theory and Applications, 2021, 38(10): 1493-1502. | |
| [16] | Thamilselvan S, Ahad N O R A. Comparison of post hoc test on non-communicable diseases data[J]. Quantum Journal of Engineering, Science and Technology, 2023, 4(3): 12-18. |
| [17] | Sheldon M R, Fillyaw M J, Thompson W D. The use and interpretation of the Friedman test in the analysis of ordinal-scale data in repeated measures designs[J]. Physiotherapy Research International, 1996, 1(4): 221-228. |
| [18] | Demšar J. Statistical comparisons of classifiers over multiple data sets[J]. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2006, 7: 1-30. |
| [19] | Tokusaka T, Masuyama N, Nojima Y. Constrained multi-modal multi-objective evolutionary algorithm with problem transformation into two-objective subproblems[C]// SCIS&ISIS 2024. Piscataway: IEEE, 2024: 1-6. |
| [20] | Zhao F, Jiang T, Xu T, et al. A co-evolutionary migrating birds optimization algorithm based on online learning policy gradient[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2023, 228: No.120261. |
| [1] | Xiaoxin DU, Wei ZHOU, Hao WANG, Tianru HAO, Zhenfei WANG, Mei JIN, Jianfei ZHANG. Survey of subgroup optimization strategies for intelligent algorithms [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2024, 44(3): 819-830. |
| [2] | Bo WANG, Hao WANG, Xiaoxin DU, Xiaodong ZHENG, Wei ZHOU. Hybrid dragonfly algorithm based on subpopulation and differential evolution [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2023, 43(9): 2868-2876. |
| [3] | LI Kewen, MA Xiangbo, HOU Wenyan. Enhanced fireworks algorithm with adaptive merging strategy and guidance operator [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2021, 41(1): 81-86. |
| [4] | YU Dekuang, YANG Yi, QIAN Jun. Dynamic random distribution particle swarm optimization strategy for cloud computing resources [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2018, 38(12): 3490-3495. |
| [5] | YU Changqing WANG zhurong. Producer pre-selection mechanism based on self-adaptive group search optimizer [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2013, 33(11): 3102-3106. |
| [6] | Ben-da ZHOU Hong-liang YAO Ming-hua ZHOU. Improved genetic algorithm based on Latin hypercube sampling and immune mechanism [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2011, 31(04): 1103-1106. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||