Journal of Computer Applications ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (9): 2920-2930.DOI: 10.11772/j.issn.1001-9081.2025080993
• Advanced computing • Previous Articles
Yuanxin LI1, Hecheng LI2(
), Xiaojing HAN1
Received:2025-09-02
Revised:2025-10-28
Accepted:2025-11-07
Online:2025-11-17
Published:2026-09-10
Contact:
Hecheng LI
About author:LI Yuanxin, born in 1998, M. S. candidate. Her research interests include intelligent optimization algorithm.Supported by:通讯作者:
李和成
作者简介:李源昕(1998—),女,贵州贵阳人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向:智能优化算法基金资助:CLC Number:
Yuanxin LI, Hecheng LI, Xiaojing HAN. Adaptive constrained multi-objective evolutionary algorithm guided by effective information[J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2026, 46(9): 2920-2930.
李源昕, 李和成, 韩晓婧. 有效信息引导的自适应约束多目标进化算法[J]. 《计算机应用》唯一官方网站, 2026, 46(9): 2920-2930.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.joca.cn/EN/10.11772/j.issn.1001-9081.2025080993
| 问题 | BiCo | C-TAEA | CCMO | NRC2 | c-DPEA | IM-C-MOEA/D | IACMEA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CF1 | 1.650 1E-2 (2.21E-3) - | 4.585 0E-2 (4.78E-3) - | 6.282 1E-3 (6.33E-4) - | 1.268 2E-2 (8.19E-4) - | 7.428 2E-3 (8.25E-4) - | 5.493 2E-2 (1.12E-2) - | 2.491 7E-3 (5.66E-4) |
| CF2 | 5.672 3E-2 (2.28E-2) - | 4.555 0E-2 (1.25E-2) - | 4.104 6E-2 (1.53E-2) - | 2.538 2E-2 (6.11E-3) - | 3.562 4E-2 (9.87E-3) - | 7.552 0E-2 (3.11E-2) - | 1.638 6E-2 (5.91E-3) |
| CF3 | 2.299 7E-1 (6.73E-2) = | 2.344 1E-1 (5.95E-2) - | 2.942 1E-1 (1.14E-1) - | 2.583 4E-1 (8.53E-2) - | 2.555 5E-1 (8.19E-2) - | 3.614 7E-1 (1.79E-1) - | 1.843 2E-1 (7.41E-2) |
| CF4 | 1.056 1E-1 (4.70E-2) = | 9.347 2E-2 (3.83E-2) = | 1.034 4E-1 (4.44E-2) = | 8.440 6E-2 (3.10E-2) = | 9.309 4E-2 (3.63E-2) = | 1.508 0E-1 (6.96E-2) - | 8.200 2E-2 (1.65E-2) |
| CF5 | 3.447 6E-1 (1.42E-1) = | 3.313 3E-1 (1.41E-1) = | 3.107 0E-1 (1.38E-1) = | 2.078 1E-1 (7.78E-2) + | 2.960 5E-1 (1.41E-1) = | 3.158 6E-1 (8.56E-2) - | 2.474 5E-1 (6.95E-2) |
| CF6 | 8.173 8E-2 (3.94E-2) - | 1.017 7E-1 (4.22E-2) - | 6.121 9E-2 (3.53E-2) - | 3.509 0E-2 (1.05E-2) - | 5.284 0E-2 (3.24E-2) - | 1.459 3E-1 (4.25E-2) - | 2.745 0E-2 (5.14E-3) |
| CF7 | 3.171 3E-1 (1.25E-1) - | 3.494 4E-1 (1.50E-1) - | 2.373 8E-1 (9.47E-2) - | 1.690 4E-1 (6.12E-2) = | 3.251 0E-1 (1.21E-1) - | 3.655 9E-1 (1.38E-1) - | 1.880 9E-1 (1.17E-1) |
| CF8 | 1.998 5E-1 (7.61E-2) - | 2.533 9E-1 (2.65E-2) - | 1.979 9E-1 (9.66E-2) - | 1.941 6E-1 (1.53E-2) - | 2.074 4E-1 (7.40E-2) - | 1.890 0E-1 (1.99E-2) - | 1.450 8E-1 (1.08E-2) |
| CF9 | 9.458 3E-2 (6.66E-3) - | 1.321 6E-1 (2.09E-2) - | 1.031 8E-1 (1.98E-2) - | 1.003 7E-1 (5.80E-3) - | 9.214 5E-2 (4.85E-3) - | 1.180 0E-1 (1.58E-2) - | 8.868 4E-2 (4.49E-3) |
| CF10 | 4.206 4E-1 (8.05E-2) = | 3.809 3E-1 (1.46E-1) - | 3.382 4E-1 (1.05E-1) - | 4.246 8E-1 (1.94E-1) - | 4.073 5E-1 (1.24E-1) - | 1.918 7E-1 (1.09E-1) + | 3.224 6E-1 (2.79E-1) |
Tab. 1 IGD values of seven algorithms on CF benchmark problems
| 问题 | BiCo | C-TAEA | CCMO | NRC2 | c-DPEA | IM-C-MOEA/D | IACMEA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CF1 | 1.650 1E-2 (2.21E-3) - | 4.585 0E-2 (4.78E-3) - | 6.282 1E-3 (6.33E-4) - | 1.268 2E-2 (8.19E-4) - | 7.428 2E-3 (8.25E-4) - | 5.493 2E-2 (1.12E-2) - | 2.491 7E-3 (5.66E-4) |
| CF2 | 5.672 3E-2 (2.28E-2) - | 4.555 0E-2 (1.25E-2) - | 4.104 6E-2 (1.53E-2) - | 2.538 2E-2 (6.11E-3) - | 3.562 4E-2 (9.87E-3) - | 7.552 0E-2 (3.11E-2) - | 1.638 6E-2 (5.91E-3) |
| CF3 | 2.299 7E-1 (6.73E-2) = | 2.344 1E-1 (5.95E-2) - | 2.942 1E-1 (1.14E-1) - | 2.583 4E-1 (8.53E-2) - | 2.555 5E-1 (8.19E-2) - | 3.614 7E-1 (1.79E-1) - | 1.843 2E-1 (7.41E-2) |
| CF4 | 1.056 1E-1 (4.70E-2) = | 9.347 2E-2 (3.83E-2) = | 1.034 4E-1 (4.44E-2) = | 8.440 6E-2 (3.10E-2) = | 9.309 4E-2 (3.63E-2) = | 1.508 0E-1 (6.96E-2) - | 8.200 2E-2 (1.65E-2) |
| CF5 | 3.447 6E-1 (1.42E-1) = | 3.313 3E-1 (1.41E-1) = | 3.107 0E-1 (1.38E-1) = | 2.078 1E-1 (7.78E-2) + | 2.960 5E-1 (1.41E-1) = | 3.158 6E-1 (8.56E-2) - | 2.474 5E-1 (6.95E-2) |
| CF6 | 8.173 8E-2 (3.94E-2) - | 1.017 7E-1 (4.22E-2) - | 6.121 9E-2 (3.53E-2) - | 3.509 0E-2 (1.05E-2) - | 5.284 0E-2 (3.24E-2) - | 1.459 3E-1 (4.25E-2) - | 2.745 0E-2 (5.14E-3) |
| CF7 | 3.171 3E-1 (1.25E-1) - | 3.494 4E-1 (1.50E-1) - | 2.373 8E-1 (9.47E-2) - | 1.690 4E-1 (6.12E-2) = | 3.251 0E-1 (1.21E-1) - | 3.655 9E-1 (1.38E-1) - | 1.880 9E-1 (1.17E-1) |
| CF8 | 1.998 5E-1 (7.61E-2) - | 2.533 9E-1 (2.65E-2) - | 1.979 9E-1 (9.66E-2) - | 1.941 6E-1 (1.53E-2) - | 2.074 4E-1 (7.40E-2) - | 1.890 0E-1 (1.99E-2) - | 1.450 8E-1 (1.08E-2) |
| CF9 | 9.458 3E-2 (6.66E-3) - | 1.321 6E-1 (2.09E-2) - | 1.031 8E-1 (1.98E-2) - | 1.003 7E-1 (5.80E-3) - | 9.214 5E-2 (4.85E-3) - | 1.180 0E-1 (1.58E-2) - | 8.868 4E-2 (4.49E-3) |
| CF10 | 4.206 4E-1 (8.05E-2) = | 3.809 3E-1 (1.46E-1) - | 3.382 4E-1 (1.05E-1) - | 4.246 8E-1 (1.94E-1) - | 4.073 5E-1 (1.24E-1) - | 1.918 7E-1 (1.09E-1) + | 3.224 6E-1 (2.79E-1) |
| 问题 | BiCo | C-TAEA | CCMO | NRC2 | c-DPEA | IM-C-MOEA/D | IACMEA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CF1 | 5.451 4E-1 (2.83E-3) - | 5.120 7E-1 (5.11E-3) - | 5.582 7E-1 (8.14E-4) - | 5.503 1E-1 (1.02E-3) - | 5.569 1E-1 (9.84E-4) - | 5.009 6E-1 (1.74E-2) - | 5.630 8E-1 (6.54E-4) |
| CF2 | 5.971 8E-1 (3.04E-2) - | 6.120 8E-1 (2.54E-2) - | 6.352 9E-1 (1.92E-2) - | 6.439 8E-1 (8.81E-3) - | 6.346 3E-1 (1.77E-2) - | 5.887 2E-1 (2.18E-2) - | 6.613 1E-1 (8.95E-3) |
| CF3 | 1.780 1E-1 (4.68E-2) = | 1.833 1E-1 (3.35E-2) = | 1.680 8E-1 (5.37E-2) - | 1.691 2E-1 (4.90E-2) - | 1.753 4E-1 (3.91E-2) = | 1.304 0E-1 (5.01E-2) - | 2.148 5E-1 (6.01E-2) |
| CF4 | 4.013 8E-1 (5.71E-2) = | 4.161 3E-1 (3.05E-2) = | 4.126 5E-1 (4.31E-2) = | 4.276 5E-1 (3.58E-2) = | 4.206 4E-1 (3.88E-2) = | 3.804 1E-1 (3.70E-2) - | 4.234 9E-1 (2.36E-2) |
| CF5 | 2.528 6E-1 (6.74E-2) = | 2.779 0E-1 (6.58E-2) + | 2.817 3E-1 (7.19E-2) + | 2.976 6E-1 (5.18E-2) + | 2.810 8E-1 (7.57E-2) + | 2.808 3E-1 (4.20E-2) + | 2.056 3E-1 (9.80E-2) |
| CF6 | 6.337 8E-1 (2.19E-2) - | 6.313 9E-1 (2.10E-2) - | 6.515 1E-1 (1.77E-2) - | 6.613 3E-1 (8.66E-3) - | 6.565 3E-1 (1.25E-2) - | 5.823 6E-1 (2.32E-2) - | 6.698 8E-1 (7.57E-3) |
| CF7 | 4.209 2E-1 (9.67E-2) = | 3.993 6E-1 (1.04E-1) = | 4.435 0E-1 (9.12E-2) = | 4.885 2E-1 (7.80E-2) = | 4.214 2E-1 (6.68E-2) = | 3.868 1E-1 (9.29E-2) - | 4.508 1E-1 (1.57E-1) |
| CF8 | 3.213 1E-1 (4.61E-2) - | 2.451 6E-1 (3.45E-2) - | 3.137 7E-1 (8.42E-2) - | 3.179 0E-1 (1.73E-2) - | 2.850 7E-1 (6.62E-2) - | 3.341 7E-1 (1.72E-2) - | 4.002 6E-1 (1.11E-2) |
| CF9 | 4.264 3E-1 (1.24E-2) - | 3.654 5E-1 (2.62E-2) - | 4.142 9E-1 (3.34E-2) - | 4.278 3E-1 (1.20E-2) - | 4.306 3E-1 (9.26E-3) - | 3.850 6E-1 (1.84E-2) - | 4.470 0E-1 (9.05E-3) |
| CF10 | 1.459 4E-1 (4.77E-2) = | 1.546 3E-1 (5.52E-2) - | 1.762 4E-1 (3.83E-2) - | 1.785 6E-1 (7.93E-2) - | 1.299 8E-1 (4.53E-2) - | 2.729 0E-1 (7.20E-2) = | 2.565 1E-1 (9.67E-2) |
Tab. 2 HV values of seven algorithms on CF benchmark problems
| 问题 | BiCo | C-TAEA | CCMO | NRC2 | c-DPEA | IM-C-MOEA/D | IACMEA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CF1 | 5.451 4E-1 (2.83E-3) - | 5.120 7E-1 (5.11E-3) - | 5.582 7E-1 (8.14E-4) - | 5.503 1E-1 (1.02E-3) - | 5.569 1E-1 (9.84E-4) - | 5.009 6E-1 (1.74E-2) - | 5.630 8E-1 (6.54E-4) |
| CF2 | 5.971 8E-1 (3.04E-2) - | 6.120 8E-1 (2.54E-2) - | 6.352 9E-1 (1.92E-2) - | 6.439 8E-1 (8.81E-3) - | 6.346 3E-1 (1.77E-2) - | 5.887 2E-1 (2.18E-2) - | 6.613 1E-1 (8.95E-3) |
| CF3 | 1.780 1E-1 (4.68E-2) = | 1.833 1E-1 (3.35E-2) = | 1.680 8E-1 (5.37E-2) - | 1.691 2E-1 (4.90E-2) - | 1.753 4E-1 (3.91E-2) = | 1.304 0E-1 (5.01E-2) - | 2.148 5E-1 (6.01E-2) |
| CF4 | 4.013 8E-1 (5.71E-2) = | 4.161 3E-1 (3.05E-2) = | 4.126 5E-1 (4.31E-2) = | 4.276 5E-1 (3.58E-2) = | 4.206 4E-1 (3.88E-2) = | 3.804 1E-1 (3.70E-2) - | 4.234 9E-1 (2.36E-2) |
| CF5 | 2.528 6E-1 (6.74E-2) = | 2.779 0E-1 (6.58E-2) + | 2.817 3E-1 (7.19E-2) + | 2.976 6E-1 (5.18E-2) + | 2.810 8E-1 (7.57E-2) + | 2.808 3E-1 (4.20E-2) + | 2.056 3E-1 (9.80E-2) |
| CF6 | 6.337 8E-1 (2.19E-2) - | 6.313 9E-1 (2.10E-2) - | 6.515 1E-1 (1.77E-2) - | 6.613 3E-1 (8.66E-3) - | 6.565 3E-1 (1.25E-2) - | 5.823 6E-1 (2.32E-2) - | 6.698 8E-1 (7.57E-3) |
| CF7 | 4.209 2E-1 (9.67E-2) = | 3.993 6E-1 (1.04E-1) = | 4.435 0E-1 (9.12E-2) = | 4.885 2E-1 (7.80E-2) = | 4.214 2E-1 (6.68E-2) = | 3.868 1E-1 (9.29E-2) - | 4.508 1E-1 (1.57E-1) |
| CF8 | 3.213 1E-1 (4.61E-2) - | 2.451 6E-1 (3.45E-2) - | 3.137 7E-1 (8.42E-2) - | 3.179 0E-1 (1.73E-2) - | 2.850 7E-1 (6.62E-2) - | 3.341 7E-1 (1.72E-2) - | 4.002 6E-1 (1.11E-2) |
| CF9 | 4.264 3E-1 (1.24E-2) - | 3.654 5E-1 (2.62E-2) - | 4.142 9E-1 (3.34E-2) - | 4.278 3E-1 (1.20E-2) - | 4.306 3E-1 (9.26E-3) - | 3.850 6E-1 (1.84E-2) - | 4.470 0E-1 (9.05E-3) |
| CF10 | 1.459 4E-1 (4.77E-2) = | 1.546 3E-1 (5.52E-2) - | 1.762 4E-1 (3.83E-2) - | 1.785 6E-1 (7.93E-2) - | 1.299 8E-1 (4.53E-2) - | 2.729 0E-1 (7.20E-2) = | 2.565 1E-1 (9.67E-2) |
| 问题 | BiCo | C-TAEA | CCMO | NRC2 | c-DPEA | IM-C-MOEA/D | IACMEA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIRCMOP1 | 2.181 4E-1 (2.34E-2) - | 3.058 2E-1 (8.49E-2) - | 2.663 9E-1 (6.74E-2) - | 1.465 9E-1 (1.90E-2) - | 1.413 7E-1 (3.31E-2) - | 3.356 0E-1 (2.40E-2) - | 6.853 3E-2 (3.48E-2) |
| LIRCMOP2 | 1.856 5E-1 (1.76E-2) - | 2.115 0E-1 (5.62E-2) - | 2.330 3E-1 (3.56E-2) - | 1.111 9E-1 (1.37E-2) - | 1.350 4E-1 (2.02E-2) - | 2.709 8E-1 (3.62E-2) - | 3.709 4E-2 (1.36E-2) |
| LIRCMOP3 | 2.292 4E-1 (3.42E-2) - | 3.729 0E-1 (1.04E-1) - | 2.837 5E-1 (5.83E-2) - | 1.335 4E-1 (3.34E-2) - | 1.587 7E-1 (3.93E-2) - | 3.360 3E-1 (1.84E-2) - | 4.010 1E-2 (1.75E-2) |
| LIRCMOP4 | 2.119 5E-1 (2.09E-2) - | 3.098 3E-1 (3.72E-2) - | 2.657 7E-1 (5.00E-2) - | 1.369 0E-1 (2.71E-2) - | 1.511 9E-1 (4.32E-2) - | 3.046 5E-1 (1.99E-2) - | 4.545 3E-2 (1.84E-2) |
| LIRCMOP5 | 1.222 6E+0 (4.58E-3) - | 1.094 3E+0 (3.36E-1) - | 2.745 9E-1 (6.70E-2) - | 1.213 9E+0 (1.03E-2) - | 3.092 7E-1 (7.30E-2) - | 1.470 6E+0 (5.37E-1) - | 5.756 2E-2 (1.06E-1) |
| LIRCMOP6 | 1.345 3E+0 (1.73E-4) - | 1.297 4E+0 (2.18E-1) - | 3.036 1E-1 (9.31E-2) - | 1.300 2E+0 (2.03E-1) - | 3.730 4E-1 (1.05E-1) - | 1.372 2E+0 (1.26E-2) - | 7.436 7E-3 (8.60E-4) |
| LIRCMOP7 | 4.438 7E-1 (6.35E-1) - | 1.973 4E-1 (1.51E-1) - | 1.186 7E-1 (2.90E-2) - | 2.419 0E-1 (3.66E-1) - | 1.228 0E-1 (3.14E-2) - | 1.647 2E+0 (3.57E-1) - | 1.861 7E-2 (1.49E-2) |
| LIRCMOP8 | 1.176 1E+0 (7.06E-1) - | 8.413 5E-1 (6.14E-1) - | 1.733 2E-1 (7.26E-2) - | 6.401 7E-1 (6.28E-1) - | 1.914 1E-1 (5.62E-2) - | 1.744 7E+0 (3.27E-2) - | 1.608 8E-2 (2.05E-2) |
| LIRCMOP9 | 9.721 4E-1 (1.07E-1) - | 5.477 3E-1 (9.26E-2) - | 5.265 4E-1 (1.31E-1) - | 4.551 6E-1 (9.20E-2) - | 4.208 2E-1 (1.23E-1) - | 8.579 5E-1 (1.06E-1) - | 1.610 6E-1 (1.14E-1) |
| LIRCMOP10 | 9.830 1E-1 (5.25E-2) - | 3.434 8E-1 (7.56E-2) - | 1.520 5E-1 (5.70E-2) - | 5.939 1E-1 (1.75E-1) - | 2.753 5E-1 (9.59E-2) - | 7.490 8E-1 (8.65E-2) - | 1.372 0E-2 (2.66E-3) |
| LIRCMOP11 | 7.873 9E-1 (1.67E-1) - | 2.151 0E-1 (5.11E-2) - | 6.175 9E-2 (3.27E-2) - | 5.375 5E-1 (1.64E-1) - | 9.746 8E-2 (4.01E-2) - | 7.234 3E-1 (1.80E-1) - | 6.558 5E-3 (8.67E-4) |
| LIRCMOP12 | 7.211 4E-1 (2.41E-1) - | 2.844 7E-1 (1.30E-1) - | 2.156 2E-1 (8.05E-2) - | 2.682 6E-1 (7.49E-2) - | 1.992 9E-1 (8.11E-2) - | 5.603 7E-1 (1.33E-1) - | 4.783 4E-2 (5.91E-2) |
| LIRCMOP13 | 1.319 1E+0 (1.93E-3) - | 1.083 3E-1 (1.66E-3) + | 9.357 5E-2 (1.37E-3) + | 1.316 3E+0 (1.75E-3) - | 9.316 2E-2 (1.01E-3) + | 1.349 1E+0 (8.04E-3) - | 1.295 8E-1 (1.77E-3) |
| LIRCMOP14 | 1.275 3E+0 (1.55E-3) - | 1.112 4E-1 (8.32E-4) - | 9.579 5E-2 (7.97E-4) + | 1.273 1E+0 (1.34E-3) - | 9.486 7E-2 (7.43E-4) + | 1.307 2E+0 (1.11E-2) - | 9.676 2E-2 (9.13E-4) |
Tab. 3 IGD values of seven algorithms on LIRCMOP benchmark problems
| 问题 | BiCo | C-TAEA | CCMO | NRC2 | c-DPEA | IM-C-MOEA/D | IACMEA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIRCMOP1 | 2.181 4E-1 (2.34E-2) - | 3.058 2E-1 (8.49E-2) - | 2.663 9E-1 (6.74E-2) - | 1.465 9E-1 (1.90E-2) - | 1.413 7E-1 (3.31E-2) - | 3.356 0E-1 (2.40E-2) - | 6.853 3E-2 (3.48E-2) |
| LIRCMOP2 | 1.856 5E-1 (1.76E-2) - | 2.115 0E-1 (5.62E-2) - | 2.330 3E-1 (3.56E-2) - | 1.111 9E-1 (1.37E-2) - | 1.350 4E-1 (2.02E-2) - | 2.709 8E-1 (3.62E-2) - | 3.709 4E-2 (1.36E-2) |
| LIRCMOP3 | 2.292 4E-1 (3.42E-2) - | 3.729 0E-1 (1.04E-1) - | 2.837 5E-1 (5.83E-2) - | 1.335 4E-1 (3.34E-2) - | 1.587 7E-1 (3.93E-2) - | 3.360 3E-1 (1.84E-2) - | 4.010 1E-2 (1.75E-2) |
| LIRCMOP4 | 2.119 5E-1 (2.09E-2) - | 3.098 3E-1 (3.72E-2) - | 2.657 7E-1 (5.00E-2) - | 1.369 0E-1 (2.71E-2) - | 1.511 9E-1 (4.32E-2) - | 3.046 5E-1 (1.99E-2) - | 4.545 3E-2 (1.84E-2) |
| LIRCMOP5 | 1.222 6E+0 (4.58E-3) - | 1.094 3E+0 (3.36E-1) - | 2.745 9E-1 (6.70E-2) - | 1.213 9E+0 (1.03E-2) - | 3.092 7E-1 (7.30E-2) - | 1.470 6E+0 (5.37E-1) - | 5.756 2E-2 (1.06E-1) |
| LIRCMOP6 | 1.345 3E+0 (1.73E-4) - | 1.297 4E+0 (2.18E-1) - | 3.036 1E-1 (9.31E-2) - | 1.300 2E+0 (2.03E-1) - | 3.730 4E-1 (1.05E-1) - | 1.372 2E+0 (1.26E-2) - | 7.436 7E-3 (8.60E-4) |
| LIRCMOP7 | 4.438 7E-1 (6.35E-1) - | 1.973 4E-1 (1.51E-1) - | 1.186 7E-1 (2.90E-2) - | 2.419 0E-1 (3.66E-1) - | 1.228 0E-1 (3.14E-2) - | 1.647 2E+0 (3.57E-1) - | 1.861 7E-2 (1.49E-2) |
| LIRCMOP8 | 1.176 1E+0 (7.06E-1) - | 8.413 5E-1 (6.14E-1) - | 1.733 2E-1 (7.26E-2) - | 6.401 7E-1 (6.28E-1) - | 1.914 1E-1 (5.62E-2) - | 1.744 7E+0 (3.27E-2) - | 1.608 8E-2 (2.05E-2) |
| LIRCMOP9 | 9.721 4E-1 (1.07E-1) - | 5.477 3E-1 (9.26E-2) - | 5.265 4E-1 (1.31E-1) - | 4.551 6E-1 (9.20E-2) - | 4.208 2E-1 (1.23E-1) - | 8.579 5E-1 (1.06E-1) - | 1.610 6E-1 (1.14E-1) |
| LIRCMOP10 | 9.830 1E-1 (5.25E-2) - | 3.434 8E-1 (7.56E-2) - | 1.520 5E-1 (5.70E-2) - | 5.939 1E-1 (1.75E-1) - | 2.753 5E-1 (9.59E-2) - | 7.490 8E-1 (8.65E-2) - | 1.372 0E-2 (2.66E-3) |
| LIRCMOP11 | 7.873 9E-1 (1.67E-1) - | 2.151 0E-1 (5.11E-2) - | 6.175 9E-2 (3.27E-2) - | 5.375 5E-1 (1.64E-1) - | 9.746 8E-2 (4.01E-2) - | 7.234 3E-1 (1.80E-1) - | 6.558 5E-3 (8.67E-4) |
| LIRCMOP12 | 7.211 4E-1 (2.41E-1) - | 2.844 7E-1 (1.30E-1) - | 2.156 2E-1 (8.05E-2) - | 2.682 6E-1 (7.49E-2) - | 1.992 9E-1 (8.11E-2) - | 5.603 7E-1 (1.33E-1) - | 4.783 4E-2 (5.91E-2) |
| LIRCMOP13 | 1.319 1E+0 (1.93E-3) - | 1.083 3E-1 (1.66E-3) + | 9.357 5E-2 (1.37E-3) + | 1.316 3E+0 (1.75E-3) - | 9.316 2E-2 (1.01E-3) + | 1.349 1E+0 (8.04E-3) - | 1.295 8E-1 (1.77E-3) |
| LIRCMOP14 | 1.275 3E+0 (1.55E-3) - | 1.112 4E-1 (8.32E-4) - | 9.579 5E-2 (7.97E-4) + | 1.273 1E+0 (1.34E-3) - | 9.486 7E-2 (7.43E-4) + | 1.307 2E+0 (1.11E-2) - | 9.676 2E-2 (9.13E-4) |
| 问题 | BiCo | C-TAEA | CCMO | NRC2 | c-DPEA | IM-C-MOEA/D | IACMEA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIRCMOP1 | 1.379 1E-1 (9.54E-3) - | 1.167 2E-1 (2.58E-2) - | 1.230 2E-1 (1.87E-2) - | 1.616 6E-1 (7.39E-3) - | 1.641 5E-1 (1.20E-2) - | 1.053 4E-1 (1.03E-2) - | 2.018 5E-1 (2.05E-2) |
| LIRCMOP2 | 2.595 8E-1 (1.12E-2) - | 2.570 4E-1 (3.47E-2) - | 2.388 7E-1 (1.67E-2) - | 2.952 7E-1 (9.04E-3) - | 2.890 0E-1 (1.27E-2) - | 2.249 2E-1 (2.33E-2) - | 3.421 7E-1 (6.82E-3) |
| LIRCMOP3 | 1.228 1E-1 (1.05E-2) - | 9.086 0E-2 (1.82E-2) - | 1.079 7E-1 (1.98E-2) - | 1.525 3E-1 (1.26E-2) - | 1.471 4E-1 (1.25E-2) - | 9.359 9E-2 (7.50E-3) - | 1.893 4E-1 (5.82E-3) |
| LIRCMOP4 | 2.214 5E-1 (9.79E-3) - | 1.841 4E-1 (1.62E-2) - | 2.059 5E-1 (2.19E-2) - | 2.552 0E-1 (1.43E-2) - | 2.528 5E-1 (1.89E-2) - | 1.879 4E-1 (1.19E-2) - | 2.962 5E-1 (7.23E-3) |
| LIRCMOP5 | 0.000 0E+0 (0.00E+0) - | 2.270 8E-2 (5.57E-2) - | 1.635 0E-1 (2.61E-2) - | 0.000 0E+0 (0.00E+0) - | 1.517 0E-1 (2.78E-2) - | 0.000 0E+0 (0.00E+0) - | 2.645 5E-1 (5.32E-2) |
| LIRCMOP6 | 0.000 0E+0 (0.00E+0) - | 4.209 0E-3 (1.88E-2) - | 1.115 0E-1 (1.37E-2) - | 4.813 9E-3 (2.15E-2) - | 1.133 2E-1 (1.34E-2) - | 0.000 0E+0 (0.00E+0) - | 1.959 6E-1 (4.28E-4) |
| LIRCMOP7 | 1.948 3E-1 (1.00E-1) - | 2.333 2E-1 (2.64E-2) - | 2.487 4E-1 (9.06E-3) - | 2.270 4E-1 (5.92E-2) - | 2.483 0E-1 (9.46E-3) - | 1.213 6E-2 (5.43E-2) - | 2.883 7E-1 (7.17E-3) |
| LIRCMOP8 | 7.694 0E-2 (1.08E-1) - | 1.211 1E-1 (9.52E-2) - | 2.389 3E-1 (1.53E-2) - | 1.614 2E-1 (9.69E-2) - | 2.339 9E-1 (9.47E-3) - | 0.000 0E+0 (0.00E+0) - | 2.900 5E-1 (8.79E-3) |
| LIRCMOP9 | 1.322 3E-1 (5.98E-2) - | 3.250 1E-1 (5.18E-2) - | 3.467 1E-1 (4.80E-2) - | 4.111 6E-1 (5.63E-2) - | 4.085 0E-1 (7.57E-2) - | 1.601 1E-1 (5.78E-2) - | 5.085 5E-1 (4.09E-2) |
| LIRCMOP10 | 6.086 2E-2 (1.51E-2) - | 5.211 1E-1 (3.92E-2) - | 6.263 7E-1 (2.30E-2) - | 3.115 7E-1 (1.57E-1) - | 5.648 4E-1 (5.45E-2) - | 1.529 2E-1 (5.72E-2) - | 7.028 4E-1 (1.64E-3) |
| LIRCMOP11 | 2.306 2E-1 (7.39E-2) - | 6.016 9E-1 (2.39E-2) - | 6.631 3E-1 (1.89E-2) - | 3.389 7E-1 (1.02E-1) - | 6.467 9E-1 (2.13E-2) - | 2.101 9E-1 (1.41E-1) - | 6.915 0E-1 (5.27E-4) |
| LIRCMOP12 | 3.083 9E-1 (1.24E-1) - | 4.794 8E-1 (5.16E-2) - | 5.161 3E-1 (4.54E-2) - | 4.922 0E-1 (4.04E-2) - | 5.252 1E-1 (4.63E-2) - | 3.322 4E-1 (1.01E-1) - | 5.966 8E-1 (3.31E-2) |
| LIRCMOP13 | 1.002 6E-4 (1.11E-4) - | 5.466 4E-1 (1.23E-3) + | 5.539 3E-1 (1.23E-3) + | 1.094 0E-4 (1.24E-4) - | 5.548 7E-1 (1.40E-3) + | 2.515 5E-6 (1.12E-5) - | 4.959 1E-1 (1.77E-3) |
| LIRCMOP14 | 3.877 7E-4 (2.63E-4) - | 5.460 5E-1 (8.64E-4) - | 5.533 1E-1 (1.33E-3) + | 5.700 0E-4 (2.78E-4) - | 5.546 5E-1 (1.09E-3) + | 1.008 8E-4 (2.41E-4) - | 5.524 1E-1 (1.01E-3) |
Tab. 4 HV values of seven algorithms on LIRCMOP benchmark problems
| 问题 | BiCo | C-TAEA | CCMO | NRC2 | c-DPEA | IM-C-MOEA/D | IACMEA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIRCMOP1 | 1.379 1E-1 (9.54E-3) - | 1.167 2E-1 (2.58E-2) - | 1.230 2E-1 (1.87E-2) - | 1.616 6E-1 (7.39E-3) - | 1.641 5E-1 (1.20E-2) - | 1.053 4E-1 (1.03E-2) - | 2.018 5E-1 (2.05E-2) |
| LIRCMOP2 | 2.595 8E-1 (1.12E-2) - | 2.570 4E-1 (3.47E-2) - | 2.388 7E-1 (1.67E-2) - | 2.952 7E-1 (9.04E-3) - | 2.890 0E-1 (1.27E-2) - | 2.249 2E-1 (2.33E-2) - | 3.421 7E-1 (6.82E-3) |
| LIRCMOP3 | 1.228 1E-1 (1.05E-2) - | 9.086 0E-2 (1.82E-2) - | 1.079 7E-1 (1.98E-2) - | 1.525 3E-1 (1.26E-2) - | 1.471 4E-1 (1.25E-2) - | 9.359 9E-2 (7.50E-3) - | 1.893 4E-1 (5.82E-3) |
| LIRCMOP4 | 2.214 5E-1 (9.79E-3) - | 1.841 4E-1 (1.62E-2) - | 2.059 5E-1 (2.19E-2) - | 2.552 0E-1 (1.43E-2) - | 2.528 5E-1 (1.89E-2) - | 1.879 4E-1 (1.19E-2) - | 2.962 5E-1 (7.23E-3) |
| LIRCMOP5 | 0.000 0E+0 (0.00E+0) - | 2.270 8E-2 (5.57E-2) - | 1.635 0E-1 (2.61E-2) - | 0.000 0E+0 (0.00E+0) - | 1.517 0E-1 (2.78E-2) - | 0.000 0E+0 (0.00E+0) - | 2.645 5E-1 (5.32E-2) |
| LIRCMOP6 | 0.000 0E+0 (0.00E+0) - | 4.209 0E-3 (1.88E-2) - | 1.115 0E-1 (1.37E-2) - | 4.813 9E-3 (2.15E-2) - | 1.133 2E-1 (1.34E-2) - | 0.000 0E+0 (0.00E+0) - | 1.959 6E-1 (4.28E-4) |
| LIRCMOP7 | 1.948 3E-1 (1.00E-1) - | 2.333 2E-1 (2.64E-2) - | 2.487 4E-1 (9.06E-3) - | 2.270 4E-1 (5.92E-2) - | 2.483 0E-1 (9.46E-3) - | 1.213 6E-2 (5.43E-2) - | 2.883 7E-1 (7.17E-3) |
| LIRCMOP8 | 7.694 0E-2 (1.08E-1) - | 1.211 1E-1 (9.52E-2) - | 2.389 3E-1 (1.53E-2) - | 1.614 2E-1 (9.69E-2) - | 2.339 9E-1 (9.47E-3) - | 0.000 0E+0 (0.00E+0) - | 2.900 5E-1 (8.79E-3) |
| LIRCMOP9 | 1.322 3E-1 (5.98E-2) - | 3.250 1E-1 (5.18E-2) - | 3.467 1E-1 (4.80E-2) - | 4.111 6E-1 (5.63E-2) - | 4.085 0E-1 (7.57E-2) - | 1.601 1E-1 (5.78E-2) - | 5.085 5E-1 (4.09E-2) |
| LIRCMOP10 | 6.086 2E-2 (1.51E-2) - | 5.211 1E-1 (3.92E-2) - | 6.263 7E-1 (2.30E-2) - | 3.115 7E-1 (1.57E-1) - | 5.648 4E-1 (5.45E-2) - | 1.529 2E-1 (5.72E-2) - | 7.028 4E-1 (1.64E-3) |
| LIRCMOP11 | 2.306 2E-1 (7.39E-2) - | 6.016 9E-1 (2.39E-2) - | 6.631 3E-1 (1.89E-2) - | 3.389 7E-1 (1.02E-1) - | 6.467 9E-1 (2.13E-2) - | 2.101 9E-1 (1.41E-1) - | 6.915 0E-1 (5.27E-4) |
| LIRCMOP12 | 3.083 9E-1 (1.24E-1) - | 4.794 8E-1 (5.16E-2) - | 5.161 3E-1 (4.54E-2) - | 4.922 0E-1 (4.04E-2) - | 5.252 1E-1 (4.63E-2) - | 3.322 4E-1 (1.01E-1) - | 5.966 8E-1 (3.31E-2) |
| LIRCMOP13 | 1.002 6E-4 (1.11E-4) - | 5.466 4E-1 (1.23E-3) + | 5.539 3E-1 (1.23E-3) + | 1.094 0E-4 (1.24E-4) - | 5.548 7E-1 (1.40E-3) + | 2.515 5E-6 (1.12E-5) - | 4.959 1E-1 (1.77E-3) |
| LIRCMOP14 | 3.877 7E-4 (2.63E-4) - | 5.460 5E-1 (8.64E-4) - | 5.533 1E-1 (1.33E-3) + | 5.700 0E-4 (2.78E-4) - | 5.546 5E-1 (1.09E-3) + | 1.008 8E-4 (2.41E-4) - | 5.524 1E-1 (1.01E-3) |
| 问题 | BiCo | C-TAEA | CCMO | NRC2 | c-DPEA | IM-C-MOEA/D | IACMEA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DASCMOP1 | 7.157 7E-1 (4.62E-2) - | 1.912 5E-1 (2.60E-2) - | 7.234 7E-1 (2.79E-2) - | 6.672 8E-1 (4.75E-2) - | 6.711 1E-1 (5.53E-2) - | 7.934 4E-1 (3.87E-2) - | 1.049 4E-2 (4.37E-3) |
| DASCMOP2 | 2.447 2E-1 (1.94E-2) - | 8.846 4E-2 (2.38E-2) - | 2.382 9E-1 (2.21E-2) - | 2.097 8E-1 (2.32E-2) - | 2.155 7E-1 (1.79E-2) - | 6.285 3E-1 (2.36E-1) - | 6.319 9E-3 (3.28E-4) |
| DASCMOP3 | 3.003 3E-1 (5.60E-2) - | 1.371 4E-1 (2.65E-2) - | 3.430 9E-1 (4.60E-2) - | 2.634 2E-1 (3.44E-2) - | 2.956 8E-1 (5.80E-2) - | 5.414 7E-1 (2.25E-1) - | 4.024 3E-2 (5.45E-2) |
| DASCMOP4 | 5.200 5E-2 (1.01E-1) + | 1.191 4E-2 (2.80E-3) + | 1.734 9E-3 (1.18E-3) + | 1.443 0E-3 (1.59E-4) + | 2.009 2E-3 (1.33E-3) + | NaN | 6.539 8E-1 (2.71E-1) |
| DASCMOP5 | 8.241 2E-2 (1.67E-1) + | 7.480 7E-3 (5.68E-4) + | 2.724 9E-3 (4.65E-5) + | 2.827 4E-2 (6.26E-2) + | 2.866 2E-3 (1.63E-4) + | 7.688 1E-1 (1.04E-1) = | 6.067 1E-1 (2.02E-1) |
| DASCMOP6 | 1.170 3E-1 (1.38E-1) + | 2.438 0E-2 (4.37E-3) + | 3.505 2E-2 (3.71E-2) + | 1.294 7E-1 (1.51E-1) + | 1.916 8E-2 (1.54E-3) + | 7.478 5E-1 (1.72E-1) = | 7.016 4E-1 (2.28E-1) |
| DASCMOP7 | 3.206 0E-2 (9.18E-4) + | 3.810 9E-2 (1.19E-3) + | 3.069 2E-2 (8.82E-4) + | 3.189 2E-2 (7.22E-4) + | 3.209 1E-2 (9.44E-4) + | 9.505 8E-1 (2.79E-1) = | 8.419 7E-1 (2.13E-1) |
| DASCMOP8 | 4.098 5E-2 (1.28E-3) + | 5.983 2E-2 (1.44E-2) + | 3.992 8E-2 (8.22E-4) + | 3.991 5E-2 (1.14E-3) + | 4.201 6E-2 (2.07E-3) + | 8.669 1E-1 (3.45E-1) = | 7.607 2E-1 (3.13E-1) |
| DASCMOP9 | 3.141 4E-1 (3.09E-2) - | 2.360 7E-1 (4.77E-2) - | 3.160 5E-1 (7.32E-2) - | 2.478 9E-1 (5.44E-2) - | 2.118 0E-1 (9.64E-2) - | 5.185 6E-1 (1.37E-1) - | 4.594 2E-2 (1.68E-3) |
Tab. 5 IGD values of seven algorithms on DASCMOP benchmark problems
| 问题 | BiCo | C-TAEA | CCMO | NRC2 | c-DPEA | IM-C-MOEA/D | IACMEA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DASCMOP1 | 7.157 7E-1 (4.62E-2) - | 1.912 5E-1 (2.60E-2) - | 7.234 7E-1 (2.79E-2) - | 6.672 8E-1 (4.75E-2) - | 6.711 1E-1 (5.53E-2) - | 7.934 4E-1 (3.87E-2) - | 1.049 4E-2 (4.37E-3) |
| DASCMOP2 | 2.447 2E-1 (1.94E-2) - | 8.846 4E-2 (2.38E-2) - | 2.382 9E-1 (2.21E-2) - | 2.097 8E-1 (2.32E-2) - | 2.155 7E-1 (1.79E-2) - | 6.285 3E-1 (2.36E-1) - | 6.319 9E-3 (3.28E-4) |
| DASCMOP3 | 3.003 3E-1 (5.60E-2) - | 1.371 4E-1 (2.65E-2) - | 3.430 9E-1 (4.60E-2) - | 2.634 2E-1 (3.44E-2) - | 2.956 8E-1 (5.80E-2) - | 5.414 7E-1 (2.25E-1) - | 4.024 3E-2 (5.45E-2) |
| DASCMOP4 | 5.200 5E-2 (1.01E-1) + | 1.191 4E-2 (2.80E-3) + | 1.734 9E-3 (1.18E-3) + | 1.443 0E-3 (1.59E-4) + | 2.009 2E-3 (1.33E-3) + | NaN | 6.539 8E-1 (2.71E-1) |
| DASCMOP5 | 8.241 2E-2 (1.67E-1) + | 7.480 7E-3 (5.68E-4) + | 2.724 9E-3 (4.65E-5) + | 2.827 4E-2 (6.26E-2) + | 2.866 2E-3 (1.63E-4) + | 7.688 1E-1 (1.04E-1) = | 6.067 1E-1 (2.02E-1) |
| DASCMOP6 | 1.170 3E-1 (1.38E-1) + | 2.438 0E-2 (4.37E-3) + | 3.505 2E-2 (3.71E-2) + | 1.294 7E-1 (1.51E-1) + | 1.916 8E-2 (1.54E-3) + | 7.478 5E-1 (1.72E-1) = | 7.016 4E-1 (2.28E-1) |
| DASCMOP7 | 3.206 0E-2 (9.18E-4) + | 3.810 9E-2 (1.19E-3) + | 3.069 2E-2 (8.82E-4) + | 3.189 2E-2 (7.22E-4) + | 3.209 1E-2 (9.44E-4) + | 9.505 8E-1 (2.79E-1) = | 8.419 7E-1 (2.13E-1) |
| DASCMOP8 | 4.098 5E-2 (1.28E-3) + | 5.983 2E-2 (1.44E-2) + | 3.992 8E-2 (8.22E-4) + | 3.991 5E-2 (1.14E-3) + | 4.201 6E-2 (2.07E-3) + | 8.669 1E-1 (3.45E-1) = | 7.607 2E-1 (3.13E-1) |
| DASCMOP9 | 3.141 4E-1 (3.09E-2) - | 2.360 7E-1 (4.77E-2) - | 3.160 5E-1 (7.32E-2) - | 2.478 9E-1 (5.44E-2) - | 2.118 0E-1 (9.64E-2) - | 5.185 6E-1 (1.37E-1) - | 4.594 2E-2 (1.68E-3) |
| 问题 | BiCo | C-TAEA | CCMO | NRC2 | c-DPEA | IM-C-MOEA/D | IACMEA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DASCMOP1 | 1.061 2E-2 (7.62E-3) - | 1.656 7E-1 (1.12E-2) - | 7.887 4E-3 (5.46E-3) - | 1.758 8E-2 (7.71E-3) - | 1.954 6E-2 (1.42E-2) - | 1.763 1E-3 (4.11E-3) - | 2.086 0E-1 (1.41E-3) |
| DASCMOP2 | 2.524 0E-1 (4.07E-3) - | 3.073 5E-1 (7.73E-3) - | 2.586 9E-1 (2.19E-3) - | 2.654 7E-1 (6.27E-3) - | 2.630 9E-1 (5.13E-3) - | 8.809 4E-2 (9.68E-2) - | 3.536 8E-1 (2.47E-4) |
| DASCMOP3 | 2.138 6E-1 (6.77E-3) - | 2.549 2E-1 (7.03E-3) - | 2.130 8E-1 (1.38E-2) - | 2.304 5E-1 (1.94E-2) - | 2.190 5E-1 (1.53E-2) - | 1.207 3E-1 (1.00E-1) - | 3.013 8E-1 (2.11E-2) |
| DASCMOP4 | 1.832 8E-1 (3.98E-2) + | 1.957 0E-1 (5.47E-3) + | 2.025 6E-1 (3.45E-3) + | 2.038 4E-1 (3.04E-4) + | 2.019 0E-1 (3.75E-3) + | NaN | 1.898 8E-2 (2.34E-2) |
| DASCMOP5 | 3.044 3E-1 (9.76E-2) + | 3.480 7E-1 (6.27E-4) + | 3.515 9E-1 (7.47E-5) + | 3.333 6E-1 (4.36E-2) + | 3.513 0E-1 (2.41E-4) + | 2.320 0E-2 (1.51E-2) = | 6.376 3E-2 (5.50E-2) |
| DASCMOP6 | 2.583 5E-1 (7.87E-2) + | 3.081 4E-1 (1.38E-3) + | 3.044 9E-1 (1.46E-2) + | 2.499 1E-1 (8.40E-2) + | 3.121 5E-1 (3.01E-4) + | 2.681 8E-2 (1.61E-2) = | 3.462 0E-2 (3.32E-2) |
| DASCMOP7 | 2.875 7E-1 (7.07E-4) + | 2.877 3E-1 (1.72E-4) + | 2.887 1E-1 (3.52E-4) + | 2.871 0E-1 (3.48E-4) + | 2.872 5E-1 (4.80E-4) + | 2.149 2E-2 (4.11E-2) = | 2.619 3E-2 (4.34E-2) |
| DASCMOP8 | 2.063 4E-1 (5.45E-4) + | 2.025 9E-1 (3.18E-3) + | 2.073 6E-1 (4.58E-4) + | 2.060 0E-1 (4.13E-4) + | 2.062 2E-1 (5.73E-4) + | 1.803 8E-2 (3.55E-2) = | 1.080 3E-2 (2.63E-2) |
| DASCMOP9 | 1.336 1E-1 (5.33E-3) - | 1.476 2E-1 (1.06E-2) - | 1.370 2E-1 (1.24E-2) - | 1.498 3E-1 (1.11E-2) - | 1.604 3E-1 (2.14E-2) - | 9.831 1E-2 (2.21E-2) - | 2.015 8E-1 (5.76E-4) |
Tab. 6 HV values of seven algorithms on DASCMOP benchmark problems
| 问题 | BiCo | C-TAEA | CCMO | NRC2 | c-DPEA | IM-C-MOEA/D | IACMEA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DASCMOP1 | 1.061 2E-2 (7.62E-3) - | 1.656 7E-1 (1.12E-2) - | 7.887 4E-3 (5.46E-3) - | 1.758 8E-2 (7.71E-3) - | 1.954 6E-2 (1.42E-2) - | 1.763 1E-3 (4.11E-3) - | 2.086 0E-1 (1.41E-3) |
| DASCMOP2 | 2.524 0E-1 (4.07E-3) - | 3.073 5E-1 (7.73E-3) - | 2.586 9E-1 (2.19E-3) - | 2.654 7E-1 (6.27E-3) - | 2.630 9E-1 (5.13E-3) - | 8.809 4E-2 (9.68E-2) - | 3.536 8E-1 (2.47E-4) |
| DASCMOP3 | 2.138 6E-1 (6.77E-3) - | 2.549 2E-1 (7.03E-3) - | 2.130 8E-1 (1.38E-2) - | 2.304 5E-1 (1.94E-2) - | 2.190 5E-1 (1.53E-2) - | 1.207 3E-1 (1.00E-1) - | 3.013 8E-1 (2.11E-2) |
| DASCMOP4 | 1.832 8E-1 (3.98E-2) + | 1.957 0E-1 (5.47E-3) + | 2.025 6E-1 (3.45E-3) + | 2.038 4E-1 (3.04E-4) + | 2.019 0E-1 (3.75E-3) + | NaN | 1.898 8E-2 (2.34E-2) |
| DASCMOP5 | 3.044 3E-1 (9.76E-2) + | 3.480 7E-1 (6.27E-4) + | 3.515 9E-1 (7.47E-5) + | 3.333 6E-1 (4.36E-2) + | 3.513 0E-1 (2.41E-4) + | 2.320 0E-2 (1.51E-2) = | 6.376 3E-2 (5.50E-2) |
| DASCMOP6 | 2.583 5E-1 (7.87E-2) + | 3.081 4E-1 (1.38E-3) + | 3.044 9E-1 (1.46E-2) + | 2.499 1E-1 (8.40E-2) + | 3.121 5E-1 (3.01E-4) + | 2.681 8E-2 (1.61E-2) = | 3.462 0E-2 (3.32E-2) |
| DASCMOP7 | 2.875 7E-1 (7.07E-4) + | 2.877 3E-1 (1.72E-4) + | 2.887 1E-1 (3.52E-4) + | 2.871 0E-1 (3.48E-4) + | 2.872 5E-1 (4.80E-4) + | 2.149 2E-2 (4.11E-2) = | 2.619 3E-2 (4.34E-2) |
| DASCMOP8 | 2.063 4E-1 (5.45E-4) + | 2.025 9E-1 (3.18E-3) + | 2.073 6E-1 (4.58E-4) + | 2.060 0E-1 (4.13E-4) + | 2.062 2E-1 (5.73E-4) + | 1.803 8E-2 (3.55E-2) = | 1.080 3E-2 (2.63E-2) |
| DASCMOP9 | 1.336 1E-1 (5.33E-3) - | 1.476 2E-1 (1.06E-2) - | 1.370 2E-1 (1.24E-2) - | 1.498 3E-1 (1.11E-2) - | 1.604 3E-1 (2.14E-2) - | 9.831 1E-2 (2.21E-2) - | 2.015 8E-1 (5.76E-4) |
| 问题 | BiCo | C-TAEA | CCMO | NRC2 | c-DPEA | IM-C-MOEA/D | IACMEA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CF1 | 15.33 | 32.11 | 11.46 | 30.19 | 15.45 | 25.39 | 5.86 |
| CF2 | 9.44 | 29.54 | 13.04 | 15.41 | 31.58 | 38.52 | 7.48 |
| CF3 | 11.86 | 36.96 | 17.84 | 19.01 | 43.60 | 22.45 | 8.99 |
| CF4 | 39.50 | 56.66 | 12.48 | 11.88 | 58.66 | 15.26 | 6.08 |
| CF5 | 13.09 | 147.22 | 38.87 | 10.96 | 112.58 | 34.12 | 18.52 |
| CF6 | 10.28 | 119.22 | 23.64 | 42.82 | 40.34 | 26.38 | 8.73 |
| CF7 | 13.86 | 157.64 | 10.94 | 8.93 | 32.98 | 19.25 | 16.57 |
| CF8 | 19.98 | 52.97 | 16.12 | 17.49 | 41.52 | 32.88 | 13.03 |
| CF9 | 14.87 | 65.66 | 20.89 | 41.79 | 27.64 | 34.13 | 11.42 |
| CF10 | 30.37 | 87.56 | 30.84 | 33.19 | 31.92 | 18.78 | 27.97 |
Tab. 7 Average running time of seven algorithms on CF benchmark problems
| 问题 | BiCo | C-TAEA | CCMO | NRC2 | c-DPEA | IM-C-MOEA/D | IACMEA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CF1 | 15.33 | 32.11 | 11.46 | 30.19 | 15.45 | 25.39 | 5.86 |
| CF2 | 9.44 | 29.54 | 13.04 | 15.41 | 31.58 | 38.52 | 7.48 |
| CF3 | 11.86 | 36.96 | 17.84 | 19.01 | 43.60 | 22.45 | 8.99 |
| CF4 | 39.50 | 56.66 | 12.48 | 11.88 | 58.66 | 15.26 | 6.08 |
| CF5 | 13.09 | 147.22 | 38.87 | 10.96 | 112.58 | 34.12 | 18.52 |
| CF6 | 10.28 | 119.22 | 23.64 | 42.82 | 40.34 | 26.38 | 8.73 |
| CF7 | 13.86 | 157.64 | 10.94 | 8.93 | 32.98 | 19.25 | 16.57 |
| CF8 | 19.98 | 52.97 | 16.12 | 17.49 | 41.52 | 32.88 | 13.03 |
| CF9 | 14.87 | 65.66 | 20.89 | 41.79 | 27.64 | 34.13 | 11.42 |
| CF10 | 30.37 | 87.56 | 30.84 | 33.19 | 31.92 | 18.78 | 27.97 |
| 问题 | BiCo | C-TAEA | CCMO | NRC2 | c-DPEA | IM-C-MOEA/D | IACMEA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LC1 | 19.19 | 80.64 | 20.95 | 18.58 | 16.25 | 30.28 | 7.52 |
| LC2 | 17.64 | 136.62 | 22.51 | 28.82 | 21.51 | 30.19 | 9.79 |
| LC3 | 26.61 | 107.39 | 21.85 | 18.25 | 26.54 | 25.41 | 15.62 |
| LC4 | 22.67 | 92.04 | 21.42 | 30.28 | 19.61 | 29.01 | 16.57 |
| LC5 | 24.94 | 153.65 | 30.96 | 36.81 | 37.40 | 32.71 | 15.88 |
| LC6 | 21.05 | 154.61 | 26.36 | 45.72 | 44.54 | 45.09 | 10.33 |
| LC7 | 15.94 | 173.69 | 26.94 | 36.57 | 40.54 | 51.47 | 8.95 |
| LC8 | 24.62 | 174.91 | 24.16 | 28.04 | 40.94 | 42.82 | 13.47 |
| LC9 | 19.24 | 156.65 | 32.67 | 45.64 | 68.51 | 29.06 | 15.31 |
| LC10 | 19.21 | 79.66 | 21.49 | 33.16 | 42.47 | 37.49 | 9.74 |
| LC11 | 18.75 | 125.59 | 37.11 | 44.59 | 37.73 | 40.43 | 10.75 |
| LC12 | 15.20 | 144.44 | 43.99 | 37.19 | 44.03 | 36.89 | 8.21 |
| LC13 | 36.82 | 103.73 | 77.85 | 28.63 | 14.52 | 58.47 | 24.74 |
| LC14 | 30.63 | 156.99 | 58.93 | 25.43 | 20.27 | 29.48 | 39.90 |
Tab. 8 Average running time of seven algorithms on LC benchmark problems
| 问题 | BiCo | C-TAEA | CCMO | NRC2 | c-DPEA | IM-C-MOEA/D | IACMEA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LC1 | 19.19 | 80.64 | 20.95 | 18.58 | 16.25 | 30.28 | 7.52 |
| LC2 | 17.64 | 136.62 | 22.51 | 28.82 | 21.51 | 30.19 | 9.79 |
| LC3 | 26.61 | 107.39 | 21.85 | 18.25 | 26.54 | 25.41 | 15.62 |
| LC4 | 22.67 | 92.04 | 21.42 | 30.28 | 19.61 | 29.01 | 16.57 |
| LC5 | 24.94 | 153.65 | 30.96 | 36.81 | 37.40 | 32.71 | 15.88 |
| LC6 | 21.05 | 154.61 | 26.36 | 45.72 | 44.54 | 45.09 | 10.33 |
| LC7 | 15.94 | 173.69 | 26.94 | 36.57 | 40.54 | 51.47 | 8.95 |
| LC8 | 24.62 | 174.91 | 24.16 | 28.04 | 40.94 | 42.82 | 13.47 |
| LC9 | 19.24 | 156.65 | 32.67 | 45.64 | 68.51 | 29.06 | 15.31 |
| LC10 | 19.21 | 79.66 | 21.49 | 33.16 | 42.47 | 37.49 | 9.74 |
| LC11 | 18.75 | 125.59 | 37.11 | 44.59 | 37.73 | 40.43 | 10.75 |
| LC12 | 15.20 | 144.44 | 43.99 | 37.19 | 44.03 | 36.89 | 8.21 |
| LC13 | 36.82 | 103.73 | 77.85 | 28.63 | 14.52 | 58.47 | 24.74 |
| LC14 | 30.63 | 156.99 | 58.93 | 25.43 | 20.27 | 29.48 | 39.90 |
| 问题 | IACMEA1 | IACMEA2 | IACMEA3 | IACMEA4 | IACMEA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +/-/= | 0/7/3 | 0/7/3 | 0/7/3 | 0/8/2 | |
| CF1 | 1.23E-02(1.81E-3) - | 7.050 9E-3 (8.83E-4) - | 3.020 4E-3 (3.43E-4) - | 1.11E-02(1.08E-3) - | 2.49E-03(5.66E-04) |
| CF2 | 1.819 8E-2 (9.36E-3) - | 1.825 2E-2 (1.77E-2) - | 1.004 1E-2 (2.09E-3) = | 1.85E-02(1.03E-2) - | 1.64E-02(5.91E-03) |
| CF3 | 1.746 3E-1 (9.36E-2) = | 1.647 7E-1 (7.88E-2) = | 2.003 6E-1 (8.50E-2) = | 1.87E-01(1.06E-1) = | 1.84E-01(7.41E-02) |
| CF4 | 6.987 9E-2 (1.65E-2) - | 5.762 6E-2 (1.98E-2) = | 6.509 0E-2 (1.49E-2) - | 6.77E-02(1.66E-2) - | 8.20E-02(1.65E-02) |
| CF5 | 2.955 8E-1 (1.40E-1) = | 3.120 5E-1 (1.24E-1) - | 2.518 7E-1 (6.43E-2) - | 2.93E-01(1.11E-1) - | 2.47E-01(6.95E-02) |
| CF6 | 7.047 4E-2 (4.37E-2) - | 7.223 3E-2 (3.81E-2) - | 2.830 0E-2 (5.84E-3) = | 6.26E-02(2.95E-2) - | 2.75E-02(5.14E-03) |
| CF7 | 4.164 4E-1 (1.40E-1) - | 4.843 0E-1 (2.35E-1) - | 1.655 4E+0 (4.03E-1) - | 1.87E-01(6.21E-2) = | 1.88E-01(1.17E-01) |
| CF8 | 5.030 5E-1 (7.21E-2) - | 5.441 8E-1 (7.53E-2) - | 5.259 0E-1 (8.97E-2) - | 2.75E-01(7.69E-2) - | 1.45E-01(1.08E-02) |
| CF9 | 1.711 9E-1 (2.41E-2) - | 1.304 4E-1 (1.84E-2) - | 2.025 0E-1 (3.10E-2) - | 1.43E-01(1.67E-2) - | 8.87E-02(4.49E-03) |
| CF10 | 7.679 8E+0 (0.00E+0) = | 9.246 0E+1 (0.00E+0) = | 7.139 8E+0 (6.02E+0) - | 6.92E-01(0.00E+0) - | 3.22E-01(2.79E-01) |
Tab. 9 IGD values of IACMEA and its four variants on CF benchmark problems
| 问题 | IACMEA1 | IACMEA2 | IACMEA3 | IACMEA4 | IACMEA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +/-/= | 0/7/3 | 0/7/3 | 0/7/3 | 0/8/2 | |
| CF1 | 1.23E-02(1.81E-3) - | 7.050 9E-3 (8.83E-4) - | 3.020 4E-3 (3.43E-4) - | 1.11E-02(1.08E-3) - | 2.49E-03(5.66E-04) |
| CF2 | 1.819 8E-2 (9.36E-3) - | 1.825 2E-2 (1.77E-2) - | 1.004 1E-2 (2.09E-3) = | 1.85E-02(1.03E-2) - | 1.64E-02(5.91E-03) |
| CF3 | 1.746 3E-1 (9.36E-2) = | 1.647 7E-1 (7.88E-2) = | 2.003 6E-1 (8.50E-2) = | 1.87E-01(1.06E-1) = | 1.84E-01(7.41E-02) |
| CF4 | 6.987 9E-2 (1.65E-2) - | 5.762 6E-2 (1.98E-2) = | 6.509 0E-2 (1.49E-2) - | 6.77E-02(1.66E-2) - | 8.20E-02(1.65E-02) |
| CF5 | 2.955 8E-1 (1.40E-1) = | 3.120 5E-1 (1.24E-1) - | 2.518 7E-1 (6.43E-2) - | 2.93E-01(1.11E-1) - | 2.47E-01(6.95E-02) |
| CF6 | 7.047 4E-2 (4.37E-2) - | 7.223 3E-2 (3.81E-2) - | 2.830 0E-2 (5.84E-3) = | 6.26E-02(2.95E-2) - | 2.75E-02(5.14E-03) |
| CF7 | 4.164 4E-1 (1.40E-1) - | 4.843 0E-1 (2.35E-1) - | 1.655 4E+0 (4.03E-1) - | 1.87E-01(6.21E-2) = | 1.88E-01(1.17E-01) |
| CF8 | 5.030 5E-1 (7.21E-2) - | 5.441 8E-1 (7.53E-2) - | 5.259 0E-1 (8.97E-2) - | 2.75E-01(7.69E-2) - | 1.45E-01(1.08E-02) |
| CF9 | 1.711 9E-1 (2.41E-2) - | 1.304 4E-1 (1.84E-2) - | 2.025 0E-1 (3.10E-2) - | 1.43E-01(1.67E-2) - | 8.87E-02(4.49E-03) |
| CF10 | 7.679 8E+0 (0.00E+0) = | 9.246 0E+1 (0.00E+0) = | 7.139 8E+0 (6.02E+0) - | 6.92E-01(0.00E+0) - | 3.22E-01(2.79E-01) |
| 实际问题 | BiCo | C-TAEA | CCMO | NRC2 | c-DPEA | IM-C-MOEA/D | IACMEA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +/-/= | 0/2/0 | 0/2/0 | 0/2/0 | 0/2/0 | 0/2/0 | 0/2/0 | |
3电平逆变器的 同步最优脉宽调制 | 5.601 8E-1 (1.17E-1) - | 5.245 3E-1 (2.43E-1)- | 5.707 6E-1 (1.21E-1) - | 7.174 4E-1 (5.26E-2) - | 5.866 6E-1 (1.17E-1)- | 6.526 3E-1 (2.11E-1)- | 8.242 9E-1 (3.66E-2) |
5电平逆变器的 同步最优脉宽调制 | 5.386 1E-1 (2.90E-1)- | 0.000 0E+0 (0.00E+0)- | 4.841 5E-1 (3.11E-1)- | 8.098 4E-1 (1.21E-2) - | 4.075 1E-1 (3.02E-1)- | 4.622 4E-1 (3.12E-1)- | 9.365 4E-1 (1.68E-2) |
Tab. 10 HV values of IACMEA and comparison algorithms on SOPWM problems
| 实际问题 | BiCo | C-TAEA | CCMO | NRC2 | c-DPEA | IM-C-MOEA/D | IACMEA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +/-/= | 0/2/0 | 0/2/0 | 0/2/0 | 0/2/0 | 0/2/0 | 0/2/0 | |
3电平逆变器的 同步最优脉宽调制 | 5.601 8E-1 (1.17E-1) - | 5.245 3E-1 (2.43E-1)- | 5.707 6E-1 (1.21E-1) - | 7.174 4E-1 (5.26E-2) - | 5.866 6E-1 (1.17E-1)- | 6.526 3E-1 (2.11E-1)- | 8.242 9E-1 (3.66E-2) |
5电平逆变器的 同步最优脉宽调制 | 5.386 1E-1 (2.90E-1)- | 0.000 0E+0 (0.00E+0)- | 4.841 5E-1 (3.11E-1)- | 8.098 4E-1 (1.21E-2) - | 4.075 1E-1 (3.02E-1)- | 4.622 4E-1 (3.12E-1)- | 9.365 4E-1 (1.68E-2) |
| [1] | Wang J, Tian H, Lei D. A feedback-based artificial bee colony algorithm for energy-efficient flexible flow shop scheduling problem[J]. Applied Soft Computing, 2024, 153: No.111254. |
| [2] | 李可,马赛,戴朋林,等. 基于多目标深度强化学习的车车通信无线资源分配算法[J]. 计算机研究与发展, 2024, 61(9): 2229-2245. |
| Li Ke, Ma Sai, Dai Penglin, et al. Wireless resource allocation algorithm based on multi-objective deep reinforcement learning for vehicle-to-vehicle communications [J]. Journal of Computer Research and Development, 2024, 61(9): 2229-2245. | |
| [3] | Qi R, Yen G G. Hybrid bi-objective portfolio optimization with pre-selection strategy [J]. Information Sciences, 2017, 417: 401-419. |
| [4] | Liang J, Ban X, Yu K, et al. A survey on evolutionary constrained multiobjective optimization [J]. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2023, 27(2): 201-221. |
| [5] | Qiao K, Yu K, Qu B, et al. Feature extraction for recommendation of constrained multiobjective evolutionary algorithms[J]. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2023, 27(4): 949-963. |
| [6] | 陈少淼,陈瑞,梁伟,等. 面向复杂约束优化问题的进化算法综述[J]. 软件学报, 2023, 34(2): 556-581. |
| Chen Shaomiao, Chen Rui, Liang Wei, et al. Overview of evolutionary algorithms for complex constrained optimization problems[J]. Journal of Software, 2023, 34(2): 556-581. | |
| [7] | Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, et al. A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-Ⅱ [J]. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2002, 6(2): 182-197. |
| [8] | Fan Z, Wang Z, Li W, et al. Push and pull search embedded in an M2M framework for solving constrained multi-objective optimization problems [J]. Swarm and Evolutionary Computation, 2020, 54: No.100651. |
| [9] | Deb K. An efficient constraint handling method for genetic algorithms [J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2000, 186(2/3/4): 311-338. |
| [10] | Runarsson T P, Yao X. Stochastic ranking for constrained evolutionary optimization [J]. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2000, 4(3): 284-294. |
| [11] | 王勇,蔡自兴,周育人,等. 约束优化进化算法[J]. 软件学报, 2009, 20(1): 11-29. |
| Wang Yong, Cai Zixing, Zhou Yuren, et al. Constrained optimization evolutionary algorithms [J]. Journal of Software, 2009, 20(1): 11-29. | |
| [12] | Zhou J, Zhang Y, Wang J, et al. Localized constrained-domination principle for constrained multiobjective optimization[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 2024, 54(3): 1376-1387. |
| [13] | Ma Z, Wang Y. Shift-based penalty for evolutionary constrained multiobjective optimization and its application [J]. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 2023, 53(1): 18-30. |
| [14] | Zhang C, Qin A K, Shen W, et al. ε -Constrained differential evolution using an adaptive ε -level control method [J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 2022, 52(2): 769-785. |
| [15] | Ming F, Xue B, Zhang M, et al. Constrained multiobjective optimization via relaxations on both constraints and objectives [J]. IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence, 2024, 5(12): 6709-6722. |
| [16] | Wang B C, Qin Y, Meng X B, et al. ATM-R: an adaptive tradeoff model with reference points for constrained multiobjective evolutionary optimization [J]. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 2024, 54(8): 4475-4488. |
| [17] | Liu Z Z, Wang B C, Tang K, et al. Handling constrained multiobjective optimization problems via bidirectional coevolution[J]. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 2022, 52(10): 10163-10176. |
| [18] | 张祥飞,鲁宇明,张平生. 基于协同进化的约束多目标优化算法[J]. 计算机应用, 2021, 41(7): 2012-2018. |
| Zhang Xiangfei, Lu Yuming, Zhang Pingsheng. Constrained multi-objective optimization algorithm based on coevolution [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2021, 41(7): 2012-2018. | |
| [19] | Liu S, Feng J, Yang S, et al. A coevolutionary algorithm with detection and supervision strategies for constrained multiobjective optimization [J]. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2025, 29(6): 2343-2356. |
| [20] | 韩美慧,王鹏,李瑞旭,等. 一种基于协同演化的自适应约束多目标进化算法[J]. 计算机工程, 2024, 50(6): 124-137. |
| Han Meihui, Wang Peng, Li Ruixu, et al. An adaptive constrained multi-objective evolutionary algorithm based on co-evolutionary[J]. Computer Engineering, 2024, 50(6): 124-137. | |
| [21] | Guo F, Li H. A niche-based evolutionary algorithm with dual cooperative archive for solving constrained multi-objective optimization problems [J]. Egyptian Informatics Journal, 2024, 25: No.100422. |
| [22] | Meng X, Li H. An adaptive co-evolutionary competitive particle swarm optimizer for constrained multi-objective optimization problems [J]. Swarm and Evolutionary Computation, 2024, 91: No.101746. |
| [23] | Li K, Chen R, Fu G, et al. Two-archive evolutionary algorithm for constrained multiobjective optimization [J]. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2019, 23(2): 303-315. |
| [24] | Tian Y, Zhang T, Xiao J, et al. A coevolutionary framework for constrained multiobjective optimization problems [J]. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2021, 25(1): 102-116. |
| [25] | Liu Z Z, Qin Y, Song W, et al. Multiobjective-based constraint-handling technique for evolutionary constrained multiobjective optimization: a new perspective [J]. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2023, 27(5): 1370-1384. |
| [26] | Ming M, Trivedi A, Wang R. A dual population-based evolutionary algorithm for constrained multiobjective optimization[J]. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2021, 25(4): 739-753. |
| [27] | Farias L R C, Araújo A F R. An inverse modeling constrained multi-objective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition[C]// SMC 2024. Piscataway: IEEE, 2024: 3727-3732. |
| [28] | Zhang Q, Zhou A, Zhao S, et al. Multiobjective optimization test instance for the CEC 2009 special session and competition: CES-487 [R/OL]. (2009-04-20) [2025-05-22]. . |
| [29] | Fan Z, Li W, Cai X, et al. Difficulty adjustable and scalable constrained multiobjective test problem toolkit [J]. Evolutionary Computation, 2020, 28(3): 339-378. |
| [30] | Fan Z, Li W, Cai X, et al. An improved epsilon constraint-handing method in MOEA/D for CMOPs with large infeasible regions [J]. Soft Computing, 2019, 23(23): 12491-12510. |
| [31] | Tian Y, Cheng R, Zhang X, et al. PlatEMO: a MATLAB platform for evolutionary multi-objective optimization [Educational Forum][J]. IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine, 2017, 12(4): 73-87. |
| [32] | Pan L Q, Xu W T, Li H L, et al. Adaptive simulated binary crossover for rotated multi-objective optimization [J]. Swarm and Evolutionary Computation, 2021, 60: No.100759. |
| [33] | Deb K, Goyal M. A combined Genetic Adaptive Search (GeneAS) for engineering design [J]. Computer Science and Informatics, 1996, 26: 30-45. |
| [34] | Franquelo L G, Napoles J, Guisado R C P, et al. A flexible selective harmonic mitigation technique to meet grid codes in three-level PWM converters[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2007, 54(6): 3022-3029. |
| [1] | Zeyu TANG, Xiaoyi WEN, Zaipeng XIE. Diffusion-guided evolutionary neural architecture search algorithm [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2026, 46(8): 2411-2420. |
| [2] | Yu LI, Xuegang CHEN. Master-apprentice evolutionary algorithm based on improved local search for minimum weakly connected dominating set problem [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2026, 46(7): 2239-2249. |
| [3] | Zichen TIAN, Qinming LIU, Chunming YE, Yujie WANG. Location optimization model for ride-hailing vehicle charging stations considering temporal variability [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2026, 46(7): 2216-2228. |
| [4] | Menghua WANG, Yukun DONG, Long CHENG, Junqi SUN. Human dimension attention regressor method for monocular occluded human mesh recovery [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2026, 46(6): 1981-1988. |
| [5] | Jinglei GUO, Shiyuan LIU, Shouyong JIANG. Subregion-based many-objective evolutionary algorithm [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2026, 46(4): 1199-1210. |
| [6] | Suling XUE, Jinxu HE, Wenjie WEI, Yingying HE, Lu LOU. Fast neural implicit surface reconstruction based on dynamic occupancy grid [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2026, 46(3): 907-914. |
| [7] | Jixin GUO, Ting ZHANG. Transformer image dehazing based on component collaborative optimization pruning [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2026, 46(3): 933-939. |
| [8] | Chunyu ZHANG, Jianchang LIU, Yuanchao LIU, Wei ZHANG. Two-stage infill sampling-based expensive multi-objective evolutionary algorithm [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2026, 46(2): 485-496. |
| [9] | Qianlong XIONG, Jin QIN. Neural network architecture search algorithm guided by hybrid heuristic information [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2026, 46(2): 395-405. |
| [10] | Ao SHEN, Ruizhang HUANG, Jingjing XUE, Yanping CHEN, Yongbin QIN. Deep variational text clustering model based on distribution augmentation [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2025, 45(8): 2457-2463. |
| [11] | Zhichao YUAN, Lei YANG, Jinglin TIAN, Xiaowei WEI, Kangshun LI. Dual-population dual-stage evolutionary algorithm for complex constrained multi-objective optimization problems [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2025, 45(8): 2656-2665. |
| [12] | Hansong ZHANG, Yichao HE, Fei SUN, Guoxin CHEN, Ju CHEN. Improved ring theory-based evolutionary algorithm with new repair optimization operator for solving multi-dimensional knapsack problem [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2025, 45(5): 1595-1604. |
| [13] | Shujian GUO, Jieyue YU, Xuesong YIN. Graph regularized elastic net subspace clustering [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2025, 45(5): 1464-1471. |
| [14] | Zhenyuan LIANG, Songlin JIANG, Songhao ZHU. Self-supervised image denoising based on blind-ring network and random recovery mask [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2025, 45(10): 3311-3319. |
| [15] | Yi ZHOU, Hua GAO, Yongshen TIAN. Proximal policy optimization algorithm based on clipping optimization and policy guidance [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2024, 44(8): 2334-2341. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||