Journal of Computer Applications ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (2): 659-665.DOI: 10.11772/j.issn.1001-9081.2025020243
• Frontier and comprehensive applications • Previous Articles
Haifeng LI1, Wenqiang LIU1, Nansha LI1(
), Zhongcheng GUI2
Received:2025-03-12
Revised:2025-04-18
Accepted:2025-04-28
Online:2025-05-16
Published:2026-02-10
Contact:
Nansha LI
About author:LI Haifeng, born in 1984, Ph. D., professor. His research interests include robot environmental perception, computer vision.Supported by:通讯作者:
李南莎
作者简介:李海丰(1984—),男,内蒙古通辽人,教授,博士,CCF会员,主要研究方向:机器人环境感知、计算机视觉基金资助:CLC Number:
Haifeng LI, Wenqiang LIU, Nansha LI, Zhongcheng GUI. Ground penetrating radar clutter suppression algorithm for airport runways[J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2026, 46(2): 659-665.
李海丰, 刘文强, 李南莎, 桂仲成. 面向机场跑道的探地雷达杂波抑制算法[J]. 《计算机应用》唯一官方网站, 2026, 46(2): 659-665.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.joca.cn/EN/10.11772/j.issn.1001-9081.2025020243
| 背景 | 仿真 | 合成数据 | 真实数据 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 训练 | 测试 | 测试 | ||
| 83 | 1 628 | 1 466 | 162 | 232 |
Tab. 1 Dataset sample distribution
| 背景 | 仿真 | 合成数据 | 真实数据 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 训练 | 测试 | 测试 | ||
| 83 | 1 628 | 1 466 | 162 | 232 |
| 算法 | PSNR/dB(↑) | SSIM(↑) | MAE(↓) | MSE(↓) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MS[ | 30.445 8 | 0.978 7 | 107.877 7 | 59.148 5 |
| SVD[ | 31.696 3 | 0.968 6 | 106.506 0 | 44.824 5 |
| RNMF[ | 30.085 9 | 0.989 3 | 120.939 4 | 64.820 3 |
| RPCA[ | 32.857 1 | 0.547 9 | 101.022 1 | 34.653 0 |
| CR-Net[ | 36.772 9 | 0.999 4 | 98.319 3 | 14.140 3 |
| 本文算法 | 37.114 7 | 0.999 8 | 96.101 9 | 13.111 7 |
Tab. 2 Comparison of background suppression performance of different algorithms on synthetic data
| 算法 | PSNR/dB(↑) | SSIM(↑) | MAE(↓) | MSE(↓) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MS[ | 30.445 8 | 0.978 7 | 107.877 7 | 59.148 5 |
| SVD[ | 31.696 3 | 0.968 6 | 106.506 0 | 44.824 5 |
| RNMF[ | 30.085 9 | 0.989 3 | 120.939 4 | 64.820 3 |
| RPCA[ | 32.857 1 | 0.547 9 | 101.022 1 | 34.653 0 |
| CR-Net[ | 36.772 9 | 0.999 4 | 98.319 3 | 14.140 3 |
| 本文算法 | 37.114 7 | 0.999 8 | 96.101 9 | 13.111 7 |
| 算法 | SCR | IF | 推理时间/s |
|---|---|---|---|
| MS | 1.77 | 0.32 | 0.011 |
| SVD | 2.13 | 1.00 | 0.244 |
| RNMF | 1.76 | 0.18 | 10.457 |
| RPCA | 3.81 | 2.93 | 1.340 |
| CR-Net | 6.02 | 4.18 | 0.238 |
| 本文算法 | 8.28 | 5.90 | 0.231 |
Tab. 3 Comparison of background suppression performance of different algorithms on real data
| 算法 | SCR | IF | 推理时间/s |
|---|---|---|---|
| MS | 1.77 | 0.32 | 0.011 |
| SVD | 2.13 | 1.00 | 0.244 |
| RNMF | 1.76 | 0.18 | 10.457 |
| RPCA | 3.81 | 2.93 | 1.340 |
| CR-Net | 6.02 | 4.18 | 0.238 |
| 本文算法 | 8.28 | 5.90 | 0.231 |
| 实验序号 | DE-Conv | 双流损失 | 合成数据 | 真实数据 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P1+P2+P3 | P4 | PSNR/dB(↑) | SSIM(↑) | MAE(↓) | MSE(↓) | 平均SCR/dB(↑) | 平均IF/dB(↑) | ||
| 1 | × | × | × | 36.161 9 | 0.999 4 | 109.367 0 | 16.230 3 | 1.70 | 0.58 |
| 2 | √ | √ | × | 36.644 7 | 0.999 5 | 97.018 8 | 14.614 0 | 2.33 | 0.70 |
| 3 | × | × | √ | 36.774 9 | 0.999 7 | 100.605 6 | 14.175 7 | 3.05 | 1.11 |
| 4 | √ | × | √ | 36.892 1 | 0.999 8 | 98.356 2 | 13.139 0 | 8.02 | 5.67 |
| 5 | √ | √ | √ | 37.114 7 | 0.999 8 | 96.101 9 | 13.111 7 | 8.28 | 5.90 |
Tab. 4 Ablation experiment results of DE-Conv module and dual-level loss module
| 实验序号 | DE-Conv | 双流损失 | 合成数据 | 真实数据 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P1+P2+P3 | P4 | PSNR/dB(↑) | SSIM(↑) | MAE(↓) | MSE(↓) | 平均SCR/dB(↑) | 平均IF/dB(↑) | ||
| 1 | × | × | × | 36.161 9 | 0.999 4 | 109.367 0 | 16.230 3 | 1.70 | 0.58 |
| 2 | √ | √ | × | 36.644 7 | 0.999 5 | 97.018 8 | 14.614 0 | 2.33 | 0.70 |
| 3 | × | × | √ | 36.774 9 | 0.999 7 | 100.605 6 | 14.175 7 | 3.05 | 1.11 |
| 4 | √ | × | √ | 36.892 1 | 0.999 8 | 98.356 2 | 13.139 0 | 8.02 | 5.67 |
| 5 | √ | √ | √ | 37.114 7 | 0.999 8 | 96.101 9 | 13.111 7 | 8.28 | 5.90 |
| [1] | KOOHMISHI M, KAEWUNRUEN S, CHANG L, et al. Advancing railway track health monitoring: integrating GPR, InSAR and machine learning for enhanced asset management[J]. Automation in Construction, 2024, 162: No.105378. |
| [2] | 杜翠,张千里,刘杰. 基于HCA与KAZE的铁路路基GPR图像配准算法[J]. 计算机工程, 2018, 44(3): 264-269, 274. |
| DU C, ZHANG Q L, LIU J. Railway ballast GPR image registration algorithm based on HCA and KAZE[J]. Computer Engineering, 2018, 44(3): 264-269, 274. | |
| [3] | 黄晓惠. 透水混凝土整体路面施工质量控制与检测技术研究[D]. 绵阳:西南科技大学, 2021: 47-52. |
| HUANG X H. Research on construction quality control and detection technology for pervious concrete monolithic pavement[D]. Mianyang: Southwest University of Science and Technology, 2021: 47-52. | |
| [4] | 郭云飞. 机场水泥混凝土道面脱空注浆修复评价研究[D]. 郑州:郑州大学, 2021: 46-56. |
| GUO Y F. Research on evaluation of void grouting repair for airport cement concrete pavement[D]. Zhengzhou: Zhengzhou University, 2021: 46-56. | |
| [5] | LIU K, GAO Z, CHEN F, et al. Application of airport pavement structure safety detection and intelligent recognition technology[C]// Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Traffic Transportation and Civil Architecture. Piscataway: IEEE, 2021: 143-146. |
| [6] | ZHANG Y, TONG Z, SHE X, et al. SWC-Net and multi-phase heterogeneous FDTD model for void detection underneath airport pavement slab[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2024, 25(12): 20698-20714. |
| [7] | HU Q F, ZHANG Z H, WANG F, et al. 3D GPR detection and case analysis of collapse hazards for an international airport runway[J]. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2024, 2887: No.012026. |
| [8] | LUO W, LEE Y H, JIAN X, et al. A new method for GPR clutter suppression based on stationary graph signals processing[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2025, 63: No.4500112. |
| [9] | HOU F, FANG M, LUO T X, et al. Dual-task GPR method: improved generative adversarial clutter suppression network and adaptive target localization algorithm in GPR image[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2024, 62: No.5108313. |
| [10] | TANG X S, YANG F, QIAO X, et al. A ground-penetrating radar clutter suppression algorithm integrating signal processing and image fusion[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2024, 62: No.5936618. |
| [11] | SOLIMENE R, CUCCARO A, DELL’AVERSANO A, et al. Ground clutter removal in GPR surveys[J]. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 2014, 7(3): 792-798. |
| [12] | BENEDETTO A, TOSTI F, BIANCHINI CIAMPOLI L, et al. An overview of ground-penetrating radar signal processing techniques for road inspections[J]. Signal Processing, 2017, 132: 201-209. |
| [13] | KUMLU D, ERER I. Improved clutter removal in GPR by robust nonnegative matrix factorization[J]. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 2020, 17(6): 958-962. |
| [14] | ABUJARAD F, NADIM G, OMAR A. Clutter reduction and detection of landmine objects in ground penetrating radar data using Singular Value Decomposition (SVD)[C]// Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Advanced Ground Penetrating Radar. Piscataway: IEEE, 2005: 37-42. |
| [15] | CHEN G, FU L, CHEN K, et al. Adaptive ground clutter reduction in ground-penetrating radar data based on principal component analysis[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2019, 57(6): 3271-3282. |
| [16] | SUN H H, CHENG W, FAN Z. Learning to remove clutter in real-world GPR images using hybrid data[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2022, 60: No.5113714. |
| [17] | SONG X, XIANG D, ZHOU K, et al. Improving RPCA-based clutter suppression in GPR detection of antipersonnel mines[J]. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 2017, 14(8): 1338-1342. |
| [18] | 雷文太,毛凌青,庞泽邦,等. DR-GAN:一种无监督学习的探地雷达杂波抑制方法[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2023, 45(10): 3776-3785. |
| LEI W T, MAO L Q, PANG Z B, et al. DR-GAN: an unsupervised learning approach to clutter suppression for ground penetrating radar[J]. Journal of Electronics and Information Technology, 2023, 45(10): 3776-3785. | |
| [19] | 李海丰,张凡,朴敏楠,等. 基于通道和空间注意力的机场道面地下目标自动检测[J]. 计算机应用, 2023, 43(3): 930-935. |
| LI H F, ZHANG F, PIAO M N, et al. Automatic detection of targets under airport pavement based on channel and spatial attention[J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2023, 43(3): 930-935. | |
| [20] | LI N, WU R, LI H, et al. M2FNet: multi-modal fusion network for airport runway subsurface defect detection using GPR data[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2023, 61: No.5108816. |
| [21] | NI Z K, SHI C, PAN J, et al. Declutter-GAN: GPR B-scan data clutter removal using conditional generative adversarial nets[J]. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 2022, 19: No.4023105. |
| [22] | RONNEBERGER O, FISCHER P, BROX T. U-Net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation[C]// Proceedings of the 2015 Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, LNCS 9351. Cham: Springer, 2015: 234-241. |
| [23] | PANDA S L, SAHOO U K, MAITI S, et al. An attention U-Net based improved clutter suppression in GPR images[J]. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2024, 73: No. 8502511. |
| [24] | LIU G, LAN S, ZHANG T, et al. SAGAN: skip-attention GAN for anomaly detection[C]// Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing. Piscataway: IEEE, 2021: 2468-2472. |
| [25] | WOO S, PARK J, LEE J Y, et al. CBAM: convolutional block attention module[C]// Proceedings of the 2018 European Conference on Computer Vision, LNCS 11211. Cham: Springer, 2018: 3-19. |
| [26] | YANG C, LAN S, HUANG W, et al. A Transformer-based GAN for anomaly detection[C]// Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks, LNCS 13530. Cham: Springer, 2022: 345-357. |
| [27] | PU B, LAN S, WANG W, et al. GanNeXt: a new convolutional GAN for anomaly detection[C]// Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks, LNCS 14256. Cham: Springer, 2023: 39-49. |
| [28] | CHEN Z, HE Z, LU Z M. DEA-Net: single image dehazing based on detail-enhanced convolution and content-guided attention[J]. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2024, 33: 1002-1015. |
| [1] | Haifeng LI, Fan ZHANG, Minnan PIAO, Huaichao WANG, Nansha LI, Zhongcheng GUI. Automatic detection of targets under airport pavement based on channel and spatial attention [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2023, 43(3): 930-935. |
| [2] | Haifeng LI, Bifan ZHAO, Jinyi HOU, Huaichao WANG, Zhongcheng GUI. Automatic detection algorithm for underground target based on adaptive double threshold [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2022, 42(4): 1275-1283. |
| [3] | XIAO Lei, XIONG Xiujuan, CHEN Fei, CHEN Bo. Clutter suppression method based on dynamic region regression and singular value decomposition in ultrasound flow image [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2015, 35(1): 265-269. |
| [4] | WANG Cheng-xi LIU Yi-an ZHANG Qiang. Improved least mean square adaptive filter algorithm [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2012, 32(07): 2078-2081. |
| [5] | . Optimal scheduling model for hub airport taxi based on improved ant colony collaborative algorithm [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2010, 30(4): 1000-1003. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||