Journal of Computer Applications ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (2): 620-629.DOI: 10.11772/j.issn.1001-9081.2025010030
• Frontier and comprehensive applications • Previous Articles
Xing QIU1, Zuxing XUAN2(
), Kejia HUANG3, Wen ZHANG3, Xiao ZHUANG2
Received:2025-01-10
Revised:2025-04-18
Accepted:2025-04-18
Online:2025-05-26
Published:2026-02-10
Contact:
Zuxing XUAN
About author:QIU Xing, born in 1998, M. S. candidate. His research interests include graph deep learning, hypergraph learning.Supported by:通讯作者:
玄祖兴
作者简介:邱星(1998—),男,河南唐河人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向:图深度学习、超图学习基金资助:CLC Number:
Xing QIU, Zuxing XUAN, Kejia HUANG, Wen ZHANG, Xiao ZHUANG. Hypergraph-based eaves tile dating method under data imbalance conditions[J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2026, 46(2): 620-629.
邱星, 玄祖兴, 黄可佳, 张雯, 庄晓. 基于超图的数据不平衡条件下的瓦当年代判别方法[J]. 《计算机应用》唯一官方网站, 2026, 46(2): 620-629.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.joca.cn/EN/10.11772/j.issn.1001-9081.2025010030
| 时期 | 瓦当样本数 | 时期 | 瓦当样本数 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 秦 | 128 | 北魏时期 | 28 |
| 汉 | 36 | 隋唐时期 | 117 |
| 西汉时期 | 136 | 辽 | 4 |
| 西汉中晚期 | 159 | 西夏时期 | 2 |
| 三燕时期 | 2 |
Tab. 1 Eaves tile dataset
| 时期 | 瓦当样本数 | 时期 | 瓦当样本数 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 秦 | 128 | 北魏时期 | 28 |
| 汉 | 36 | 隋唐时期 | 117 |
| 西汉时期 | 136 | 辽 | 4 |
| 西汉中晚期 | 159 | 西夏时期 | 2 |
| 三燕时期 | 2 |
| 模型 | 准确率 | 加权精确率 | 加权召回率 | 加权F1-score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ResNet[ | 73.66 | 70.69 | 73.66 | 68.19 |
| VIT[ | 89.98 | 89.36 | 89.98 | 88.97 |
| ConvNeXt[ | 87.41 | 86.86 | 87.41 | 86.85 |
| CoAtNet[ | 90.68 | 90.06 | 90.68 | 90.04 |
| EfficientViT[ | 87.88 | 87.82 | 87.88 | 85.66 |
| UniGIN[ | 84.05 | 84.83 | 84.05 | 83.83 |
| HETD-DIC | 91.36 | 92.12 | 91.36 | 91.38 |
Tab. 2 Comparison of experimental results using only eaves tile image data in low-resource scenario
| 模型 | 准确率 | 加权精确率 | 加权召回率 | 加权F1-score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ResNet[ | 73.66 | 70.69 | 73.66 | 68.19 |
| VIT[ | 89.98 | 89.36 | 89.98 | 88.97 |
| ConvNeXt[ | 87.41 | 86.86 | 87.41 | 86.85 |
| CoAtNet[ | 90.68 | 90.06 | 90.68 | 90.04 |
| EfficientViT[ | 87.88 | 87.82 | 87.88 | 85.66 |
| UniGIN[ | 84.05 | 84.83 | 84.05 | 83.83 |
| HETD-DIC | 91.36 | 92.12 | 91.36 | 91.38 |
| 模型 | 准确率 | 加权精确率 | 加权召回率 | 加权F1-score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ResNet[ | 84.55 | 79.61 | 84.55 | 80.45 |
| VIT[ | 90.24 | 89.74 | 90.24 | 89.85 |
| ConvNeXt[ | 87.80 | 88.69 | 87.80 | 87.79 |
| CoAtNet[ | 92.68 | 91.49 | 92.68 | 92.02 |
| EfficientViT[ | 90.24 | 89.38 | 90.24 | 87.99 |
| UniGIN[ | 88.35 | 86.23 | 88.35 | 86.62 |
| HETD-DIC | 91.65 | 89.54 | 91.65 | 90.09 |
Tab. 3 Comparison of experimental results based only on eaves tile image data in standard training scenario
| 模型 | 准确率 | 加权精确率 | 加权召回率 | 加权F1-score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ResNet[ | 84.55 | 79.61 | 84.55 | 80.45 |
| VIT[ | 90.24 | 89.74 | 90.24 | 89.85 |
| ConvNeXt[ | 87.80 | 88.69 | 87.80 | 87.79 |
| CoAtNet[ | 92.68 | 91.49 | 92.68 | 92.02 |
| EfficientViT[ | 90.24 | 89.38 | 90.24 | 87.99 |
| UniGIN[ | 88.35 | 86.23 | 88.35 | 86.62 |
| HETD-DIC | 91.65 | 89.54 | 91.65 | 90.09 |
| 模型 | 准确率 | 加权精确率 | 加权召回率 | 加权F1-score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HGNN[ | 87.01 | 87.08 | 87.01 | 85.87 |
| HNHN[ | 86.25 | 84.98 | 86.25 | 84.97 |
| HGNN+[ | 86.86 | 86.81 | 86.86 | 85.62 |
| HEAL[ | 74.64 | 77.26 | 74.64 | 75.29 |
| Ada-HGNN[ | 85.74 | 85.30 | 85.74 | 84.82 |
| HYDG[ | 76.99 | 79.94 | 76.99 | 77.94 |
| UniGIN[ | 90.08 | 90.35 | 90.08 | 89.50 |
| HETD-DIC | 94.75 | 94.90 | 94.75 | 94.59 |
Tab. 4 Comparison of experimental results using eaves tile dataset in low-resource scenario
| 模型 | 准确率 | 加权精确率 | 加权召回率 | 加权F1-score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HGNN[ | 87.01 | 87.08 | 87.01 | 85.87 |
| HNHN[ | 86.25 | 84.98 | 86.25 | 84.97 |
| HGNN+[ | 86.86 | 86.81 | 86.86 | 85.62 |
| HEAL[ | 74.64 | 77.26 | 74.64 | 75.29 |
| Ada-HGNN[ | 85.74 | 85.30 | 85.74 | 84.82 |
| HYDG[ | 76.99 | 79.94 | 76.99 | 77.94 |
| UniGIN[ | 90.08 | 90.35 | 90.08 | 89.50 |
| HETD-DIC | 94.75 | 94.90 | 94.75 | 94.59 |
| 模型 | 准确率 | 加权精确率 | 加权召回率 | 加权F1-score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HGNN[ | 83.64 | 81.84 | 83.64 | 82.53 |
| HNHN[ | 83.06 | 81.29 | 83.06 | 81.87 |
| HGNN+[ | 82.40 | 80.35 | 82.40 | 81.29 |
| HEAL[ | 80.58 | 82.94 | 80.58 | 80.02 |
| Ada-HGNN[ | 90.74 | 91.06 | 90.74 | 90.47 |
| HYDG[ | 86.78 | 86.43 | 86.78 | 85.99 |
| UniGIN[ | 86.45 | 85.69 | 86.45 | 85.82 |
| HETD-DIC | 96.78 | 95.68 | 96.78 | 96.12 |
Tab. 5 Comparison of experimental results using eaves tile dataset in standard training scenario
| 模型 | 准确率 | 加权精确率 | 加权召回率 | 加权F1-score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HGNN[ | 83.64 | 81.84 | 83.64 | 82.53 |
| HNHN[ | 83.06 | 81.29 | 83.06 | 81.87 |
| HGNN+[ | 82.40 | 80.35 | 82.40 | 81.29 |
| HEAL[ | 80.58 | 82.94 | 80.58 | 80.02 |
| Ada-HGNN[ | 90.74 | 91.06 | 90.74 | 90.47 |
| HYDG[ | 86.78 | 86.43 | 86.78 | 85.99 |
| UniGIN[ | 86.45 | 85.69 | 86.45 | 85.82 |
| HETD-DIC | 96.78 | 95.68 | 96.78 | 96.12 |
| 模型 | 准确率 | 加权精确率 | 加权召回率 | 加权F1-score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 模型Ⅰ | 90.08 | 90.35 | 90.08 | 89.50 |
| 模型Ⅱ | 94.64 | 94.77 | 94.64 | 94.39 |
| 模型Ⅲ | 94.28 | 94.30 | 94.28 | 94.03 |
| 模型Ⅳ | 89.88 | 89.83 | 89.88 | 89.15 |
| 模型Ⅴ | 89.47 | 89.36 | 89.47 | 88.75 |
| HETD-DIC | 94.75 | 94.90 | 94.75 | 94.59 |
Tab. 6 Ablation experimental results
| 模型 | 准确率 | 加权精确率 | 加权召回率 | 加权F1-score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 模型Ⅰ | 90.08 | 90.35 | 90.08 | 89.50 |
| 模型Ⅱ | 94.64 | 94.77 | 94.64 | 94.39 |
| 模型Ⅲ | 94.28 | 94.30 | 94.28 | 94.03 |
| 模型Ⅳ | 89.88 | 89.83 | 89.88 | 89.15 |
| 模型Ⅴ | 89.47 | 89.36 | 89.47 | 88.75 |
| HETD-DIC | 94.75 | 94.90 | 94.75 | 94.59 |
| [1] | 惠姣姣,曹红宝.基于机器学习分类算法的玻璃文物鉴定[J].现代信息科技, 2023, 7(13): 101-104. |
| HUI J J, CAO H B. Identification of glass cultural relics based on machine learning classification algorithm [J]. Modern Information Technology, 2023, 7(13): 101-104. | |
| [2] | KOONCE B. ResNet 50 [M]. Convolutional neural networks with swift for tensorflow: image recognition and dataset categorization. Berkeley: Apress, 2021: 63-75. |
| [3] | 孙选铭,苏淼.基于深度学习的丝绸文物纹样识别应用[J].丝绸, 2023, 60(8): 1-10. |
| SUN X M, SU M. Application of silk cultural relic pattern recognition based on deep learning [J]. Journal of Silk, 2023, 60(8): 1-10. | |
| [4] | 王鑫,程远,张若愚,等.基于高光谱成像技术的石质文物风化赋存环境分类方法[J].激光与光电子学进展, 2025, 62(10): No.1037005. |
| WANG X, CHENG Y, ZHANG R Y, et al. Classification of weathering environments for stone cultural heritage based on hyperspectral imaging technology [J]. Laser and Optoelectronics Progress, 2025, 62(10): No.1037005. | |
| [5] | WEI M, CHEN G, DING X, et al. Research on classification method of broken pottery in Gansu Province by GNN [C]// Proceedings of the IEEE 6th International Conference on Information Systems and Computer Aided Education. Piscataway: IEEE, 2023: 757-760. |
| [6] | AHMED Z, DAS S. A comparative analysis on recent methods for addressing imbalance classification [J]. SN Computer Science, 2023, 5(1): No.30. |
| [7] | ZHAO J, JIN J, CHEN S, et al. A weighted hybrid ensemble method for classifying imbalanced data [J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2020, 203: No.106087. |
| [8] | ZHANG J, WANG T, NG W W Y, et al. Ensembling perturbation-based oversamplers for imbalanced datasets [J]. Neurocomputing, 2022, 479: 1-11. |
| [9] | LIU J. Fuzzy support vector machine for imbalanced data with borderline noise [J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2021, 413: 64-73. |
| [10] | TAO X, LI Q, REN C, et al. Affinity and class probability-based fuzzy support vector machine for imbalanced data sets [J]. Neural Networks, 2020, 122: 289-307. |
| [11] | SALEHI A R, KHEDMATI M. A Cluster-based SMOTE Both-sampling (CSBBoost) ensemble algorithm for classifying imbalanced data [J]. Scientific Reports, 2024, 14: No.5152. |
| [12] | SINGH H, KAUR M, SINGH B. A hybrid feature weighting and selection-based strategy to classify the high-dimensional and imbalanced medical data [J]. Neural Computing and Applications, 2024, 36(20): 12299-12316. |
| [13] | 华玉冰,杨荣昌.姜女石:秦行宫遗址发掘报告(上册) [M].北京:文物出版社, 2010: 261-266. |
| HUA Y B, YANG R C. Excavation report of the Jiangnüshi site: Qin dynasty xinggong (imperial mobile palace), volume Ⅰ [M]. Beijing: Cultural Relics Press, 2010: 261-266. | |
| [14] | 华玉冰,杨荣昌.姜女石:秦行宫遗址发掘报告(下册) [M].北京:文物出版社, 2010: 10-265. |
| HUA Y B, YANG R C. Excavation report of the Jiangnüshi site: Qin dynasty xinggong (imperial mobile palace), volume Ⅱ [M]. Beijing: Cultural Relics Press, 2010: 10-265. | |
| [15] | 中国社会科学院考古研究所,日本奈良国立文化财研究所.汉长安城桂宫: 1996 — 2001年考古发掘报告[M].北京:文物出版社, 2007: 20-191. |
| Institute of Archaeology of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Nara National Research Institute for Cultural Properties. The Guigong palace in the Han capital city Chang’an: archaeological excavation report from 1996 to 2001 [M]. Beijing: Cultural Relics Press, 2007: 20-191. | |
| [16] | 中国社会科学院考古研究所.汉长安城武库:中国田野考古报告集[M].北京:文物出版社, 2005: 61-68. |
| Institute of Archaeology of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. Armory in Chang’an city of the Han period: collection of reports on field archaeology in China [M]. Beijing: Cultural Relics Press, 2005: 61-68. | |
| [17] | 中国社会科学院考古研究所.西汉礼制建筑遗址:考古学专刊[M].北京:文物出版社, 2003: 166-196. |
| Institute of Archaeology of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. Ritual architecture sites of the Western Han dynasty: archaeology special issue [M]. Beijing: Cultural Relics Press, 2003: 166-196. | |
| [18] | 中国社会科学院考古研究所.北魏洛阳永宁寺: 1979—1994年考古发掘报告[M].北京:中国大百科全书出版社, 1996: 119-121. |
| Institute of Archaeology of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. The Yongningsi temple in Northern Wei: Luoyang excavations in 1979 — 1994 [M]. Beijing: Encyclopedia of China Publishing House, 1996: 119-121. | |
| [19] | 中国社会科学院考古研究所.宁夏灵武窑发掘报告[M].北京:中国大百科全书出版社, 1995: 83-84. |
| Institute of Archaeology of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. Excavations of the Lingwu kiln-site in Ningxia [M]. Beijing: Encyclopedia of China Publishing House, 1995: 83-84. | |
| [20] | 辽宁省文物考古研究所,朝阳市北塔博物馆.朝阳北塔:考古发掘与维修工程报告[M].北京:文物出版社, 2007: 22-61. |
| Liaoning Provincial Institute of Cultural Relics and Archaeology, Chaoyang City North Pagoda Museum. Archaeological excavation and restoration project report of Chaoyang North Pagoda [M]. Beijing: Cultural Relics Press, 2007: 22-61. | |
| [21] | 中国社会科学院考古研究所.隋仁寿宫·唐九成宫:考古发掘报告[M].北京:科学出版社, 2008: 24-70. |
| Institute of Archaeology of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. Archaeological excavation report of the Renshou Palace (Sui dynasty) and Jiucheng Palace (Tang dynasty) [M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2008: 24-70. | |
| [22] | 洛阳市文物考古研究院.隋唐洛阳城天堂遗址发掘报告[M].北京:科学出版社, 2017: 90-99. |
| Luoyang Municipal Institute of Cultural Relics and Archaeology. Archaeological excavation report of the Tiantang site in the Sui-Tang imperial city of Luoyang [M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2017: 90-99. | |
| [23] | DAI Q, GAO Y. Hypergraph computation, AIFTA [M]. Singapore: Springer, 2023: 1-8. |
| [24] | LIU Z, MAO H, WU C Y, et al. A ConvNet for the 2020s [C]// Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Piscataway: IEEE, 2022: 11966-11976. |
| [25] | GAO Y, ZHANG Z, LIN H, et al. Hypergraph learning: methods and practices [J]. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2022, 44(5): 2548-2566. |
| [26] | VOMMI A M, TIRUMALA KRISHNA B T. A hybrid filter-wrapper feature selection using fuzzy KNN based on Bonferroni mean for medical datasets classification: a COVID-19 case study [J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2023, 218: No.119612. |
| [27] | HUANG J, YANG J. UniGNN: a unified framework for graph and hypergraph neural networks [C]// Proceedings of the 30th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Palo Alto: AAAI Press, 2021: 2563-2569. |
| [28] | XU K, HU W, LESKOVEC J, et al. How powerful are graph neural networks? [EB/OL]. [2024-11-13]. . |
| [29] | DUGHMI S, KALAYCI Y, YORK G. Is transductive learning equivalent to PAC learning? [C]// Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Algorithmic Learning Theory. New York: JMLR.org, 2025: 418-443. |
| [30] | DOSOVITSKIY A, BEYER L, KOLESNIKOV A, et al. An image is worth 16×16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale [EB/OL]. [2024-11-13]. . |
| [31] | DAI Z, LIU H, LE Q V, et al. CoAtNet: marrying convolution and attention for all data sizes [C]// Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. Red Hook: Curran Associates Inc., 2021: 3965-3977. |
| [32] | LIU X, PENG H, ZHENG N, et al. EfficientViT: memory efficient vision Transformer with cascaded group attention [C]// Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Piscataway: IEEE, 2023: 14420-14430. |
| [33] | FENG Y, YOU H, ZHANG Z, et al. Hypergraph neural networks [C]// Proceedings of the 33rd AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Palo Alto: AAAI Press, 2019: 3558-3565. |
| [34] | DONG Y, SAWIN W, BENGIO Y. HNHN: hypergraph networks with hyperedge neurons [EB/OL]. [2024-11-13]. . |
| [35] | GAO Y, FENG Y, JI S, et al. HGNN+: general hypergraph neural networks [J]. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2023, 45(3): 3181-3199. |
| [36] | JU W, MAO Z, YI S, et al. Hypergraph-enhanced dual semi-supervised graph classification [C]// Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Machine Learning. New York: JMLR.org, 2024: 22594-22604. |
| [37] | WANG S, ZHANG D W, HUANG J H, et al. Ada-HGNN: adaptive sampling for scalable hypergraph neural networks [EB/OL]. [2025-04-08]. . |
| [38] | MA X, ZHAO C, SHAO M, et al. Hypergraph-based dynamic graph node classification [C]// Proceedings of the 2025 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing. Piscataway: IEEE, 2025: 1-5. |
| [1] | Yanqun LU, Yiyi ZHAO. Customer churn prediction model integrating hierarchical graph neural network and specific feature learning [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2025, 45(9): 3057-3066. |
| [2] | Cong WANG, Yancui SHI. Group recommendation model by graph neural network based on multi-perspective learning [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2025, 45(4): 1205-1212. |
| [3] | Haijun GENG, Yun DONG, Zhiguo HU, Haotian CHI, Jing YANG, Xia YIN. Encrypted traffic classification method based on Attention-1DCNN-CE [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2025, 45(3): 872-882. |
| [4] | Hongyan ZHAO, Lihua GUO, Chunxia LIU, Riyun WANG. Scientific document summarization model based on multi-graph neural network and graph contrastive learning [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2025, 45(12): 3820-3828. |
| [5] | Jinghua ZHAO, Zhu ZHANG, Xiting LYU, Huidan LIN. Multiscale information diffusion prediction model based on hypergraph neural network [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2025, 45(11): 3529-3539. |
| [6] | Wenbo ZHAO, Zitong MA, Zhe YANG. Link prediction model based on directed hypergraph adaptive convolution [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2025, 45(1): 15-23. |
| [7] | Wenping ZHENG, Huilin GE, Meilin LIU, Gui YANG. Node classification algorithm fusing 2-connected motif-structure information [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2024, 44(5): 1464-1470. |
| [8] | Bin XIAO, Yun GAN, Min WANG, Xingpeng ZHANG, Zhaoxing WANG. Network abnormal traffic detection based on port attention and convolutional block attention module [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2024, 44(4): 1027-1034. |
| [9] | Li ZENG, Jingru YANG, Gang HUANG, Xiang JING, Chaoran LUO. Survey on hypergraph application methods: issues, advances, and challenges [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2024, 44(11): 3315-3326. |
| [10] | Nengqiang XIANG, Xiaofei ZHU, Zhaoze GAO. Information diffusion prediction model of prototype-aware dual-channel graph convolutional neural network [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2024, 44(10): 3260-3266. |
| [11] | Lantian XU, Ronghua LI, Yongheng DAI, Guoren WANG. Maximal clique searching algorithm for hypergraphs [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2023, 43(8): 2319-2324. |
| [12] | Weichao DANG, Bingyang CHENG, Gaimei GAO, Chunxia LIU. Contrastive hypergraph transformer for session-based recommendation [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2023, 43(12): 3683-3688. |
| [13] | Jing LIU, Zhihong DONG, Zheyu ZHANG, Zhigang SUN, Haipeng JI. Data sharing method of industrial internet of things based on federal incremental learning [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2022, 42(4): 1235-1243. |
| [14] | Xiaojie LI, Chaoran CUI, Guangle SONG, Yaxi SU, Tianze WU, Chunyun ZHANG. Stock trend prediction method based on temporal hypergraph convolutional neural network [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2022, 42(3): 797-803. |
| [15] | TIAN Ling, ZHANG Jinchuan, ZHANG Jinhao, ZHOU Wangtao, ZHOU Xue. Knowledge graph survey: representation, construction, reasoning and knowledge hypergraph theory [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2021, 41(8): 2161-2186. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||