Enhanced attack-resistible ant-based trust and reputation model

doi:10.11772/j.issn.1001-9081.2015.04.0985

Journal of Computer Applications ›› 2015, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (4): 985-990.DOI: 10.11772/j.issn.1001-9081.2015.04.0985

Previous Articles Next Articles

Enhanced attack-resistible ant-based trust and reputation model

WANG Hao^1,2, ZHANG Yuqing²

1. School of Computer, Wuhan University, Wuhan Hubei 430072, China;
2. National Computer Network Intrusion Protection Center, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 101408, China

Received:2014-12-07 Revised:2015-01-11 Online:2015-04-08 Published:2015-04-10

基于蚁群算法的加强型可抵御攻击信任管理模型

汪灏^1,2, 张玉清²

1. 武汉大学计算机学院, 武汉 430072;
2. 中国科学院大学国家计算机网络入侵防范中心, 北京 101408

通讯作者: 汪灏
作者简介:汪灏(1984-),男,湖北应城人,博士研究生,主要研究方向:信任管理、计算机系统安全; 张玉清(1966-),男,陕西宝鸡人,教授,博士,主要研究方向:手机与移动互联网安全、网络攻防与系统攻防、密码学、无线通信网络与安全。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(61272481);北京市自然科学基金资助项目(4122089)。

Abstract

Abstract:

Traditional trust and reputation models do not pay enough attention to nodes'deceit in recommendation, so their reputation evaluation may be affected by malicious nodes' collusion. A trust and reputation model named Enhanced Attack Resistible Ant-based Trust and Reputation Model (EAraTRM) was proposed, which is based on ant colony algorithm. Node recommendation behaviors analysis and adaptive mechanism to malicious nodes density were added into reputation evaluation of EAraTRM to overcome the shortage of traditional models. Simulation experiments show that EAraTRM can restrain the collusion of malicious nodes, and give more accurate reputation evaluation results, even when 90% nodes in a network are malicious and the comparison models have failed.

Key words: trust and reputation management, ant colony algorithm, anomaly detection, reputation evaluation

摘要：

通过将网络节点推荐行为分析和网络恶意节点密度的自适应机制纳入信誉度评价过程,提出了基于蚁群算法的加强型可抵御攻击信任管理模型——EAraTRM,以解决传统信任模型因较少考虑节点的推荐欺骗行为而导致容易在恶意节点的合谋攻击影响下失准的问题。在对比研究中发现,EAraTRM可以在网络中恶意节点密度达到90%,其他传统信任模型已经失效的情况下,仍保持较高的正确性。实验结果表明,EAraTRM能提高节点评价其他节点信誉度时的精度,并降低整个网络中恶意节点间进行合谋攻击的成功率。

关键词: 信任管理, 蚁群算法, 异常检测, 信誉度评估

CLC Number:

TP393.08

WANG Hao, ZHANG Yuqing. Enhanced attack-resistible ant-based trust and reputation model[J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2015, 35(4): 985-990.

汪灏, 张玉清. 基于蚁群算法的加强型可抵御攻击信任管理模型[J]. 计算机应用, 2015, 35(4): 985-990.

References

[1] JØSANG A, ISMAIL R. The beta reputation system[EB/OL].[2010-10-10].http://persons.unik.no/josang/papers/ji2002-bled.pdf.
[2] CARBONE M, NIELSEN M, SASSONE V. A formal model for trust in dynamic networks[EB/OL].[2010-10-10]. http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/262294/1/fmtSEFMoff.pdf.
[3] JØSANG A, HIRD S, FACCER E. Simulating the effect of reputation systems on e-markets[C]// Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on trust Management, LNCS 2692. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2003: 179-194.
[4] SABATER J, SIERRA C. Social ReGreT, a reputation model based on social relations[J]. ACM SIGecom Exchanges — Chains of Commitment, 2001, 3(1): 44-56.
[5] ZIEGLER C N, LAUSEN G. Spreading activation models for trust propagation[C]// Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE International Conference on e-Technology, e-Commerce and e-Service. Piscataway: IEEE Press, 2004: 83-97.
[6] MÁRMOL F G, PÉREZ G M. Providing trust in wireless sensor networks using a bio-inspired technique[J]. Telecommunication Systems, 2011, 46(2): 163-180.
[7] BEDI P, SHARMA R. Trust based recommender system using ant colony for trust computation[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2012, 39(1): 1183-1190.
[8] MÁRMOL G F, MARÍN-BLÁZQUEZ J G, PÉREZ M G. LFTM, linguistic fuzzy trust mechanism for distributed networks[J]. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 2012, 24(17): 2007-2027.
[9] WANG H, ZHANG Y. AraTRM: attack resistible ant-based trust and reputation model[C]// Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE International Conference on Computer and Information Technology. Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society, 2014: 652-657.
[10] CARCHIOLO V, LONGHEU A, MALGERI M, et al. Trust assessment: a personalized, distributed, and secure approach[J]. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 2012, 24(6): 605-617.
[11] WIERZBICKI A, KASZUBA T, NIELEK R, et al. Improving computational trust representation based on Internet auction traces[J]. Decision Support Systems, 2013, 54(2): 929-940.
[12] HOFFMAN K, ZAGE D, NITA-ROTARU C. A survey of attack and defense techniques for reputation systems[J]. ACM Computing Surveys, 2009, 42(1): Article No. 1.
[13] MÁRMOL F G, PÉREZ G M. TRMSim-WSN, trust and reputation models simulator for wireless sensor networks[C]// ICC 2009: Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE International Conference on Communications. Piscataway: IEEE Press, 2009: 1-5.

[1]	Tingwei CHEN, Jiacheng ZHANG, Junlu WANG. Random validation blockchain construction for federated learning [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2024, 44(9): 2770-2776.
[2]	Hong CHEN, Bing QI, Haibo JIN, Cong WU, Li’ang ZHANG. Class-imbalanced traffic abnormal detection based on 1D-CNN and BiGRU [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2024, 44(8): 2493-2499.
[3]	Yuhan LIU, Genlin JI, Hongping ZHANG. Video pedestrian anomaly detection method based on skeleton graph and mixed attention [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2024, 44(8): 2551-2557.
[4]	Xinrui LIN, Xiaofei WANG, Yan ZHU. Academic anomaly citation group detection based on local extended community detection [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2024, 44(6): 1855-1861.
[5]	Fan MENG, Qunli YANG, Jing HUO, Xinkuan WANG. EraseMTS： iterative active multivariable time series anomaly detection algorithm based on margin anomaly candidate set [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2024, 44(5): 1458-1463.
[6]	Zimeng ZHU, Zhixin LI, Zhan HUAN, Ying CHEN, Jiuzhen LIANG. Weakly supervised video anomaly detection based on triplet-centered guidance [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2024, 44(5): 1452-1457.
[7]	Yongjiang LIU, Bin CHEN. Pixel-level unsupervised industrial anomaly detection based on multi-scale memory bank [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2024, 44(11): 3587-3594.
[8]	Pei ZHAO, Yan QIAO, Rongyao HU, Xinyu YUAN, Minyue LI, Benchu ZHANG. Multivariate time series anomaly detection based on multi-domain feature extraction [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2024, 44(11): 3419-3426.
[9]	Hui JIANG, Qiuyan YAN, Zhujun JIANG. Symmetric positive definite autoencoder method for multivariate time series anomaly detection [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2024, 44(10): 3294-3299.
[10]	Lishuo YE, Zhixue HE. Multiscale time series anomaly detection incorporating wavelet decomposition [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2024, 44(10): 3300-3306.
[11]	Yuhao TANG, Dezhong PENG, Zhong YUAN. Fuzzy multi-granularity anomaly detection for incomplete mixed data [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2024, 44(10): 3097-3104.
[12]	Yuning ZHANG, Abudukelimu ABULIZI, Tisheng MEI, Chun XU, Maierdana MAIMAITIREYIMU, Halidanmu ABUDUKELIMU, Yutao HOU. Anomaly detection method for skeletal X-ray images based on self-supervised feature extraction [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2024, 44(1): 175-181.
[13]	Chaoshuai QI, Wensi HE, Yi JIAO, Yinghong MA, Wei CAI, Suping REN. Survey on anomaly detection algorithms for unmanned aerial vehicle flight data [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2023, 43(6): 1833-1841.
[14]	Zhe XU, Zhihong WANG, Cunyu SHAN, Yaru SUN, Ying YANG. Unsupervised face forgery video detection based on reconstruction error [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2023, 43(5): 1571-1577.
[15]	Chunyong YIN, Liwen ZHOU. Unsupervised time series anomaly detection model based on re-encoding [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2023, 43(3): 804-811.

Enhanced attack-resistible ant-based trust and reputation model

基于蚁群算法的加强型可抵御攻击信任管理模型

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics