Journal of Computer Applications ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (8): 2411-2420.DOI: 10.11772/j.issn.1001-9081.2026010044
• Artificial intelligence • Previous Articles Next Articles
Zeyu TANG, Xiaoyi WEN, Zaipeng XIE(
)
Received:2026-01-20
Revised:2026-03-19
Accepted:2026-04-02
Online:2026-04-23
Published:2026-08-10
Contact:
Zaipeng XIE
About author:TANG Zeyu, born in 2000, M. S. candidate. His research interests include neural architecture search, evolutionary computation.Supported by:通讯作者:
谢在鹏
作者简介:汤泽宇(2000—),男,江苏宿迁人,硕士研究生,CCF会员,主要研究方向:神经架构搜索、进化计算基金资助:CLC Number:
Zeyu TANG, Xiaoyi WEN, Zaipeng XIE. Diffusion-guided evolutionary neural architecture search algorithm[J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2026, 46(8): 2411-2420.
汤泽宇, 温晓易, 谢在鹏. 扩散引导的进化神经架构搜索算法[J]. 《计算机应用》唯一官方网站, 2026, 46(8): 2411-2420.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.joca.cn/EN/10.11772/j.issn.1001-9081.2026010044
| 数据集 | 算法 | 验证准确率/% | 测试准确率/% | 参数量/106 | 浮点运算量/MFLOPs | 搜索策略 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NAS-Bench-101 (CIFAR-10) | REA[ | 94.61±0.21 | 93.81±0.24 | 23.3±7.0 | 6 876.6±2 050.6 | EA |
| EG-NAS[ | 94.69±0.15 | 93.75±0.12 | 23.6±3.7 | 6 967.4±1 079.2 | EA+Gradient | |
| ITP-ENAS[ | — | 94.18±0.001 | 26.8±4.8 | 7 934.9±1 408.3 | EA+Surrogate | |
| GEA[ | 94.75±0.06 | 93.87±0.15 | 25.5±4.8 | 7 547.1±1 415.5 | EA+Proxy | |
| SPNAS[ | 94.90±0.20 | 94.16±0.10 | 28.1±4.3 | 8 302.2±1 255.1 | EA+Predictor | |
| DiNAS[ | 94.97±0.07 | 94.25±0.05 | 31.2±4.4 | 9 511.8±125.1 | Diffusion | |
| DGEA | 95.03±0.05 | 94.27±0.07 | 24.6±5.1 | 6 404.2±1 507.9 | EA+Diff+HS | |
NAS-Bench-201 (ImageNet16-120) | REA[ | 45.15±0.89 | 45.54±1.03 | 0.198±0.038 | 26.45±5.23 | EA |
| EG-NAS[ | 44.89±0.29 | 44.89±0.29 | 0.202±0.039 | 27.02±5.44 | EA+Gradient | |
| ITP-ENAS[ | 46.10±0.44 | 46.40±0.34 | 0.214±0.035 | 28.63±4.95 | EA+Surrogate | |
| GEA[ | 46.40±0.34 | 46.04±0.67 | 0.225±0.029 | 30.21±4.07 | EA+Proxy | |
| SPNAS[ | 46.42±0.32 | 46.52±0.32 | 0.217±0.035 | 29.12±4.86 | EA+Predictor | |
| DiNAS[ | 46.63±0.11 | 45.76±0.47 | 0.221±0.017 | 29.64±2.38 | Diffusion | |
| ParZC[ | — | 46.34±0.04 | 0.220±0.037 | 29.48±5.18 | Zero-shot | |
| DGEA | 46.67±0.15 | 46.23±0.36 | 0.225±0.023 | 30.13±3.16 | EA+Diff+HS |
Tab. 1 Performance evaluation and comparison on NAS-Bench-101 and NAS-Bench-201 datasets
| 数据集 | 算法 | 验证准确率/% | 测试准确率/% | 参数量/106 | 浮点运算量/MFLOPs | 搜索策略 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NAS-Bench-101 (CIFAR-10) | REA[ | 94.61±0.21 | 93.81±0.24 | 23.3±7.0 | 6 876.6±2 050.6 | EA |
| EG-NAS[ | 94.69±0.15 | 93.75±0.12 | 23.6±3.7 | 6 967.4±1 079.2 | EA+Gradient | |
| ITP-ENAS[ | — | 94.18±0.001 | 26.8±4.8 | 7 934.9±1 408.3 | EA+Surrogate | |
| GEA[ | 94.75±0.06 | 93.87±0.15 | 25.5±4.8 | 7 547.1±1 415.5 | EA+Proxy | |
| SPNAS[ | 94.90±0.20 | 94.16±0.10 | 28.1±4.3 | 8 302.2±1 255.1 | EA+Predictor | |
| DiNAS[ | 94.97±0.07 | 94.25±0.05 | 31.2±4.4 | 9 511.8±125.1 | Diffusion | |
| DGEA | 95.03±0.05 | 94.27±0.07 | 24.6±5.1 | 6 404.2±1 507.9 | EA+Diff+HS | |
NAS-Bench-201 (ImageNet16-120) | REA[ | 45.15±0.89 | 45.54±1.03 | 0.198±0.038 | 26.45±5.23 | EA |
| EG-NAS[ | 44.89±0.29 | 44.89±0.29 | 0.202±0.039 | 27.02±5.44 | EA+Gradient | |
| ITP-ENAS[ | 46.10±0.44 | 46.40±0.34 | 0.214±0.035 | 28.63±4.95 | EA+Surrogate | |
| GEA[ | 46.40±0.34 | 46.04±0.67 | 0.225±0.029 | 30.21±4.07 | EA+Proxy | |
| SPNAS[ | 46.42±0.32 | 46.52±0.32 | 0.217±0.035 | 29.12±4.86 | EA+Predictor | |
| DiNAS[ | 46.63±0.11 | 45.76±0.47 | 0.221±0.017 | 29.64±2.38 | Diffusion | |
| ParZC[ | — | 46.34±0.04 | 0.220±0.037 | 29.48±5.18 | Zero-shot | |
| DGEA | 46.67±0.15 | 46.23±0.36 | 0.225±0.023 | 30.13±3.16 | EA+Diff+HS |
| 算法 | Top-1误差/% | Top-5误差/% | 参数量/106 | 浮点运算量/GFLOPs | 搜索策略 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| REA[ | 13.97 | 3.46 | 21.2 | 6.27 | EA |
| EG-NAS[ | 14.42 | 3.58 | 22.3 | 6.57 | EA+Gradient |
| ITP-ENAS[ | 13.66 | 3.37 | 30.5 | 9.57 | EA+Surrogate |
| GEA[ | 13.83 | 3.43 | 23.1 | 6.84 | EA+Proxy |
| SPNAS[ | 13.68 | 3.38 | 31.4 | 9.27 | EA+Predictor |
| DiNAS[ | 13.50 | 3.35 | 32.4 | 9.57 | Diffusion |
| DGEA | 13.17 | 3.34 | 24.0 | 7.12 | EA+Diff+HS |
Tab. 2 Performance evaluation and comparison on ImageNet100 dataset
| 算法 | Top-1误差/% | Top-5误差/% | 参数量/106 | 浮点运算量/GFLOPs | 搜索策略 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| REA[ | 13.97 | 3.46 | 21.2 | 6.27 | EA |
| EG-NAS[ | 14.42 | 3.58 | 22.3 | 6.57 | EA+Gradient |
| ITP-ENAS[ | 13.66 | 3.37 | 30.5 | 9.57 | EA+Surrogate |
| GEA[ | 13.83 | 3.43 | 23.1 | 6.84 | EA+Proxy |
| SPNAS[ | 13.68 | 3.38 | 31.4 | 9.27 | EA+Predictor |
| DiNAS[ | 13.50 | 3.35 | 32.4 | 9.57 | Diffusion |
| DGEA | 13.17 | 3.34 | 24.0 | 7.12 | EA+Diff+HS |
| 算法 | 不同变异率的验证准确率/% | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 变异率=0.2 | 变异率=0.5 | 变异率=0.7 | |
| GA-Only | 94.61±0.24 | 94.62±0.15 | 94.54±0.26 |
| GA+HS | 94.80±0.07 | 94.77±0.08 | 94.78±0.07 |
| GA+DGM | 94.87±0.06 | 94.94±0.11 | 94.88±0.05 |
| DGEA | 95.03±0.05 | 95.02±0.06 | 95.02±0.07 |
Tab. 3 Ablation experimental results under different mutation rates on NAS-Bench-101 dataset
| 算法 | 不同变异率的验证准确率/% | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 变异率=0.2 | 变异率=0.5 | 变异率=0.7 | |
| GA-Only | 94.61±0.24 | 94.62±0.15 | 94.54±0.26 |
| GA+HS | 94.80±0.07 | 94.77±0.08 | 94.78±0.07 |
| GA+DGM | 94.87±0.06 | 94.94±0.11 | 94.88±0.05 |
| DGEA | 95.03±0.05 | 95.02±0.06 | 95.02±0.07 |
| 超参数 | 值 | Acc/% | Cost/s | CG | EC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 | 94.72±0.02 | 1 097±67 | |||
| 30 | 94.84±0.04 | 2 075±36 | |||
| 50 | 95.03±0.05 | 3436±112 | |||
| 80 | 95.03±0.08 | 5 539±82 | |||
| 100 | 94.94±0.11 | 7 001±182 | |||
| 1.00 | 94.77±0.07 | 77±4 | |||
| 1.01 | 94.98±0.08 | 59±5 | |||
| 1.02 | 95.03±0.05 | 49±3 | |||
| 1.04 | 94.93±0.07 | 61±4 | |||
| 1.06 | 94.91±0.10 | 61±4 | |||
| 1 | 95.02±0.04 | 100 | |||
| 2 | 94.99±0.07 | 50 | |||
| 4 | 95.00±0.05 | 25 | |||
| 8 | 94.86±0.12 | 12 | |||
| Adaptive | 95.03±0.05 | 51±8 |
Tab. 4 Ablation analysis of key hyperparameters in DGEA
| 超参数 | 值 | Acc/% | Cost/s | CG | EC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 | 94.72±0.02 | 1 097±67 | |||
| 30 | 94.84±0.04 | 2 075±36 | |||
| 50 | 95.03±0.05 | 3436±112 | |||
| 80 | 95.03±0.08 | 5 539±82 | |||
| 100 | 94.94±0.11 | 7 001±182 | |||
| 1.00 | 94.77±0.07 | 77±4 | |||
| 1.01 | 94.98±0.08 | 59±5 | |||
| 1.02 | 95.03±0.05 | 49±3 | |||
| 1.04 | 94.93±0.07 | 61±4 | |||
| 1.06 | 94.91±0.10 | 61±4 | |||
| 1 | 95.02±0.04 | 100 | |||
| 2 | 94.99±0.07 | 50 | |||
| 4 | 95.00±0.05 | 25 | |||
| 8 | 94.86±0.12 | 12 | |||
| Adaptive | 95.03±0.05 | 51±8 |
| 算法 | 最大准确率 | 平均准确率 | 架构有效性 |
|---|---|---|---|
| GA-Only | 94.71 | 89.41 | 94.1 |
| DGEA-Rand | 94.68 | 89.77 | 97.0 |
| DGEA | 94.81 | 90.02 | 100.0 |
| Initial | 94.71 | 89.49 | 100.0 |
Tab. 5 Structural effectiveness and accuracy analysis
| 算法 | 最大准确率 | 平均准确率 | 架构有效性 |
|---|---|---|---|
| GA-Only | 94.71 | 89.41 | 94.1 |
| DGEA-Rand | 94.68 | 89.77 | 97.0 |
| DGEA | 94.81 | 90.02 | 100.0 |
| Initial | 94.71 | 89.49 | 100.0 |
| [1] | Elsken T, Metzen J H, Hutter F. Neural architecture search: a survey[J]. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2019, 20: 1-21. |
| [2] | 孙仁科,皇甫志宇,陈虎,等. 神经架构搜索综述[J]. 计算机应用, 2024, 44(10): 2983-2994. |
| Sun Renke, Huangfu Zhiyu, Chen Hu, et al. Survey of neural architecture search[J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2024, 44(10): 2983-2994. | |
| [3] | Shao W. A survey on neural architecture search based on reinforcement learning[PP/OL]. V2. arXiv (2024-09-30) [2025-09-20].. |
| [4] | 王涵,于瑞祺,任爽. 可微神经架构搜索方法综述[J/OL]. 计算机应用 (2025-12-25) [2026-01-18].. |
| Wang Han, Yu Ruiqi, Ren Shuang. Survey on differentiable neural architecture search methods[J/OL]. Journal of Computer Applications (2025-12-25) [2026-01-18].. | |
| [5] | White C, Neiswanger W, Savani Y. BANANAS: Bayesian optimization with neural architectures for neural architecture search[J]. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2021, 35(12): 10293-10301. |
| [6] | 蒋鹏程,薛羽. 基于排序得分预测的演化神经架构搜索方法[J]. 计算机学报, 2024, 47(11): 2522-2535. |
| Jiang Pengcheng, Xue Yu. Evolutionary neural architecture search with predictor of ranking-based score[J]. Chinese Journal of Computers, 2024, 47(11): 2522-2535. | |
| [7] | Ren P, Xiao Y, Chang X, et al. A comprehensive survey of neural architecture search: challenges and solutions[J]. ACM Computing Surveys, 2022, 54(4): No.76. |
| [8] | Real E, Moore S, Selle A, et al. Large-scale evolution of image classifiers[J]. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, 2017, 70: 2902-2911. |
| [9] | Real E, Aggarwal A, Huang Y, et al. Regularized evolution for image classifier architecture search[J]. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2019, 33(1): 4780-4789. |
| [10] | Sinha N, Chen K W. Neural architecture search using progressive evolution[C]// GECCO 2022. New York: ACM, 2022: 1093-1101. |
| [11] | Lopes V, Santos M, Degardin B, et al. Guided evolutionary neural architecture search with efficient performance estimation[J]. Neurocomputing, 2024, 584: No.127509. |
| [12] | Jiang P, Xue Y, Neri F, et al. Surrogate-assisted evolutionary neural architecture search with isomorphic training and prediction[C]// ICIC 2024, LNCS 14863. Singapore: Springer, 2024: 191-203. |
| [13] | An S, Lee H, Jo J, et al. DiffusionNAG: predictor-guided neural architecture generation with diffusion models[PP/OL]. V4. arXiv (2024-03-24) [2025-09-20].. |
| [14] | Asthana R, Conrad J, Dawoud Y, et al. Multi-conditioned graph diffusion for neural architecture search[PP/OL]. V2. arXiv (2024-03-22) [2025-09-20].. |
| [15] | Ying C, Klein A, Christiansen E, et al. NAS-Bench-101: towards reproducible neural architecture search[J]. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, 2019, 97: 7105-7114. |
| [16] | Dong X, Yang Y. NAS-Bench-201: extending the scope of reproducible neural architecture search[PP/OL]. V2. arXiv (2020-01-15) [2025-09-20].. |
| [17] | Tian Y, Krishnan D, Isola P. Contrastive multiview coding[C]// ECCV 2020, LNCS 12356. Cham: Springer, 2020: 776-794. |
| [18] | Zhang T, Lei C, Zhang Z, et al. AS-NAS: adaptive scalable neural architecture search with reinforced evolutionary algorithm for deep learning[J]. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2021, 25(5): 830-841. |
| [19] | Cai Z, Chen L, Liu P, et al. EG-NAS: neural architecture search with fast evolutionary exploration[J]. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2024, 38(10): 11159-11167. |
| [20] | Chen Y, Meng G, Zhang Q, et al. RENAS: reinforced evolutionary neural architecture search[C]// CVPR 2019. Piscataway: IEEE, 2019: 4782-4791. |
| [21] | Jiang P, Xue Y, Neri F. Score predictor-assisted evolutionary neural architecture search[J]. IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computational Intelligence, 2025(Early Access): 1-15. |
| [22] | Dong P, Li L, Tang Z, et al. ParZC: parametric zero-cost proxies for efficient NAS[J]. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2025, 39(15): 16327-16335. |
| [1] | Jinglei GUO, Shiyuan LIU, Shouyong JIANG. Subregion-based many-objective evolutionary algorithm [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2026, 46(4): 1199-1210. |
| [2] | Qianlong XIONG, Jin QIN. Neural network architecture search algorithm guided by hybrid heuristic information [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2026, 46(2): 395-405. |
| [3] | Ye TIAN, Jinjin CHEN, Xingyi ZHANG. Hybrid optimizer combining evolutionary computation and gradient descent for constrained multi-objective optimization [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2024, 44(5): 1386-1392. |
| [4] | Renke SUN, Zhiyu HUANGFU, Hu CHEN, Zhongnian LI, Xinzheng XU. Survey of neural architecture search [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2024, 44(10): 2983-2994. |
| [5] | Zhihui GAO, Meng HAN, Shujuan LIU, Ang LI, Dongliang MU. Survey of high utility itemset mining methods based on intelligent optimization algorithm [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2023, 43(6): 1676-1686. |
| [6] | Zhenyu WANG, Lei ZHANG, Wenbin GAO, Weiming QUAN. Human activity recognition based on progressive neural architecture search [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2022, 42(7): 2058-2064. |
| [7] | Wei LI, Yaochi FAN, Qiaoyong JIANG, Lei WANG, Qingzheng XU. Variable convolutional autoencoder method based on teaching-learning-based optimization for medical image classification [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2022, 42(2): 592-598. |
| [8] | LIU Ran, LIU Yu, GU Jinguang. Improved AdaNet based on adaptive learning rate optimization [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2020, 40(10): 2804-2810. |
| [9] | MAO Yingchi, MU Chao, BAO Wei, LI Xiaofang. Multi-type task assignment and scheduling oriented to spatial crowdsourcing [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2018, 38(1): 6-12. |
| [10] | XU Kaibo, LU Haiyan, CHENG Biyun, HUANG Yang. Ant colony optimization algorithm based on improved pheromones double updating and local optimization for solving TSP [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2017, 37(6): 1686-1691. |
| [11] | GAO Guodong, LIN Ming, XU Lan. New PSO particle filter method based on likelihood-adjustment [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2017, 37(4): 980-985. |
| [12] | LIU Jun, FAN Hao, SUN Yu, LU Xiangyan, LIU Yan. Mesh simplification algorithm combined with edge collapse and local optimization [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2016, 36(2): 535-540. |
| [13] | LI Jie, ZHANG Zhaowei. Network security situation prediction method based on harmony search algorithm and relevance vector machine [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2016, 36(1): 199-202. |
| [14] | NI Zhiwei, FANG Qinghua, LI Rongrong, LI Yiming. Improved ant colony optimization for QoS-based Web service composition optimization [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2015, 35(8): 2238-2243. |
| [15] | LIU Le. Improved harmony search algorithm based on circular trust region [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2015, 35(4): 1049-1056. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||