直觉模糊环境下考虑有限理性特征的决策方法

doi:10.11772/j.issn.1001-9081.2017.05.1376

计算机应用 ›› 2017, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (5): 1376-1381.DOI: 10.11772/j.issn.1001-9081.2017.05.1376

直觉模糊环境下考虑有限理性特征的决策方法

邓达平, 谢小云, 郭子璇

江西理工大学应用科学学院, 江西赣州 341000

收稿日期:2016-10-28 修回日期:2016-12-11 出版日期:2017-05-10 发布日期:2017-05-16
通讯作者: 邓达平
作者简介:邓达平(1974-),男,江西抚州人,讲师,硕士,主要研究方向:智能决策、软件工程、信息安全;谢小云(1978-),男,江西赣州人,讲师,硕士,主要研究方向:嵌入式系统、信息安全;郭子璇(1996-),女,江西南昌人,主要研究方向:软件工程。
基金资助:
江西省教育厅教育改革项目（JXJG-15-36-1）。

Decision-making method with bounded rationality under intuitionistic fuzzy information environment

DENG Daping, XIE Xiaoyun, GUO Zixuan

College of Applied Science, Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, Ganzhou Jiangxi 341000, China

Received:2016-10-28 Revised:2016-12-11 Online:2017-05-10 Published:2017-05-16
Supported by:
This work is partially supported by the Education Reform Project of Jiangxi Province Education Department (JXJG-15-36-1).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对决策者具有有限理性的心理特征且属性权重和自然状态发生概率完全未知的直觉模糊多属性决策问题，提出了一种基于前景理论和证据理论的多属性决策方法。首先，利用证据理论得到各自然状态发生的概率，进而确定自然状态的决策权重函数；其次，运用正态分布概率密度函数设计直觉模糊决策参考点，并依据属性值与决策参考点之间的差异计算价值函数矩阵，从而获得前景价值矩阵；以综合前景价值最大化为准则构建最优化模型用以确定属性权重，并依据各方案的综合前景价值进行优劣排序。最后，将所提方法应用于对游戏产品的选择开发实例中。对比实验表明，运用所提方法得到的决策结果合理可靠，且更能体现决策者的原始决策信息。

关键词: 直觉模糊集, 前景理论, 证据理论, 多属性决策

Abstract: Considering the intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute decision-making problem that the decision makers with bounded rationality psychological characteristics and attribute weights and probability information of situation are completely unknown, a multi-attribute decision-making based on the prospect theory and Dempster-Shafer theory was proposed. Firstly, the probabilites of the states were calculated by Dempster-Shafer theory, and the decision-making weight functions of the states were determined. Then, the normal distribution probability density function was utilized to construct the intuitionistic fuzzy reference point. Based on the difference between the attribute value and the reference point, the value function matrix and the prospect value matrix were obtained. In addition, an optimization model was developed to derive the attribute weights with the principle of maximizing the comprehensive prospect value, and all the alternatives were further ordered. Finally, the proposed approach was applied to a numerical example about the selection of game products. The experimental results show that the decision-making results are reasonable and reliable, and the actual situation can be reflected.

Key words: intuitionistic fuzzy set, prospect theory, Dempster-Shafer theory, multi-attribute decision-making

中图分类号:

TP273.4

邓达平, 谢小云, 郭子璇. 直觉模糊环境下考虑有限理性特征的决策方法[J]. 计算机应用, 2017, 37(5): 1376-1381.

DENG Daping, XIE Xiaoyun, GUO Zixuan. Decision-making method with bounded rationality under intuitionistic fuzzy information environment[J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2017, 37(5): 1376-1381.

参考文献

[1] ZADEH L A. Fuzzy sets[J]. Information and Control, 1965, 8(3):338-356.
[2] KACPRZYK J, ORLOVSKI S A. Optimization models using fuzzy sets and possibility theory[M]//Theory and Decision Library. Berlin:Springer, 2013:33-35.
[3] 汪峰,毛军军,黄超.基于熵和协相关度的直觉模糊多属性决策方法[J].计算机应用,2015,35(12):3456-3460.(WANG F, MAO J J, HUANG C. Multi-attribute decision-making method of intuitionistic fuzziness based on entropy and co-correlation degree[J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2015, 35(12):3456-3460.)
[4] DUBOIS D J, PRADE H, YAGER R R. Readings in Fuzzy Sets for Intelligent Systems[M]. San Francisco, CA:Morgan Kaufmann, 2014:101-105.
[5] 金飞飞,倪志伟.基于犹豫模糊偏好关系的雾霾影响因素评价[J].模式识别与人工智能,2015,28(9):839-847.(JIN F F, NI Z W. Factors evaluation of fog-haze weather based on hesitant fuzzy preference relations[J]. Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, 2015, 28(9):839-847.)
[6] ATANASSOV K T. Intuitionistic fuzzy sets[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1986, 20(1):87-96.
[7] MARIA A G. A note on the connection between fuzzy numbers and random intervals[J]. Statistics & Probability Letters, 1992, 13(2):311-319.
[8] 梁燕华,郭鹏,朱煜明,等.基于区间数的多时点多属性灰靶决策模型[J].控制与决策,2012,27(10):1527-1536.(LIANG Y H, GUO P, ZHU Y M, et al. Multi-period and multi-criteria decision-making model of grey target based on interval number[J]. Control and Decision, 2012, 27(10):1527-1536.)
[9] LIU P D. A weighted aggregation operators multi-attribute group decision-making method based on interval-valued trapezoidal fuzzy numbers[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2011, 38(1):1053-1060.
[10] KUO M S, LIANG G S. A soft computing method of performance evaluation with MCDM based on interval-valued fuzzy numbers[J]. Applied Soft Computing, 2012, 12(1):476-485.
[11] XU Z S. Intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators[J]. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 2007, 15(6):1179-1187.
[12] KAHNEMAN D, TVERSKY A. Prospect theory:an analysis of decision under risk[J]. Econometrica, 1979, 47(2):263-292.
[13] 刘云志,樊治平.基于前景理论的具有指标期望的多指标决策方法[J].控制与决策,2015,30(1):91-97.(LIU Y Z, FAN Z P. Multiple attribute decision-making considering attribute aspirations:a method based on prospect theory[J]. Control and Decision, 2015, 30(1):91-97.)
[14] 王坚强, 周玲. 基于前景理论的灰色随机多准则决策方法[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2010, 30(9):1658-1664.(WANG J Q, ZHOU L. Grey-stochastic multi-criteria decision making approach based on prospect theory[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory and Practice, 2010, 30(9):1658-1664.)
[15] LIU P D, JIN F, ZHANG X, et al. Research on the multi-attribute decision-making under risk with interval probability based on prospect theory and the uncertain linguistic variables[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2011, 24(4):554-561.
[16] 高建伟,刘慧晖,谷云东.基于前景理论的区间直觉模糊多准则决策方法[J].系统工程理论与实践, 2014, 34(12):3175-3181.(GAO J W, LIU H H, GU Y D. Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making method based on prospect theory[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2014, 34(12):3175-3181.)
[17] 郝晶晶,朱建军,刘思峰.基于前景理论的多阶段随机多准则决策方法[J].中国管理科学, 2015, 23(1):73-81.(HAO J J, ZHU J J, LIU S F. A method for multi-stage stochastic multi-criteria decision making concerning prospect theory[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2015, 23(1):73-81.)
[18] 闫书丽,刘思峰,吴利丰.一种基于前景理论的三参数区间灰数型群体灰靶决策方法[J]. 控制与决策, 2015, 30(1):105-109.(YAN S L, LIU S F, WU L F. A group grey target decision making method with three parameter interval grey number based on prospect theory[J]. Control and Decision, 2015, 30(1):105-109.)
[19] 王玮,叶强,谢春思,等.基于前景理论的编队作战决心方案优选研究[J].系统工程与电子技术, 2015, 37(2):331-335.(WANG W, YE Q, XIE C S, et al. Research on method of operational plan optimization for the warship formation based on prospect theory[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2015, 37(2):331-335.)
[20] 王肖霞,杨风暴,史冬梅.基于前景理论的尾矿坝风险评估[J].安全与环境工程, 2015, 22(3):122-125.(WANG X X, YANG F B, SHI D M. Research on the model of tailing dam risk evaluation based on the prospect theory[J]. Safety and Environmental Engineering, 2015, 22(3):122-125.)
[21] 马庆功.基于前景理论的犹豫模糊多属性群决策方法[J].计算机工程与应用,2015,51(24):249-253.(MA Q G. Hesitant fuzzy multi-attribute group decision-making method based on prospect theory[J]. Computer Engineering and Applications, 2015, 51(24):249-253.)
[22] ZADHE L A. A simple view of the Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence and its implication for the rule of combination[J]. AI Magazine, 1986, 7(2):85-90.)
[23] SMETS P, KENNES R. The transferable belief model[J]. Artificial Intelligence, 1994, 66(2):191-234.

直觉模糊环境下考虑有限理性特征的决策方法

Decision-making method with bounded rationality under intuitionistic fuzzy information environment

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	张林发, 张榆锋, 王琨, 李支尧. 基于直觉模糊集和亮度增强的医学图像融合[J]. 计算机应用, 2021, 41(7): 2082-2091.
[2]	杨磊, 赵红东. 基于轻量级深度神经网络的环境声音识别[J]. 计算机应用, 2020, 40(11): 3172-3177.
[3]	李旭峰, 宋亚飞, 李晓楠. 考虑决策者时序偏好的时域证据融合方法[J]. 计算机应用, 2019, 39(6): 1626-1631.
[4]	彭定洪, 杨扬. 基于毕达哥拉斯模糊Frank算子的多属性决策方法[J]. 计算机应用, 2019, 39(2): 316-322.
[5]	张利, 孙军, 李大伟, 牛明航, 高一丹. 基于融合型深度学习的滚动轴承亚健康识别算法[J]. 计算机应用, 2018, 38(8): 2224-2229.
[6]	戴翠琴, 王文翰. 基于主客观赋权的多属性空间节点选择算法[J]. 计算机应用, 2018, 38(4): 1089-1094.
[7]	王莎莎, 冯子亮, 傅可人. 基于图节点中心性和空间自相关的显著性检测方法[J]. 计算机应用, 2018, 38(12): 3547-3556.
[8]	王剑, 张志勇, 乔阔远. 降低相似度碰撞的证据融合方法[J]. 计算机应用, 2018, 38(10): 2794-2800.
[9]	熊宁欣, 王应明. 基于改进模糊熵和证据推理的多属性决策方法[J]. 计算机应用, 2018, 38(10): 2801-2806.
[10]	邰滢滢, 庞影, 段苛苛, 付云鹏. 基于改进权重的D-S证据理论的动态负载平衡算法[J]. 计算机应用, 2018, 38(10): 2976-2981.
[11]	胡鑫, 常文军, 孙超平. 基于比较可能度的多属性决策方法[J]. 计算机应用, 2017, 37(8): 2223-2228.
[12]	王续乔, 王瑾琨. 基于D-S证据理论的室内组合定位算法[J]. 计算机应用, 2017, 37(4): 1198-1201.
[13]	朱轮. 基于后悔理论和证据理论的犹豫模糊决策方法[J]. 计算机应用, 2017, 37(2): 540-545.
[14]	王翠翠, 姚登宝, 李宝萍. 基于熵和风险态度的二型模糊多属性决策方法[J]. 计算机应用, 2016, 36(9): 2535-2539.
[15]	高明霞, 陈福荣. 基于信息融合的中文微博可信度评估方法[J]. 计算机应用, 2016, 36(8): 2071-2075.