Journal of Computer Applications ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (3): 723-731.DOI: 10.11772/j.issn.1001-9081.2025040454
• Artificial intelligence • Previous Articles Next Articles
Dingjia WU1,2, Zhe CUI1(
)
Received:2025-04-25
Revised:2025-06-11
Accepted:2025-06-12
Online:2025-06-23
Published:2026-03-10
Contact:
Zhe CUI
About author:WU Dingjia, born in 1999, M. S. candidate. His research interests include natural language processing, large language models.
Supported by:通讯作者:
崔喆
作者简介:吴定佳(1999—),男,四川巴中人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向:自然语言处理、大语言模型
基金资助:CLC Number:
Dingjia WU, Zhe CUI. MG-SQL: SQL generation framework with enhanced schema linking and multi-generator collaboration[J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2026, 46(3): 723-731.
吴定佳, 崔喆. 增强模式链接与多生成器协同的SQL生成框架MG-SQL[J]. 《计算机应用》唯一官方网站, 2026, 46(3): 723-731.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.joca.cn/EN/10.11772/j.issn.1001-9081.2025040454
| 方法 | 模型 | 有效效率得分 | 执行准确率/% | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 简单 | 中等 | 困难 | 整体 | |||
| XiYan-SQL | 微调模型 | — | — | — | — | 73.34 |
| GPT-4 | GPT-4 | — | — | — | — | 46.35 |
| DIN-SQL | GPT-4 | 58.79 | — | — | — | 50.72 |
| DAIL-SQL | GPT-4 | 56.08 | — | — | — | 54.76 |
| TA-SQL | GPT-4 | — | 63.14 | 48.60 | 36.11 | 56.19 |
| MAC-SQL | GPT-4 | 66.39 | 65.73 | 52.69 | 40.28 | 59.39 |
| ROUTE | Qwen2.5-14B | 65.20 | — | — | — | 60.90 |
| MCS-SQL | GPT-4 | 64.80 | 70.40 | 53.10 | 51.40 | 63.36 |
| CHESS | Proprietary | — | — | — | — | 65.00 |
| E-SQL | GPT-4o | — | — | — | — | 65.58 |
| LPE-SQL | Llama-3.1-70B | — | 72.11 | 59.70 | 51.03 | 66.36 |
| RSL-SQL | GPT-4o | 70.32 | 74.38 | 57.11 | 53.79 | 67.21 |
| Distillery | GPT-4o | — | — | — | — | 67.21 |
| OpenSearch-SQL | GPT-4o | — | — | — | — | 69.30 |
| E-SQL | GPT-4o-mini | — | 68.00 | 53.23 | 47.59 | 61.60 |
| MG-SQL | GPT-4o-mini | 79.59 | 76.00 | 60.78 | 57.93 | 69.69 |
Tab. 1 Comparison of execution accuracy and valid efficiency score on BIRD development set of different methods and models
| 方法 | 模型 | 有效效率得分 | 执行准确率/% | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 简单 | 中等 | 困难 | 整体 | |||
| XiYan-SQL | 微调模型 | — | — | — | — | 73.34 |
| GPT-4 | GPT-4 | — | — | — | — | 46.35 |
| DIN-SQL | GPT-4 | 58.79 | — | — | — | 50.72 |
| DAIL-SQL | GPT-4 | 56.08 | — | — | — | 54.76 |
| TA-SQL | GPT-4 | — | 63.14 | 48.60 | 36.11 | 56.19 |
| MAC-SQL | GPT-4 | 66.39 | 65.73 | 52.69 | 40.28 | 59.39 |
| ROUTE | Qwen2.5-14B | 65.20 | — | — | — | 60.90 |
| MCS-SQL | GPT-4 | 64.80 | 70.40 | 53.10 | 51.40 | 63.36 |
| CHESS | Proprietary | — | — | — | — | 65.00 |
| E-SQL | GPT-4o | — | — | — | — | 65.58 |
| LPE-SQL | Llama-3.1-70B | — | 72.11 | 59.70 | 51.03 | 66.36 |
| RSL-SQL | GPT-4o | 70.32 | 74.38 | 57.11 | 53.79 | 67.21 |
| Distillery | GPT-4o | — | — | — | — | 67.21 |
| OpenSearch-SQL | GPT-4o | — | — | — | — | 69.30 |
| E-SQL | GPT-4o-mini | — | 68.00 | 53.23 | 47.59 | 61.60 |
| MG-SQL | GPT-4o-mini | 79.59 | 76.00 | 60.78 | 57.93 | 69.69 |
| 方法 | 候选生成 | 选择策略 | EX/% |
|---|---|---|---|
| XiYan-SQL | ICL+微调 | 微调模型 | 73.34 |
| XiYan-SQL(w/o 微调生成) | ICL | 微调模型 | 68.67 |
| XiYan-SQL(w/o 选择模型) | ICL+微调 | — | 68.84 |
| CHESS(Proprietary) | ICL | 投票 | 65.00 |
| CHESS(Gemini-1.5-pro) | ICL | 单元测试 | 68.31 |
| OpenSearch-SQL | ICL | 投票 | 69.30 |
| MG-SQL | ICL | 投票 | 69.69 |
Tab. 2 Comparison of execution accuracy among methods using different candidate generation
| 方法 | 候选生成 | 选择策略 | EX/% |
|---|---|---|---|
| XiYan-SQL | ICL+微调 | 微调模型 | 73.34 |
| XiYan-SQL(w/o 微调生成) | ICL | 微调模型 | 68.67 |
| XiYan-SQL(w/o 选择模型) | ICL+微调 | — | 68.84 |
| CHESS(Proprietary) | ICL | 投票 | 65.00 |
| CHESS(Gemini-1.5-pro) | ICL | 单元测试 | 68.31 |
| OpenSearch-SQL | ICL | 投票 | 69.30 |
| MG-SQL | ICL | 投票 | 69.69 |
| 方法 | NSR/% | SRR/% | 平均表数 | 平均列数 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Full Schema | 100.00 | 100.00 | 7.44 | 76.28 |
| Gold-Based | 100.00 | 100.00 | 1.94 | 4.50 |
| MCS-SQL | — | 89.80 | — | — |
| CHESS | 94.00 | 89.70 | 1.92 | 4.47 |
| RSL-SQL | 98.27 | 92.52 | 5.71 | 18.86 |
| MG-SQL | 99.68 | 98.89 | 7.08 | 42.02 |
Tab. 3 Comparison of schema linking results of different methods on BIRD development set
| 方法 | NSR/% | SRR/% | 平均表数 | 平均列数 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Full Schema | 100.00 | 100.00 | 7.44 | 76.28 |
| Gold-Based | 100.00 | 100.00 | 1.94 | 4.50 |
| MCS-SQL | — | 89.80 | — | — |
| CHESS | 94.00 | 89.70 | 1.92 | 4.47 |
| RSL-SQL | 98.27 | 92.52 | 5.71 | 18.86 |
| MG-SQL | 99.68 | 98.89 | 7.08 | 42.02 |
| 设置 | 执行准确率 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 简单 | 中等 | 困难 | 整体 | |
| 多生成器 | 76.00 | 60.78 | 57.93 | 69.69 |
| w/o 经验生成器 | 74.59 | 58.41 | 53.10 | 67.67 |
| w/o 思维链生成器 | 74.27 | 60.13 | 54.48 | 68.12 |
| w/o 查询计划生成器 | 74.92 | 61.42 | 54.48 | 68.90 |
| w/o 渐进生成器 | 75.68 | 60.78 | 53.79 | 69.10 |
Tab. 4 Ablation experimental results of multiple generators on BIRD development set
| 设置 | 执行准确率 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 简单 | 中等 | 困难 | 整体 | |
| 多生成器 | 76.00 | 60.78 | 57.93 | 69.69 |
| w/o 经验生成器 | 74.59 | 58.41 | 53.10 | 67.67 |
| w/o 思维链生成器 | 74.27 | 60.13 | 54.48 | 68.12 |
| w/o 查询计划生成器 | 74.92 | 61.42 | 54.48 | 68.90 |
| w/o 渐进生成器 | 75.68 | 60.78 | 53.79 | 69.10 |
| 设置 | 执行准确率 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 简单 | 中等 | 困难 | 整体 | |
| 多生成器 | 76.00 | 60.78 | 57.93 | 69.69 |
| 经验生成器 | 71.24 | 57.11 | 51.72 | 65.12 |
| 思维链生成器 | 69.84 | 54.53 | 46.21 | 62.97 |
| 查询计划生成器 | 72.11 | 56.03 | 51.03 | 65.25 |
| 渐进生成器 | 68.00 | 50.22 | 51.72 | 61.08 |
Tab. 5 Comparison of execution accuracy of different generators unit:%
| 设置 | 执行准确率 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 简单 | 中等 | 困难 | 整体 | |
| 多生成器 | 76.00 | 60.78 | 57.93 | 69.69 |
| 经验生成器 | 71.24 | 57.11 | 51.72 | 65.12 |
| 思维链生成器 | 69.84 | 54.53 | 46.21 | 62.97 |
| 查询计划生成器 | 72.11 | 56.03 | 51.03 | 65.25 |
| 渐进生成器 | 68.00 | 50.22 | 51.72 | 61.08 |
| 案例 | 难度 | 正确案例 | PREDICTED_SQL | GOLD_SQL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 简单 | Question: What is the ratio of customers who pay in EUR against customers who pay in CZK? | SELECT COUNT(CASE WHEN Currency = 'EUR' THEN 1 END) * 1.0 / COUNT(CASE WHEN Currency = 'CZK' THEN 1 END) AS ratio FROM customers | SELECT CAST(SUM(IIF(Currency = 'EUR', 1, 0)) AS FLOAT) / SUM (IIF(Currency = 'CZK', 1, 0)) AS ratio FROM customers |
Evidence: ratio of customers who pay in EUR against customers who pay in CZK = count(Currency = 'EUR') / count (Currency = 'CZK'). | ||||
| 2 | 中等 | Question: For the year that concluded on December 31, 1998, how many male patients on average were tested in the lab each month? | SELECT CAST(COUNT(Laboratory.ID) AS REAL) / 12 FROM Laboratory INNER JOIN Patient ON Laboratory.ID = Patient.ID WHERE Laboratory.Date BETWEEN '1998-01-01' AND '1998-12-31' AND Patient.SEX = 'M' | SELECT CAST(COUNT(T1.ID) AS REAL) / 12 FROM Patient AS T1 INNER JOIN Laboratory AS T2 ON T1.ID = T2.ID WHERE STRFTIME('%Y', T2.Date) = '1998' AND T1.SEX = 'M' |
Evidence: the year that concluded on December 31, 1998 refers to Date BETWEEN '1998-01-01' AND '1998-12-31'; male refers to SEX = 'M'; calculation = DIVIDE(COUNT(ID), 12) | ||||
| 3 | 困难 | Question: Please list the patient's ID if he or she has an abnormal level of red blood cell and is followed at the outpatient clinic. | SELECT P.ID FROM Patient P JOIN Laboratory L ON P.ID = L.ID WHERE (L.RBC <= 3.5 OR L.RBC >= 6.0) AND P.Admission = '-' | SELECT DISTINCT T1.ID FROM Patient AS T1 INNER JOIN Laboratory AS T2 ON T1.ID = T2.ID WHERE (T2.RBC <= 3.5 OR T2.RBC >= 6) AND T1.Admission = '-' |
Evidence: RBC < = 3.5 or RBC > = 6.0 means the patient has an abnormal level of red blood cell; 3.5 < RBC < 6.0 means the patient has a normal level of red blood cell; followed at the outpatient clinic refers to Admission = '-' |
Tab. 6 Comparison of generated SQLs on BIRD development set
| 案例 | 难度 | 正确案例 | PREDICTED_SQL | GOLD_SQL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 简单 | Question: What is the ratio of customers who pay in EUR against customers who pay in CZK? | SELECT COUNT(CASE WHEN Currency = 'EUR' THEN 1 END) * 1.0 / COUNT(CASE WHEN Currency = 'CZK' THEN 1 END) AS ratio FROM customers | SELECT CAST(SUM(IIF(Currency = 'EUR', 1, 0)) AS FLOAT) / SUM (IIF(Currency = 'CZK', 1, 0)) AS ratio FROM customers |
Evidence: ratio of customers who pay in EUR against customers who pay in CZK = count(Currency = 'EUR') / count (Currency = 'CZK'). | ||||
| 2 | 中等 | Question: For the year that concluded on December 31, 1998, how many male patients on average were tested in the lab each month? | SELECT CAST(COUNT(Laboratory.ID) AS REAL) / 12 FROM Laboratory INNER JOIN Patient ON Laboratory.ID = Patient.ID WHERE Laboratory.Date BETWEEN '1998-01-01' AND '1998-12-31' AND Patient.SEX = 'M' | SELECT CAST(COUNT(T1.ID) AS REAL) / 12 FROM Patient AS T1 INNER JOIN Laboratory AS T2 ON T1.ID = T2.ID WHERE STRFTIME('%Y', T2.Date) = '1998' AND T1.SEX = 'M' |
Evidence: the year that concluded on December 31, 1998 refers to Date BETWEEN '1998-01-01' AND '1998-12-31'; male refers to SEX = 'M'; calculation = DIVIDE(COUNT(ID), 12) | ||||
| 3 | 困难 | Question: Please list the patient's ID if he or she has an abnormal level of red blood cell and is followed at the outpatient clinic. | SELECT P.ID FROM Patient P JOIN Laboratory L ON P.ID = L.ID WHERE (L.RBC <= 3.5 OR L.RBC >= 6.0) AND P.Admission = '-' | SELECT DISTINCT T1.ID FROM Patient AS T1 INNER JOIN Laboratory AS T2 ON T1.ID = T2.ID WHERE (T2.RBC <= 3.5 OR T2.RBC >= 6) AND T1.Admission = '-' |
Evidence: RBC < = 3.5 or RBC > = 6.0 means the patient has an abnormal level of red blood cell; 3.5 < RBC < 6.0 means the patient has a normal level of red blood cell; followed at the outpatient clinic refers to Admission = '-' |
| 问题ID | 问题简述 | 错误类型 | 错误SQL(核心片段) | 正确SQL(核心片段) | 错误分析 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 查询Fresno教育局下所有特许学校的邮编 | C1 | SELECT DISTINCT schools.MailZip … | SELECT T2.Zip … (T2为schools别名) | 选择了MailZip而非Zip列 |
| 16 | 查询Alameda合并学校中测试人数少于100的学校数量 | C3 | 未包含StatusType = 'Merged'条件 | … WHERE T1.StatusType = 'Merged' … | 关键过滤条件缺失 |
| 30 | 查询K-12入学人数最少的5个城市 | C4 | … ORDER BY f.'Enrollment (K-12)' ASC | … GROUP BY T2.City ORDER BY SUM(T1.'Enrollment (K-12)') ASC | 缺少按城市分组及对入学人数求和 |
| 24 | 查询符合条件的学校名称,条件含餐食比例计算 | C5 | (frpm.'Free Meal Count (K-12)' / frpm.'Enrollment (K-12)') >= 0.1 | CAST(T2.'Free Meal Count (K-12)' AS REAL) / T2.'Enrollment (K-12)' > 0.1 | 缺少类型转换导致整数除法,比较符错误 |
| 193 | 查询氯元素参与的化学键类型 | C2 | … atom AS T1 INNER JOIN bond AS T2 ON T1.molecule_id = T2.molecule_id … | … bond AS T1 INNER JOIN connected AS T2 ON T1.bond_id = T2.bond_id INNER JOIN atom AS T3 ON T2.atom_id = T3.atom_id … | 缺少了连接原子和化学键的关键表connected |
| 349 | 查询在第一轮资格赛中被淘汰的5名车手 | C6 | … ORDER BY Q.q1 LIMIT 5 (最快5名) | … ORDER BY T1.q1 DESC LIMIT 5 (最慢5名) | 错误理解“淘汰”的含义(应为时间最慢) |
| 28 | 查询本地资助学校K-12与5~17岁入学人数平均差额 | C7 | 子查询:… FROM frpm WHERE frpm.'Charter Funding Type' = 'Locally funded' | 子查询:… FROM frpm AS T3 INNER JOIN schools AS T4 ON T3.CDSCode = T4.CDSCode WHERE T4.FundingType = 'Locally funded' | 子查询未正确连接schools表来按FundingType过滤,错误使用了frpm表的字段 |
Tab. 7 Analysis of incorrectly generated SQLs on BIRD development set
| 问题ID | 问题简述 | 错误类型 | 错误SQL(核心片段) | 正确SQL(核心片段) | 错误分析 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 查询Fresno教育局下所有特许学校的邮编 | C1 | SELECT DISTINCT schools.MailZip … | SELECT T2.Zip … (T2为schools别名) | 选择了MailZip而非Zip列 |
| 16 | 查询Alameda合并学校中测试人数少于100的学校数量 | C3 | 未包含StatusType = 'Merged'条件 | … WHERE T1.StatusType = 'Merged' … | 关键过滤条件缺失 |
| 30 | 查询K-12入学人数最少的5个城市 | C4 | … ORDER BY f.'Enrollment (K-12)' ASC | … GROUP BY T2.City ORDER BY SUM(T1.'Enrollment (K-12)') ASC | 缺少按城市分组及对入学人数求和 |
| 24 | 查询符合条件的学校名称,条件含餐食比例计算 | C5 | (frpm.'Free Meal Count (K-12)' / frpm.'Enrollment (K-12)') >= 0.1 | CAST(T2.'Free Meal Count (K-12)' AS REAL) / T2.'Enrollment (K-12)' > 0.1 | 缺少类型转换导致整数除法,比较符错误 |
| 193 | 查询氯元素参与的化学键类型 | C2 | … atom AS T1 INNER JOIN bond AS T2 ON T1.molecule_id = T2.molecule_id … | … bond AS T1 INNER JOIN connected AS T2 ON T1.bond_id = T2.bond_id INNER JOIN atom AS T3 ON T2.atom_id = T3.atom_id … | 缺少了连接原子和化学键的关键表connected |
| 349 | 查询在第一轮资格赛中被淘汰的5名车手 | C6 | … ORDER BY Q.q1 LIMIT 5 (最快5名) | … ORDER BY T1.q1 DESC LIMIT 5 (最慢5名) | 错误理解“淘汰”的含义(应为时间最慢) |
| 28 | 查询本地资助学校K-12与5~17岁入学人数平均差额 | C7 | 子查询:… FROM frpm WHERE frpm.'Charter Funding Type' = 'Locally funded' | 子查询:… FROM frpm AS T3 INNER JOIN schools AS T4 ON T3.CDSCode = T4.CDSCode WHERE T4.FundingType = 'Locally funded' | 子查询未正确连接schools表来按FundingType过滤,错误使用了frpm表的字段 |
| [1] | CHEN W. Large language models are few(1)-shot table reasoners[C]// Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EACL 2023. Stroudsburg: ACL, 2023: 1120-1130. |
| [2] | MOHAMMADJAFARI A, MAIDA A S, GOTTUMUKKALA R. From natural language to SQL: review of LLM-based text-to-SQL systems[EB/OL]. [2024-12-10].. |
| [3] | POURREZA M, RAFIEI D. DIN-SQL: decomposed in-context learning of text-to-SQL with self-correction [C]// Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. Red Hook: Curran Associates Inc., 2023: 36339-36348. |
| [4] | GAO D, WANG H, LI Y, et al. Text-to-SQL empowered by large language models: a benchmark evaluation [J]. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, 2024, 17(5): 1132-1145. |
| [5] | WANG B, REN C, YANG J, et al. MAC-SQL: a multi-agent collaborative framework for Text-to-SQL [C]// Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Computational Linguistics. Stroudsburg: ACL, 2025: 540-557. |
| [6] | WEI J, WANG X, SCHUURMANS D, et al. Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models [C]// Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. Red Hook: Curran Associates Inc., 2022: 24824-24837. |
| [7] | LI Z, WANG X, ZHAO J, et al. PET-SQL: a prompt-enhanced two-round refinement of Text-to-SQL with cross-consistency [EB/OL]. [2024-12-19].. |
| [8] | CHU Z, WANG Z, QIN Q. Leveraging prior experience: an expandable auxiliary knowledge base for text-to-SQL [EB/OL]. [2024-12-23].. |
| [9] | QU G, LI J, LI B, et al. Before generation, align it! a novel and effective strategy for mitigating hallucinations in text-to-SQL generation [C]// Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2024. Stroudsburg: ACL, 2024: 5456-5471. |
| [10] | TALAEI S, POURREZA M, CHANG Y C, et al. CHESS: contextual harnessing for efficient SQL synthesis [EB/OL]. [2025-01-06].. |
| [11] | CAO Z, ZHENG Y, FAN Z, et al. RSL-SQL: robust schema linking in Text-to-SQL generation [EB/OL]. [2024-12-27].. |
| [12] | POURREZA M, LI H, SUN R, et al. CHASE-SQL: multi-path reasoning and preference optimized candidate selection in Text-to-SQL [EB/OL]. [2025-01-03].. |
| [13] | ZHANG H, CAO R, CHEN L, et al. ACT-SQL: in-context learning for text-to-SQL with automatically-generated chain-of-thought [C]// Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023. Stroudsburg: ACL, 2023: 3501-3532. |
| [14] | WANG L, QIN B, HUI B, et al. Proton: probing schema linking information from pre-trained language models for text-to-SQL parsing [C]// Proceedings of the 28th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. New York: ACM, 2022: 1889-1898. |
| [15] | LEE D, PARK C, KIM J, et al. MCS-SQL: leveraging multiple prompts and multiple-choice selection for text-to-SQL generation[C]// Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Computational Linguistics. Stroudsburg: ACL, 2025: 337-353. |
| [16] | GAO Y, LIU Y, LI X, et al. A preview of XiYan-SQL: a multi-generator ensemble framework for text-to-SQL [EB/OL]. [2024-12-20].. |
| [17] | XIE X, XU G, ZHAO L, et al. OpenSearch-SQL: enhancing Text-to-SQL with dynamic few-shot and consistency alignment [EB/OL]. [2025-02-25].. |
| [18] | GAN Y, CHEN X, PURVER M. Re-appraising the schema linking for text-to-SQL [C]// Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2023. Stroudsburg: ACL, 2023: 835-852. |
| [19] | LIU A, HU X, WEN L, et al. A comprehensive evaluation of ChatGPT’s zero-shot Text-to-SQL capability [EB/OL]. [2025-02-09].. |
| [20] | JI Z, LEE N, FRIESKE R, et al. Survey of hallucination in natural language generation [J]. ACM Computing Surveys, 2023, 55(12): No.248. |
| [21] | LI J, HUI B, QU G, et al. Can LLM already serve as a database interface? a big bench for large-scale database grounded text-to-SQLs [C]// Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. Red Hook: Curran Associates Inc., 2023: 42330-42357. |
| [22] | CAFEROĞLU H A, ULUSOY Ö. E-SQL: direct schema linking via question enrichment in Text-to-SQL [EB/OL]. [2025-01-07].. |
| [23] | QIN Y, CHEN C, FU Z, et al. ROUTE: robust multitask tuning and collaboration for Text-to-SQL [EB/OL]. [2024-12-17].. |
| [24] | MAAMARI K, ABUBAKER F, JAROSLAWICZ D, et al. The death of schema linking? Text-to-SQL in the age of well-reasoned language models [EB/OL]. [2025-01-06].. |
| [1] | Rilong WANG, Zhenping LI, Xiaosong LI, Qiang GAO, Ya HE, Yong ZHONG, Yingxiao ZHAO. Multi-Agent collaborative knowledge reasoning framework [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2026, 46(3): 708-714. |
| [2] | Haoyang ZHANG, Liping ZHANG, Sheng YAN, Na LI, Xuefei ZHANG. Review of large language model methods for knowledge graph completion [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2026, 46(3): 683-695. |
| [3] | Enkang XI, Jing FAN, Yadong JIN, Hua DONG, Hao YU, Yihang SUN. Review of threats faced by federated learning in privacy and security field [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2026, 46(3): 798-808. |
| [4] | Yiming HUANG, Xihua ZOU, Guo DENG, Di ZHENG. Pre-answering and retrieval filtering: dual-stage optimization method for RAG-based question-answering systems [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2026, 46(3): 696-707. |
| [5] | Bin SHEN, Xiaoning CHEN, Hua CHENG, Yiquan FANG, Huifeng WANG. Intelligent undergraduate teaching evaluation system based on large language models [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2026, 46(3): 993-1003. |
| [6] | Fei GAO, Dong CHEN, Dixing BIAN, Wenqiang FAN, Qidong LIU, Pei LYU, Chaoyang ZHANG, Mingliang XU. Multistage coupled decision-making framework for researcher redeployment after discipline revocation [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2026, 46(2): 416-426. |
| [7] | Yixin LIU, Xianggen LIU, Wen LIU, Hongbo DENG, Ziye ZHANG, Hua MU. Benchmark dataset for retrieval-augmented generation on long documents [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2026, 46(2): 386-394. |
| [8] | Yi LIN, Bing XIA, Yong WANG, Shunda MENG, Juchong LIU, Shuqin ZHANG. AI-Agent based method for hidden RESTful API discovery and vulnerability detection [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2026, 46(1): 135-143. |
| [9] | Xinran XIE, Zhe CUI, Rui CHEN, Tailai PENG, Dekun LIN. Zero-shot re-ranking method by large language model with hierarchical filtering and label semantic extension [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2026, 46(1): 60-68. |
| [10] | Binbin ZHANG, Yongbin QIN, Ruizhang HUANG, Yanping CHEN. Judgment document summarization method combining large language model and dynamic prompts [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2025, 45(9): 2783-2789. |
| [11] | Tao FENG, Chen LIU. Dual-stage prompt tuning method for automated preference alignment [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2025, 45(8): 2442-2447. |
| [12] | Yiheng SUN, Maofu LIU. Tender information extraction method based on prompt tuning of knowledge [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2025, 45(4): 1169-1176. |
| [13] | Jing HE, Yang SHEN, Runfeng XIE. Recognition and optimization of hallucination phenomena in large language models [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2025, 45(3): 709-714. |
| [14] | Xuefei ZHANG, Liping ZHANG, Sheng YAN, Min HOU, Yubo ZHAO. Personalized learning recommendation in collaboration of knowledge graph and large language model [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2025, 45(3): 773-784. |
| [15] | Chenwei SUN, Junli HOU, Xianggen LIU, Jiancheng LYU. Large language model prompt generation method for engineering drawing understanding [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2025, 45(3): 801-807. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||