Journal of Computer Applications ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (7): 2297-2306.DOI: 10.11772/j.issn.1001-9081.2025060755
• Multimedia computing and computer simulation • Previous Articles
Wenling LIU1, Yong LI2(
), Jiahui LI1, Houkang ZHANG1
Received:2025-07-11
Revised:2025-09-22
Accepted:2025-09-29
Online:2025-10-13
Published:2026-07-10
Contact:
Yong LI
About author:LIU Wenling, born in 2001, M. S. candidate. Her research interests include image processing.Supported by:通讯作者:
李勇
作者简介:刘雯玲(2001—),女,四川成都人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向:图像处理基金资助:CLC Number:
Wenling LIU, Yong LI, Jiahui LI, Houkang ZHANG. Unsupervised dehazing method for remote sensing images with non-uniform haze[J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2026, 46(7): 2297-2306.
刘雯玲, 李勇, 李佳慧, 张厚康. 面向不均匀雾霾遥感图像的无监督去雾方法[J]. 《计算机应用》唯一官方网站, 2026, 46(7): 2297-2306.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.joca.cn/EN/10.11772/j.issn.1001-9081.2025060755
| 监督类型 | 方法 | SateHaze 1k-Thin | SateHaze 1k-Moderate | SateHaze 1k-Thick | SateHaze 1k-Average | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PSNR/dB | SSIM | PSNR/dB | SSIM | PSNR/dB | SSIM | PSNR/dB | SSIM | ||
| 监督 | AOD-Net[ | 17.15 | 0.854 | 17.93 | 0.837 | 15.82 | 0.768 | 16.97 | 0.820 |
| GCA-Net[ | 20.97 | 0.888 | 20.43 | 0.876 | 17.37 | 0.815 | 19.59 | 0.860 | |
| 4KDehazing[ | 22.24 | 0.937 | 21.73 | 0.916 | 19.33 | 0.896 | 21.10 | 0.916 | |
| FFA-Net[ | 23.25 | 0.945 | 22.72 | 0.930 | 19.20 | 0.894 | 21.72 | 0.923 | |
| DehazeFormer[ | 23.12 | 0.934 | 20.84 | 0.904 | 22.82 | 0.930 | |||
| 无监督 | CycleGAN[ | 17.76 | 0.863 | 17.66 | 0.824 | 16.04 | 0.758 | 17.15 | 0.815 |
| Cycle-Dehaze[ | 21.24 | 0.925 | 19.21 | 0.861 | 18.29 | 0.853 | 19.58 | 0.880 | |
| ADE-CycleGAN[ | 21.38 | 0.912 | 20.59 | 0.887 | 18.87 | 0.867 | 20.28 | 0.889 | |
| Cycle-SNSPGAN[ | 22.90 | 0.941 | 21.74 | 0.915 | 19.65 | 0.897 | 21.43 | 0.918 | |
| DedustGAN[ | 24.45 | 0.950 | |||||||
| 本文方法 | 25.35 | 0.961 | 24.71 | 0.945 | 22.72 | 0.922 | 24.26 | 0.943 | |
Tab. 1 Quantitative comparison of different methods on SateHaze 1k dataset
| 监督类型 | 方法 | SateHaze 1k-Thin | SateHaze 1k-Moderate | SateHaze 1k-Thick | SateHaze 1k-Average | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PSNR/dB | SSIM | PSNR/dB | SSIM | PSNR/dB | SSIM | PSNR/dB | SSIM | ||
| 监督 | AOD-Net[ | 17.15 | 0.854 | 17.93 | 0.837 | 15.82 | 0.768 | 16.97 | 0.820 |
| GCA-Net[ | 20.97 | 0.888 | 20.43 | 0.876 | 17.37 | 0.815 | 19.59 | 0.860 | |
| 4KDehazing[ | 22.24 | 0.937 | 21.73 | 0.916 | 19.33 | 0.896 | 21.10 | 0.916 | |
| FFA-Net[ | 23.25 | 0.945 | 22.72 | 0.930 | 19.20 | 0.894 | 21.72 | 0.923 | |
| DehazeFormer[ | 23.12 | 0.934 | 20.84 | 0.904 | 22.82 | 0.930 | |||
| 无监督 | CycleGAN[ | 17.76 | 0.863 | 17.66 | 0.824 | 16.04 | 0.758 | 17.15 | 0.815 |
| Cycle-Dehaze[ | 21.24 | 0.925 | 19.21 | 0.861 | 18.29 | 0.853 | 19.58 | 0.880 | |
| ADE-CycleGAN[ | 21.38 | 0.912 | 20.59 | 0.887 | 18.87 | 0.867 | 20.28 | 0.889 | |
| Cycle-SNSPGAN[ | 22.90 | 0.941 | 21.74 | 0.915 | 19.65 | 0.897 | 21.43 | 0.918 | |
| DedustGAN[ | 24.45 | 0.950 | |||||||
| 本文方法 | 25.35 | 0.961 | 24.71 | 0.945 | 22.72 | 0.922 | 24.26 | 0.943 | |
| 监督类型 | 方法 | PSNR/dB | SSIM |
|---|---|---|---|
| 监督 | AOD-Net[ | 20.88 | 0.856 |
| GCA-Net[ | 23.37 | 0.854 | |
| 4KDehazing[ | 26.45 | 0.946 | |
| FFA-Net[ | 31.68 | 0.954 | |
| DehazeFormer[ | 32.13 | 0.965 | |
| 无监督 | CycleGAN[ | 20.20 | 0.853 |
| Cycle-Dehaze[ | 24.23 | 0.927 | |
| ADE-CycleGAN[ | 24.36 | 0.930 | |
| Cycle-SNSPGAN[ | 29.21 | 0.959 | |
| DedustGAN[ | |||
| 本文方法 | 33.54 | 0.972 |
Tab. 2 Quantitative comparison of different methods on RICE dataset
| 监督类型 | 方法 | PSNR/dB | SSIM |
|---|---|---|---|
| 监督 | AOD-Net[ | 20.88 | 0.856 |
| GCA-Net[ | 23.37 | 0.854 | |
| 4KDehazing[ | 26.45 | 0.946 | |
| FFA-Net[ | 31.68 | 0.954 | |
| DehazeFormer[ | 32.13 | 0.965 | |
| 无监督 | CycleGAN[ | 20.20 | 0.853 |
| Cycle-Dehaze[ | 24.23 | 0.927 | |
| ADE-CycleGAN[ | 24.36 | 0.930 | |
| Cycle-SNSPGAN[ | 29.21 | 0.959 | |
| DedustGAN[ | |||
| 本文方法 | 33.54 | 0.972 |
| 监督类型 | 方法 | NIQE(↓) | IL-NIQE(↓) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 监督 | AOD-Net[ | 4.38 | 26.93 |
| GCA-Net[ | 5.35 | 24.95 | |
| FFA-Net[ | 4.08 | 24.40 | |
| 无监督 | CycleGAN[ | 4.71 | 24.75 |
| Cycle-Dehaze[ | 4.10 | 24.75 | |
| Cycle-SNSPGAN[ | |||
| 本文方法 | 3.83 | 24.27 |
Tab. 3 Quantitative comparison of different methods on RRSD300 dataset
| 监督类型 | 方法 | NIQE(↓) | IL-NIQE(↓) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 监督 | AOD-Net[ | 4.38 | 26.93 |
| GCA-Net[ | 5.35 | 24.95 | |
| FFA-Net[ | 4.08 | 24.40 | |
| 无监督 | CycleGAN[ | 4.71 | 24.75 |
| Cycle-Dehaze[ | 4.10 | 24.75 | |
| Cycle-SNSPGAN[ | |||
| 本文方法 | 3.83 | 24.27 |
| 模块类型 | 实验编号 | 消融策略 | PSNR/dB | SSIM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 整体模块 | 1 | Baseline | 17.34 | 0.785 |
| 2 | Baseline+RMAM | 18.20 | 0.877 | |
| 3 | Baseline+RMAM+HDEM | 20.98 | 0.893 | |
| 4 | 本文方法 | 22.72 | 0.922 | |
| HDEM | 5 | 仅保留残差连接分支 | 20.45 | 0.897 |
| 6 | 仅保留逐像素加权分支 | 21.69 | 0.915 | |
| 7 | 双分支结构 | 22.72 | 0.922 |
Tab. 4 Ablation experiment results of different improvement module
| 模块类型 | 实验编号 | 消融策略 | PSNR/dB | SSIM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 整体模块 | 1 | Baseline | 17.34 | 0.785 |
| 2 | Baseline+RMAM | 18.20 | 0.877 | |
| 3 | Baseline+RMAM+HDEM | 20.98 | 0.893 | |
| 4 | 本文方法 | 22.72 | 0.922 | |
| HDEM | 5 | 仅保留残差连接分支 | 20.45 | 0.897 |
| 6 | 仅保留逐像素加权分支 | 21.69 | 0.915 | |
| 7 | 双分支结构 | 22.72 | 0.922 |
| [1] | Han W, Zhang X, Wang Y, et al. A survey of machine learning and deep learning in remote sensing of geological environment: challenges, advances, and opportunities [J]. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 2023, 202: 87-113. |
| [2] | Quamar M M, Al-Ramadan B, Khan K, et al. Advancements and applications of drone-integrated geographic information system technology: a review [J]. Remote Sensing, 2023, 15(20): No.5039. |
| [3] | Qiu Z, Gong T, Liang Z, et al. Perception-oriented UAV image dehazing based on super-pixel scene prior [J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2024, 62: No.5913519. |
| [4] | Jackson J, Agyekum K O, Sarpong S, et al. Hazy to hazy free: a comprehensive survey of multi-image, single-image, and CNN-based algorithms for dehazing [J]. Computer Science Review, 2024, 54: No.100669. |
| [5] | Gui J, Cong X, Cao Y, et al. A comprehensive survey and taxonomy on single image dehazing based on deep learning [J]. ACM Computing Surveys, 2023, 55(13s): No.279. |
| [6] | Agrawal S C, Jalal A S. A comprehensive review on analysis and implementation of recent image dehazing methods [J]. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 2022, 29(7): 4799-4850. |
| [7] | Zhao L, Zhang Y, Cui Y. A multi-scale U-shaped attention network-based GAN method for single image dehazing [J]. Human-centric Computing and Information Sciences, 2021, 11: No.38. |
| [8] | Zhang X, Zhang L, Chu M, et al. DU-Net: a new double U-shaped network for single image dehazing [J]. Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation, 2024, 100: No.104132. |
| [9] | Chen D, He M, Fan Q, et al. Gated context aggregation network for image dehazing and deraining [C]// WACV 2019. Piscataway: IEEE, 2019: 1375-1383. |
| [10] | Qin X, Wang Z, Bai Y, et al. FFA-Net: feature fusion attention network for single image dehazing [C]// AAAI 2020. Palo Alto: AAAI Press, 2020: 11908-11915. |
| [11] | Wang S, Zhang L. Dynamic mutual enhancement network for single remote sensing image dehazing [C]// ICIP 2022. Piscataway: IEEE, 2022: 3336-3340. |
| [12] | Lin Z, Luo Q, Jiang Y, et al. Image defogging based on multi-input and multi-scale UNet [J]. Signal, Image and Video Processing, 2023, 17(4): 1143-1151. |
| [13] | Du Y, Li J, Sheng Q, et al. Dehazing network: asymmetric UNet based on physical model [J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2024, 62: No.5607412. |
| [14] | Ali A M, El-Rabaie E S M, Ramadan K F, et al. CLEAR-Net: a cascaded local and external attention network for enhanced dehazing of remote sensing images [J]. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 2025: 1-20. |
| [15] | Zhang Y, Liu S, Dong C, et al. Multiple cycle-in-cycle generative adversarial networks for unsupervised image super-resolution [J]. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2020, 29: 1101-1112. |
| [16] | Gao G, Lai H, Jia Z. Unsupervised image dedusting via a cycle-consistent generative adversarial network [J]. Remote Sensing, 2023, 15(5): No.1311. |
| [17] | Engin D, GENÇ A, Ekenel H K. Cycle-Dehaze: enhanced CycleGAN for single image dehazing [C]// CVPR Workshops 2018. Piscataway: IEEE, 2018: 938-946. |
| [18] | Wang Y, Yan X, Guan D, et al. Cycle-SNSPGAN: towards real-world image dehazing via cycle spectral normalized soft likelihood estimation patch GAN [J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2022, 23(11): 20368-20382. |
| [19] | Sun H, Zhang Y, Chen P, et al. Scale-free heterogeneous CycleGAN for defogging from a single image for autonomous driving in fog [J]. Neural Computing and Applications, 2023, 35(5): 3737-3751. |
| [20] | Yan B, Yang Z, Sun H, et al. ADE-CycleGAN: a detail enhanced image dehazing CycleGAN network [J]. Sensors, 2023, 23(6): No.3294. |
| [21] | Meng X, Huang J, Li Z, et al. DedustGAN: unpaired learning for image dedusting based on retinex with GANs [J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2024, 243: No.122844. |
| [22] | Li C, Zhang X, Wang H, et al. UTCR-Dehaze: U-Net and Transformer-based cycle-consistent generative adversarial network for unpaired remote sensing image dehazing [J]. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2025, 158(Pt B): No.111385. |
| [23] | Dwivedi P, Chakraborty S. FrTrGAN: single image dehazing using the frequency component of transmission maps in the generative adversarial network [J]. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 2025, 255: No.104336. |
| [24] | 孙航,付秋月,李勃辉,等.基于跨层注意力特征交互和多尺度通道注意力的单幅图像去雾网络[J].电子学报, 2024, 52(11): 3711-3726. |
| Sun Hang, Fu Qiuyue, Li Bohui, et al. Cross-layer attention feature interaction and multi-scale channel attention network for single image dehazing [J]. Acta Electronica Sinica, 2024, 52(11): 3711-3726. | |
| [25] | Jin M, Wang P, Li Y. HyA-GAN: remote sensing image cloud removal based on hybrid attention generation adversarial network [J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2024, 45(6): 1755-1773. |
| [26] | Kim N, Choi I S, Han S S, et al. DA-Net: dual attention network for haze removal in remote sensing image [J]. IEEE Access, 2024, 12: 136297-136312. |
| [27] | Dong W, Wang C, Sun H, et al. End-to-end detail-enhanced dehazing network for remote sensing images [J]. Remote Sensing, 2024, 16(2): No.225. |
| [28] | Wang J, Wang S, Wu M, et al. Multi-scale adaptive detail enhancement dehazing network for autonomous driving perception images [J]. Pattern Analysis and Applications, 2025, 28(2): No.51. |
| [29] | Jiang B, Wang J, Wu Y, et al. A dehazing method for remote sensing image under nonuniform hazy weather based on deep learning network [J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2023, 61: No.4101717. |
| [30] | Feng Y, Su Z, Ma L, et al. Bridging the gap between haze scenarios: a unified image dehazing model [J]. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 2024, 34(11): 11070-11085. |
| [31] | Guo F, Yang J, Liu Z, et al. Haze removal for single image: a comprehensive review [J]. Neurocomputing, 2023, 537: 85-109. |
| [32] | Wang T, Zhao L, Huang P, et al. Haze concentration adaptive network for image dehazing [J]. Neurocomputing, 2021, 439: 75-85. |
| [33] | Li X, Hua Z, Li J. Attention-based adaptive feature selection for multi-stage image dehazing [J]. The Visual Computer, 2023, 39(2): 663-678. |
| [34] | Shen J, Tong L, Li S, et al. PromptHC: multi-attention prompt guided haze-weather crowd counting [J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2025, 286: No.128023. |
| [35] | Zhang X, Wang T, Wang J, et al. Pyramid channel-based feature attention network for image dehazing [J]. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 2020, 197/198: No.103003. |
| [36] | Li C, Tang Z, Qiao J, et al. Multi-scale adaptive feature network drainage pipe image dehazing method based on multiple attention [J]. Electronics, 2024, 13(7): No.1406. |
| [37] | Shen H, Zhang C, Li H, et al. A spatial-spectral adaptive haze removal method for visible remote sensing images [J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2020, 58(9): 6168-6180. |
| [38] | Liu X, Hsieh C J. Rob-GAN: generator, discriminator, and adversarial attacker [C]// CVPR 2019. Piscataway: IEEE, 2019: 11226-11235. |
| [39] | Ma J, Xu H, Jiang J, et al. DDcGAN: a dual-discriminator conditional generative adversarial network for multi-resolution image fusion [J]. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2020, 29: 4980-4995. |
| [40] | Pan Z, Yu W, Wang B, et al. Loss functions of Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs): opportunities and challenges [J]. IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computational Intelligence, 2020, 4(4): 500-522. |
| [41] | Huang B, Zhi L, Yang C, et al. Single satellite optical imagery dehazing using SAR image prior based on conditional generative adversarial networks [C]// WACV 2020. Piscataway: IEEE, 2020: 1795-1802. |
| [42] | Lin D, Xu G, Wang X, et al. A remote sensing image dataset for cloud removal [PP/OL]. arXiv (2019-01-03) [2025-04-21]. . |
| [43] | Zai W, Yan L. Multi-patch hierarchical transmission channel image dehazing network based on dual attention level feature fusion [J]. Sensors, 2023, 23(16): No.7026. |
| [44] | Xu Y, Zhang H, He F, et al. Enhanced CycleGAN network with adaptive dark channel prior for unpaired single-image dehazing [J]. Entropy, 2023, 25(6): No.856. |
| [45] | Wen Y, Gao T, Zhang J, et al. Encoder-free multiaxis physics-aware fusion network for remote sensing image dehazing [J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2023, 61: No.4705915. |
| [46] | Mittal A, Soundararajan R, Bovik A C. Making a “completely blind” image quality analyzer [J]. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 2013, 20(3): 209-212. |
| [47] | Zhang L, Zhang L, Bovik A C. A feature-enriched completely blind image quality evaluator [J]. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2015, 24(8): 2579-2591. |
| [48] | Li B, Peng X, Wang Z, et al. AOD-Net: all-in-one dehazing network [C]// ICCV 2017. Piscataway: IEEE, 2017: 4780-4788. |
| [49] | Xiao B, Zheng Z, Zhuang Y, et al. Single UHD image dehazing via interpretable pyramid network [J]. Signal Processing, 2024, 214: No.109225. |
| [50] | Song Y, He Z, Qian H, et al. Vision Transformers for single image dehazing [J]. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2023, 32: 1927-1941. |
| [51] | Zhu J Y, Park T, Isola P, et al. Unpaired image-to-image translation using cycle-consistent adversarial networks [C]// ICCV 2017. Piscataway: IEEE, 2017: 2242-2251. |
| [1] | Xiuli DU, Xing GAO, Xiaoyu ZHANG, Chengsheng PAN, Qijie ZOU. Video snapshot compressive imaging reconstruction method based on dense spatio-temporal deformable attention [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2026, 46(7): 2288-2296. |
| [2] | Guoyou ZHANG, Hongyu NIE, Lihu PAN, Rundong LEI. Point-MLPBLS: point cloud semantic segmentation network based on MLP cascaded broad learning system [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2026, 46(7): 2259-2266. |
| [3] | Jinxiao ZHANG, Chenglong LI, Xinyan GAO, Ming ZHANG. 3D human pose estimation model based on temporal-spatial feature pyramid network and multi-hypothesis interaction mechanism [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2026, 46(6): 1965-1972. |
| [4] | Yunping HE, Leichun WANG, Ruirui SONG, Xiangfeng LU, Jinxiang WEI, Xiaomeng LIU. Dual-channel multimodal sentiment analysis model based on contrast invariance and reinforcement specificity [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2026, 46(6): 1767-1775. |
| [5] | Liwan YAO, Hailong LIU, Zhangfan ZENG. Frequency-domain driven and diffusion-based fusion for sonar image enhancement algorithm [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2026, 46(6): 1947-1955. |
| [6] | Xiaoqin YU, Wuyang SHAN, Junying QIU, Yu LIN, Ronghao YANG, Mao TIAN. Image tampering localization and detection network under brightness-contrast disturbances [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2026, 46(6): 1893-1903. |
| [7] | Jun QIN, Xintao JIAO, Biqing ZENG. Non-intrusive load monitoring method combining BiLSTM-Transformer and Kolmogorov-Arnold network [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2026, 46(6): 2026-2033. |
| [8] | Yasong ZHANG, Bihui CONG, Shuang XU. Graph neural network node classification model incorporating clustering coefficients [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2026, 46(6): 1855-1862. |
| [9] | Ying JING, Ran LI, Zhuo JIANG, Ziyang FU, Jingyi DU, Qi LIU, Jihang LIU. SAM Meibomian gland unified dense segmentation method with introduction of automatic prompt encoder [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2026, 46(5): 1667-1676. |
| [10] | Jing HU, Shikun CHEN, Fang WANG, Rui ZHANG, Yong WANG. Ore image segmentation with linear deformable convolution and dual-domain synergistic dynamic attention [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2026, 46(5): 1692-1702. |
| [11] | Huijie GUO, Tianfeng DOU, Zhenlin ZHANG, Kaiyuan QI, Dong WU, Zhijian QU, Zhao LI, Chongguang REN. Time-interdependency-aware dynamic Bayesian network for traffic prediction [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2026, 46(5): 1507-1517. |
| [12] | Wen PENG, Bokai ZHANG, Jinwei LIN. Chromosome cascaded classification framework integrating image texture enhancement and super-resolution [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2026, 46(5): 1647-1657. |
| [13] | Qianfei WANG, Yang LI, Deyu LI, Suge WANG. Dual-channel feature fusion representation method for short-text clustering based on large language model [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2026, 46(5): 1441-1449. |
| [14] | Baoyuan ZHENG, Chaobo HE. Graph convolutional network enhanced by graph diffusion and dual-view feature learning [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2026, 46(5): 1370-1377. |
| [15] | Ruirui SONG, Leichun WANG, Yunping HE, Jinxiang WEI, Xiangfeng LU, Xiaomeng LIU. Long time series prediction based on hybrid self-attention and differentiated normalization [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2026, 46(5): 1499-1506. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||