Journal of Computer Applications ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (10): 3161-3170.DOI: 10.11772/j.issn.1001-9081.2025080942
• Artificial intelligence • Previous Articles
Xia FENG1,2(
), Qi WANG1,3, Mingze ZHANG1,3, Haichao ZUO1,3, Guoyu WANG4,5
Received:2025-08-18
Revised:2025-08-29
Accepted:2025-09-15
Online:2026-10-21
Published:2026-10-10
Contact:
Xia FENG
About author:WANG Qi, born in 2000, M. S. His research interests include big data intelligence in civil aviation, flight ground service time prediction.Supported by:
冯霞1,2(
), 王琦1,3, 张明泽1,3, 左海超1,3, 王国钰4,5
通讯作者:
冯霞
作者简介:王琦(2000—),男,黑龙江齐齐哈尔人,硕士,主要研究方向:航空大数据智能、航班地面保障时间预测基金资助:CLC Number:
Xia FENG, Qi WANG, Mingze ZHANG, Haichao ZUO, Guoyu WANG. Flight ground service milestone event prediction based on CTrans-ATGCN[J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2026, 46(10): 3161-3170.
冯霞, 王琦, 张明泽, 左海超, 王国钰. 基于CTrans-ATGCN的航班地面保障里程碑事件预测[J]. 《计算机应用》唯一官方网站, 2026, 46(10): 3161-3170.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.joca.cn/EN/10.11772/j.issn.1001-9081.2025080942
| 属性 | 记录值 | 属性 | 记录值 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 航班计划日期 | 2023-10-21 | 卸机结束时刻 | 16:45 |
| 进港航班号 | CZ6915 | 加油结束时刻 | 16:53 |
| 离港航班号 | CZ6916 | 餐食开始时刻 | 16:39 |
| 机型 | B38M | 餐食结束时刻 | 16:47 |
| 机号 | B-1166 | 行李装载开始时刻 | 17:01 |
| 机位 | 160 | 行李装载结束时刻 | 17:10 |
| 上轮挡时刻 | 16:31 | 实际关客舱门时刻 | 17:18 |
| 靠桥时刻 | 16:33 | 实际撤桥时刻 | 17:19 |
| 开客舱门时刻 | 16:35 | 航班撤轮挡时刻 | 17:21 |
| 卸机开始时刻 | 16:37 |
Tab. 1 Examples of complete turnaround experimental data after merging and processing
| 属性 | 记录值 | 属性 | 记录值 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 航班计划日期 | 2023-10-21 | 卸机结束时刻 | 16:45 |
| 进港航班号 | CZ6915 | 加油结束时刻 | 16:53 |
| 离港航班号 | CZ6916 | 餐食开始时刻 | 16:39 |
| 机型 | B38M | 餐食结束时刻 | 16:47 |
| 机号 | B-1166 | 行李装载开始时刻 | 17:01 |
| 机位 | 160 | 行李装载结束时刻 | 17:10 |
| 上轮挡时刻 | 16:31 | 实际关客舱门时刻 | 17:18 |
| 靠桥时刻 | 16:33 | 实际撤桥时刻 | 17:19 |
| 开客舱门时刻 | 16:35 | 航班撤轮挡时刻 | 17:21 |
| 卸机开始时刻 | 16:37 |
| 事件 | 数据 | 事件 | 数据 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 靠桥 | 2 | 餐食结束 | 16 |
| 开客舱门 | 4 | 开始行李装载 | 30 |
| 卸机开始 | 6 | 结束行李装载 | 39 |
| 卸机结束 | 14 | 关客舱门 | 47 |
| 加油结束 | 22 | 撤桥 | 48 |
| 餐食开始 | 8 | 撤轮挡 | 51 |
Tab. 2 Examples of preprocessed data
| 事件 | 数据 | 事件 | 数据 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 靠桥 | 2 | 餐食结束 | 16 |
| 开客舱门 | 4 | 开始行李装载 | 30 |
| 卸机开始 | 6 | 结束行李装载 | 39 |
| 卸机结束 | 14 | 关客舱门 | 47 |
| 加油结束 | 22 | 撤桥 | 48 |
| 餐食开始 | 8 | 撤轮挡 | 51 |
| 模型 | ACDM-10 | ACDM-30 | ACDM-50 | ACDM-70 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAE | RMSE | MAE | RMSE | MAE | RMSE | MAE | RMSE | |
| ARIMA[ | 21.82 | 27.03 | 24.78 | 31.67 | 29.44 | 37.90 | 33.72 | 44.40 |
| LATC[ | 19.52 | 24.53 | 22.41 | 29.01 | 26.24 | 34.30 | 30.56 | 41.14 |
| GRU-D[ | 18.15 | 22.34 | 20.69 | 27.13 | 23.36 | 30.79 | 27.70 | 36.24 |
| STGCN[ | 15.36 | 19.67 | 19.34 | 25.76 | 22.97 | 30.12 | 25.85 | 32.75 |
| GWNet[ | 14.84 | 19.37 | 17.15 | 23.04 | 21.29 | 28.16 | 24.45 | 29.98 |
| GMAN[ | 14.32 | 18.87 | 16.77 | 22.28 | 19.03 | 25.48 | 22.69 | 28.00 |
| GraphSAGE[ | 14.18 | 18.35 | 15.67 | 19.90 | 16.21 | 22.38 | 17.24 | 25.22 |
| CTrans | 11.78 | 16.27 | 12.85 | 17.30 | 13.93 | 20.15 | 14.67 | 22.27 |
Tab. 3 Comparison of imputation accuracy evaluation indexes in non-random missing scenarios
| 模型 | ACDM-10 | ACDM-30 | ACDM-50 | ACDM-70 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAE | RMSE | MAE | RMSE | MAE | RMSE | MAE | RMSE | |
| ARIMA[ | 21.82 | 27.03 | 24.78 | 31.67 | 29.44 | 37.90 | 33.72 | 44.40 |
| LATC[ | 19.52 | 24.53 | 22.41 | 29.01 | 26.24 | 34.30 | 30.56 | 41.14 |
| GRU-D[ | 18.15 | 22.34 | 20.69 | 27.13 | 23.36 | 30.79 | 27.70 | 36.24 |
| STGCN[ | 15.36 | 19.67 | 19.34 | 25.76 | 22.97 | 30.12 | 25.85 | 32.75 |
| GWNet[ | 14.84 | 19.37 | 17.15 | 23.04 | 21.29 | 28.16 | 24.45 | 29.98 |
| GMAN[ | 14.32 | 18.87 | 16.77 | 22.28 | 19.03 | 25.48 | 22.69 | 28.00 |
| GraphSAGE[ | 14.18 | 18.35 | 15.67 | 19.90 | 16.21 | 22.38 | 17.24 | 25.22 |
| CTrans | 11.78 | 16.27 | 12.85 | 17.30 | 13.93 | 20.15 | 14.67 | 22.27 |
| 模型 | ACDM-10 | ACDM-30 | ACDM-50 | ACDM-70 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAE | RMSE | MAE | RMSE | MAE | RMSE | MAE | RMSE | |
| ARIMA[ | 24.77 | 39.17 | 26.71 | 51.61 | 30.93 | 70.40 | 35.89 | 99.68 |
| LATC[ | 22.38 | 35.58 | 25.37 | 49.69 | 29.42 | 66.32 | 33.11 | 87.90 |
| GRU-D[ | 21.15 | 34.26 | 23.05 | 37.65 | 26.34 | 51.89 | 29.95 | 66.37 |
| STGCN[ | 18.74 | 31.71 | 20.78 | 36.25 | 23.89 | 44.26 | 26.42 | 52.18 |
| GWNet[ | 17.98 | 30.47 | 19.66 | 33.98 | 22.70 | 39.65 | 25.15 | 45.74 |
| GMAN[ | 17.75 | 30.18 | 19.35 | 33.42 | 21.38 | 37.94 | 23.42 | 43.23 |
| GraphSAGE[ | 17.67 | 29.98 | 18.06 | 31.98 | 19.89 | 35.72 | 20.73 | 40.73 |
| CTrans | 16.32 | 28.58 | 17.45 | 31.02 | 18.71 | 33.98 | 19.65 | 37.65 |
Tab. 4 Comparison of imputation accuracy evaluation indexes in random missing scenarios
| 模型 | ACDM-10 | ACDM-30 | ACDM-50 | ACDM-70 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAE | RMSE | MAE | RMSE | MAE | RMSE | MAE | RMSE | |
| ARIMA[ | 24.77 | 39.17 | 26.71 | 51.61 | 30.93 | 70.40 | 35.89 | 99.68 |
| LATC[ | 22.38 | 35.58 | 25.37 | 49.69 | 29.42 | 66.32 | 33.11 | 87.90 |
| GRU-D[ | 21.15 | 34.26 | 23.05 | 37.65 | 26.34 | 51.89 | 29.95 | 66.37 |
| STGCN[ | 18.74 | 31.71 | 20.78 | 36.25 | 23.89 | 44.26 | 26.42 | 52.18 |
| GWNet[ | 17.98 | 30.47 | 19.66 | 33.98 | 22.70 | 39.65 | 25.15 | 45.74 |
| GMAN[ | 17.75 | 30.18 | 19.35 | 33.42 | 21.38 | 37.94 | 23.42 | 43.23 |
| GraphSAGE[ | 17.67 | 29.98 | 18.06 | 31.98 | 19.89 | 35.72 | 20.73 | 40.73 |
| CTrans | 16.32 | 28.58 | 17.45 | 31.02 | 18.71 | 33.98 | 19.65 | 37.65 |
| 情况 | 模块 | ACDM-10 | ACDM-30 | ACDM-50 | ACDM-70 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 卷积 | 自注意力 | MAE | RMSE | MAE | RMSE | MAE | RMSE | MAE | RMSE | |
| A | 16.77 | 28.12 | 17.85 | 29.32 | 19.52 | 30.92 | 30.63 | 42.68 | ||
| B | √ | 15.35 | 26.47 | 16.32 | 27.57 | 17.37 | 29.14 | 29.45 | 41.05 | |
| C | √ | 15.69 | 26.74 | 16.69 | 27.79 | 18.01 | 29.48 | 29.58 | 41.49 | |
| D | √ | √ | 14.05 | 22.43 | 15.15 | 24.16 | 16.32 | 27.07 | 17.16 | 29.96 |
Tab. 5 Results of imputation method ablation experiments
| 情况 | 模块 | ACDM-10 | ACDM-30 | ACDM-50 | ACDM-70 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 卷积 | 自注意力 | MAE | RMSE | MAE | RMSE | MAE | RMSE | MAE | RMSE | |
| A | 16.77 | 28.12 | 17.85 | 29.32 | 19.52 | 30.92 | 30.63 | 42.68 | ||
| B | √ | 15.35 | 26.47 | 16.32 | 27.57 | 17.37 | 29.14 | 29.45 | 41.05 | |
| C | √ | 15.69 | 26.74 | 16.69 | 27.79 | 18.01 | 29.48 | 29.58 | 41.49 | |
| D | √ | √ | 14.05 | 22.43 | 15.15 | 24.16 | 16.32 | 27.07 | 17.16 | 29.96 |
| 模型 | ACDM-10 | ACDM-30 | ACDM-50 | ACDM-70 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAE | RMSE | MAE | RMSE | MAE | RMSE | MAE | RMSE | |
| CTrans+GCN | 15.57 | 20.36 | 17.81 | 22.46 | 19.58 | 24.67 | 25.31 | 31.75 |
| CTrans+GRU | 13.25 | 19.57 | 16.25 | 21.94 | 18.33 | 23.54 | 27.81 | 36.80 |
| CTrans+ATGCN | 10.56 | 14.06 | 12.05 | 15.08 | 13.11 | 16.13 | 14.76 | 18.42 |
| IGITS-LSTM[ | 11.95 | 14.53 | 13.54 | 15.99 | 15.63 | 16.72 | 25.32 | 60.89 |
| SBDGCNM[ | 10.03 | 13.74 | 11.62 | 15.16 | 12.37 | 17.68 | 15.21 | 19.38 |
Tab. 6 Experimental results of “imputation + prediction” methods
| 模型 | ACDM-10 | ACDM-30 | ACDM-50 | ACDM-70 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAE | RMSE | MAE | RMSE | MAE | RMSE | MAE | RMSE | |
| CTrans+GCN | 15.57 | 20.36 | 17.81 | 22.46 | 19.58 | 24.67 | 25.31 | 31.75 |
| CTrans+GRU | 13.25 | 19.57 | 16.25 | 21.94 | 18.33 | 23.54 | 27.81 | 36.80 |
| CTrans+ATGCN | 10.56 | 14.06 | 12.05 | 15.08 | 13.11 | 16.13 | 14.76 | 18.42 |
| IGITS-LSTM[ | 11.95 | 14.53 | 13.54 | 15.99 | 15.63 | 16.72 | 25.32 | 60.89 |
| SBDGCNM[ | 10.03 | 13.74 | 11.62 | 15.16 | 12.37 | 17.68 | 15.21 | 19.38 |
| [1] | Jeeradist T. Using Airport Collaborative Decision Making (A-CDM) network to improve aviation industry service quality[J]. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology, 2023, 15(1): 69-81. |
| [2] | 中国民航局. :机场协同决策系统技术规范 [S]. |
| Civil Aviation Administration of China. : technical specification for airport collaborative decision making system [S]. | |
| [3] | Tang F, Liu S. Research of aircraft ground service scheduling problems[C]// CCDC 2016. Piscataway: IEEE, 2016: 3405-3410. |
| [4] | Yuan G, Zhi H, Fei J. A prediction method based on neural network for flight turnaround time at airport[C]// ISCID 2015 — Volume 2. Piscataway: IEEE, 2015: 219-222. |
| [5] | 邢志伟,李彪,朱慧,等. 基于深度神经网络的航班保障时间预测研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2020, 32(4): 678-686. |
| Xing Zhiwei, Li Biao, Zhu Hui, et al. Research on flight ground service time prediction based on deep neural network[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2020, 32(4): 678-686. | |
| [6] | Mehrotra D V, Liu F, Permutt T. Missing data in clinical trials: control-based mean imputation and sensitivity analysis[J]. Pharmaceutical Statistics, 2017, 16(5): 378-392. |
| [7] | Lebel J M, Kratz F, Bloch G. Missing values rebuilding by prediction and ARIMA modelling in time series[J]. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 1989, 22(6): 357-361. |
| [8] | Chen X, Lei M, Saunier N, et al. Low-rank autoregressive tensor completion for spatiotemporal traffic data imputation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2022, 23(8): 12301-12310. |
| [9] | Che Z, Purushotham S, Cho K, et al. Recurrent neural networks for multivariate time series with missing values[J]. Scientific Reports, 2018, 8: No.6085. |
| [10] | Liu J, Ong G P, Chen X. GraphSAGE-based traffic speed forecasting for segment network with sparse data[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2022, 23(3): 1755-1766. |
| [11] | Cui Z, Ke R, Pu Z, et al. Stacked bidirectional and unidirectional LSTM recurrent neural network for forecasting network-wide traffic state with missing values[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2020, 118: No.102674. |
| [12] | Cui Z, Lin L, Pu Z, et al. Graph Markov network for traffic forecasting with missing data[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2020, 117: No.102671. |
| [13] | Kaur M, Singh S, Aggarwal N. Missing traffic data imputation using a dual-stage error-corrected boosting regressor with uncertainty estimation[J]. Information Sciences, 2022, 586: 344-373. |
| [14] | Zhou H, Ren D, Xia H, et al. AST-GNN: an attention-based spatio-temporal graph neural network for interaction-aware pedestrian trajectory prediction[J]. Neurocomputing, 2021, 445: 298-308. |
| [15] | Folch-Fortuny A, Arteaga F, Ferrer A. Assessment of maximum likelihood PCA missing data imputation[J]. Journal of Chemometrics, 2016, 30(7): 386-393. |
| [16] | Tian Y, Zhang K, Li J, et al. LSTM-based traffic flow prediction with missing data[J]. Neurocomputing, 2018, 318: 297-305. |
| [17] | Liu Z, Zhang Q, Gao R, et al. Optimized decision method based on K-means-TKNN for coherent optical communication systems[C]// ICOCN 2021. Piscataway: IEEE, 2021: 1-3. |
| [18] | 邢志伟,孙恪,罗谦,等. 基于图神经网络的航班地面保障数据插补算法[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2025, 51(5): 1528-1538. |
| Xing Zhiwei, Sun Ke, Luo Qian, et al. Imputation algorithm for flight ground support data based on graph neural network[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2025, 51(5): 1528-1538. | |
| [19] | Liu C, Chen Y, Wang H, et al. Airport flight ground service time prediction with missing data using graph convolutional neural network imputation and bidirectional sliding mechanism[J]. Applied Soft Computing, 2023, 133: No.109941. |
| [20] | 中国民航大学. 一种航班地面保障数据填补模型构建方法:CN202411519886.0[P]. 2025-02-18. |
| Civil Aviation University of China. A construction method of flight ground support data imputation model: CN202411519886.0[P]. 2025-02-18. | |
| [21] | Yu B, Yin H, Zhu Z. Spatio-temporal graph convolutional networks: a deep learning framework for traffic forecasting[C]// IJCAI 2018. California: IJCAI, 2018: 3634-3640. |
| [22] | Wu Z, Pan S, Long G, et al. Graph WaveNet for deep spatial-temporal graph modeling[C]// IJCAI 2019. California: IJCAI, 2019: 1907-1913. |
| [23] | Zheng C, Fan X, Wang C, et al. GMAN: a graph multi-attention network for traffic prediction[J]. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2020, 34(1): 1234-1241. |
| [1] | Changqing JI, Ziying ZHANG, Zumin WANG. Continuous non-invasive blood pressure prediction method based on multi-scale Transformer with enhanced graph neural network [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2026, 46(9): 3043-3053. |
| [2] | Yufeng OU, Chia-Hung WANG. Small-object defect detection method for printed circuit boards based on dual-branch feature extraction [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2026, 46(9): 2977-2986. |
| [3] | Yifan WANG, Hu HAN, Dong LI, Yating FAN, Lin LI. Heterogeneous enhancement and multi-source knowledge fusion for aspect-based sentiment analysis [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2026, 46(9): 2752-2760. |
| [4] | Lixia XIE, Chaoyue CAO, Hongyu YANG. ADS-B attack detection method based on improved DeepLabV3+ [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2026, 46(9): 2867-2876. |
| [5] | Hao WU, Yulu HUANG, Xuan FENG, Qiong ZHANG, Xiaobo ZHANG. Hybrid CNN-Transformer multi-task learning method with dynamic task weighting for radar signal feature recognition [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2026, 46(9): 3017-3024. |
| [6] | Musheng CHEN, Wenqing FU, Xiaohong QIU, Junhua WU, Qiang WEN. Aspect sentiment triplet extraction based on graph convolutional network and cross-domain data augmentation [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2026, 46(8): 2432-2439. |
| [7] | Jielong BAI, Chenyun FANG, Zhiwei QIAO. Sparse CT artifact suppresion Transformer network based on multi-scale attention adaptive fusion [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2026, 46(8): 2660-2667. |
| [8] | Guanghui LI, Licheng QU. Dynamic dilated convolution and hierarchical local-global attention model based on improved Lite-Mono architecture [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2026, 46(8): 2567-2576. |
| [9] | Huihui LYU, Zhaoman ZHONG, Yu ZHANG, Jidong FAN. Syntactically enhanced aspect-based sentiment analysis via mutual information maximization and contrastive learning [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2026, 46(8): 2440-2446. |
| [10] | Yuanhang HUANG, Na RONG. Model-free photovoltaic hosting capacity assessment method using attention mechanism and deep reinforcement learning [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2026, 46(8): 2708-2715. |
| [11] | Xiaojin GUO, Xuyang SUI, Kenan ZHOU. Channel estimation of STAR-RIS-assisted hybrid-field communication system based on deep learning [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2026, 46(8): 2548-2554. |
| [12] | Pengyu CHEN, Baojun TIAN, Lichang ZHAO, Jiandong FANG. Learning path recommendation model integrating multi-behavior modeling and reinforcement learning [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2026, 46(8): 2485-2493. |
| [13] | Wei LIU, Weigang LI, Zhiqiang TIAN. Representation learning method of hierarchical rotation-invariant geometric structure for point cloud classification and segmentation [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2026, 46(8): 2594-2602. |
| [14] | Ming LIU, Dongqi SHEN, Ziyang MENG. Point cloud registration network with dual-branch multi-level feature fusion [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2026, 46(8): 2584-2593. |
| [15] | Fengchun LIU, Xinying SHAO, Chunying ZHANG, Liya WANG, Jing REN. FCMdepth: monocular depth estimation framework with multi-scale feature optimization [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2026, 46(8): 2603-2611. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||