Improved image poisson denoising model based on fractional variation

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1087.2013.01100

Journal of Computer Applications ›› 2013, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (04): 1100-1102.DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1087.2013.01100

• Network and distributed techno • Previous Articles Next Articles

Improved image poisson denoising model based on fractional variation

HU Xuegang¹,²,LI Yu¹

1. College of Computer Science and Technology, Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Chongqing 400065, China
2. Research Center of System Theory and Application, Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Chongqing 400065, China

Received:2012-10-11 Revised:2012-11-29 Online:2013-04-23 Published:2013-04-01
Contact: LI Yu

基于分数阶变分的图像泊松去噪模型

胡学刚¹,²,李妤¹

1. 重庆邮电大学计算机科学与技术学院，重庆 400065
2. 重庆邮电大学系统理论及应用研究中心，重庆400065

通讯作者: 李妤
作者简介:胡学刚(1965-)，男，重庆人，教授，博士，主要研究方向：偏微分方程、数字图像处理；李妤(1988-)，女，四川巴中人，硕士研究生，主要研究方向：图形图像处理。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(51005237);重庆市教委科研基金资助项目(KJ100505)

Abstract

Abstract: An effective Poisson denoising model based on fractional derivative for images with Poisson noise was proposed to improve the denoising effect. The model inherited the advantages of total variation model to eliminate noise. Furthermore, due to the advantage of property of amplitude-frequency in fractional differentiation, it can protect "weak information" well in processing specifics of image and texture characteristics. The numerical experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method of fractional variation to eliminate noise is better than traditional integer variation and can protect the detail characteristics of image edges.

Key words: Poisson noise, Total Variation (TV), fractional differentiation, image denoising, edge detail

摘要： 为了进一步提高图像去噪的效果，针对图像泊松噪声的特点，提出了一种有效的基于分数阶导数的图像泊松去噪的变分模型。该模型继承了全变分模型去噪效果良好的优点，并且很好地利用分数阶微分特有的幅频特性优势，在处理图像细节和纹理特征方面很好的保留了图像的“弱信息”。数值实验结果表明，该分数阶变分方法的去噪效果优于传统的整数阶变分方法，能很好地保留图像的边缘细节特征。

关键词: 泊松噪声, 全变分方法, 分数阶微分, 图像去噪, 边缘细节

CLC Number:

TP391.41

HU Xuegang LI Yu. Improved image poisson denoising model based on fractional variation[J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2013, 33(04): 1100-1102.

胡学刚李妤. 基于分数阶变分的图像泊松去噪模型[J]. 计算机应用, 2013, 33(04): 1100-1102.

References

［1］RUDIN L, OSHER S, FATEMI E. Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms［J］. Physica D:Nonlinear Phenomena,1992, 60(1/2/3/4):259-268.

［2］DRAPARA C S. A nonlinear total variation-based denoising method with regularization parameters［J］. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 2009, 56(3):582-586.

［3］CHINNA R B, MADHAVI L M. A combination of wavelet and fractal image denoising technique［J］. International Journal of Electronics Engineering, 2010, 2(2):259-264.

［4］GHAZEL M, FREEMAN G H, VRSCAY E R. Fractal image denoising［J］. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2003, 12(12):1560-1578.

［5］LANDI G, LOLI P E. An efficient method for nonnegatively constrained total variation-based denoising of medical images corrupted by Poisson noise［J］. Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics,2012, 36(1):38-46.

［6］STEPHEN K L, MICHAEL H, KNOLL F, et al.A total variation based approach to correcting surface coil magnetic resonance images［J］. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 2011, 218(2): 219-232.

［7］GILBOA G, SOCHEN N, ZEEVI Y Y. Variational denoising of partly textured images by spatially varying constraints［J］. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2006, 15(8):2281-2289.

［8］LI F, SHEN C M, FAN J S, et al. Image restoration combing a total variational filter and a fourth-order filter［J］. Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation, 2007, 18(4):322-330.

［9］孙玉宝, 韦志辉, 吴敏, 等. 稀疏性正则化的图像泊松去噪算法[J]. 电子学报, 2011, 39(2): 285-290.

［10］胡学刚, 张龙涛, 蒋伟. 基于偏微分方程的变分去噪模型［J］. 计算机应用, 2012,32(7): 1879-1881, 1901.

［11］ZHANG B, FADILJ M, STARCK J-L. Wavelets, ridgelets and curvelets for poisson noise removal［J］. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2008, 17(7)：1093-1108.

［12］LE T, CHARTRAND R, ASAKI T J. A variational approach to reconstructing images corrupted by Poisson noise ［J］. Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, 2007, 27(3):257-263.

［13］PU Y F, ZHOU J L, YUAN X. Fractional differential mask: a fractional differential-based approach for multiscale texture enhancement［J］. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2010, 19(2):491-511.

［14］RICHARDSON W. Bayesian-based iterative method of image restoration［J］. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1972, 62(1):1917-1983.

［15］LUCY L. An iterative technique for the rectification of observed distributions［J］. Astronomical Journal, 1974, 79(6):745-754.

［16］OPPENHEIM A V. Signals and systems［M］.2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, USA: Prentice Hall, 1997.

［17］ORTIGUEIRA M D. A coherent approach to noninteger order derivatives[J]. Signal Processing, 2006, 86(10): 2505-2515.

[1]	Yuwei DING, Hongbo SHI, Jie LI, Min LIANG. Image denoising network based on local and global feature decoupling [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2024, 44(8): 2571-2579.
[2]	Yi ZHENG, Cunyi LIAO, Tianqian ZHANG, Ji WANG, Shouyin LIU. Image denoising-based cell-level RSRP estimation method for urban areas [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2024, 44(3): 855-862.
[3]	Ruifeng HOU, Pengcheng ZHANG, Liyuan ZHANG, Zhiguo GUI, Yi LIU, Haowen ZHANG, Shubin WANG. Iterative denoising network based on total variation regular term expansion [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2024, 44(3): 916-921.
[4]	Pengbo WANG, Wuyang SHAN, Jun LI, Mao TIAN, Deng ZOU, Zhanfeng FAN. Robust splicing forensic algorithm against high-intensity salt-and-pepper noise [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2024, 44(10): 3177-3184.
[5]	Anyang LIU, Huaici ZHAO, Wenlong CAI, Zechao XU, Ruideng XIE. Adaptive image deblurring generative adversarial network algorithm based on active discrimination mechanism [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2023, 43(7): 2288-2294.
[6]	Linkai HAN, Jiangwei YAO, Kunfeng WANG. Visible and infrared image fusion by preserving gradients and contours [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2023, 43(11): 3574-3578.
[7]	HU Ziqi, XIE Kai, WEN Chang, LI Meiran, HE Jianbiao. Low dose CT image enhancement based on generative adversarial network [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2023, 43(1): 280-288.
[8]	Huazhong JIN, Xiuyang ZHANG, Zhiwei YE, Wenqi ZHANG, Xiaoyu XIA. Image denoising model based on approximate U-shaped network structure [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2022, 42(8): 2571-2577.
[9]	Zefang HAN, Xiong ZHANG, Hong SHANGGUAN, Xinglong HAN, Jing HAN, Gang FENG, Xueying CUI. Artifacts sensing generative adversarial network for low-dose CT denoising [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2022, 42(7): 2301-2310.
[10]	Chenyu GE, Liang DONG, Yikun XU, Yi CHANG, Hongming ZHANG. Global-scale radar data restoration algorithm based on total variation and low-rank group sparsity [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2021, 41(11): 3353-3361.
[11]	YANG Wenxia, WANG Meng, ZHANG Liang. Semantic face image inpainting based on U-Net with dense blocks [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2020, 40(12): 3651-3657.
[12]	WANG Haipeng, JIANG Ailian, LI Pengxiang. Newton-soft threshold iteration algorithm for robust principal component analysis [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2020, 40(11): 3133-3138.
[13]	TAO Yongpeng, JING Yu, XU Cong. Image denoising algorithm based on grouped dictionaries and variational model [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2019, 39(2): 551-555.
[14]	ZHANG Wenwen, HAN Yusheng. Nonlocal self-similarity based low-rank sparse image denoising [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2018, 38(9): 2696-2700.
[15]	XIONG Xinglong, YANG Lixiang, MA Yuzhao, ZHUANG Zibo. Alerting algorithm of low-level wind shear based on fuzzy C-means [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2018, 38(3): 655-660.

Improved image poisson denoising model based on fractional variation

基于分数阶变分的图像泊松去噪模型

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics