Journal of Computer Applications ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (3): 969-979.DOI: 10.11772/j.issn.1001-9081.2025030340
• Multimedia computing and computer simulation • Previous Articles Next Articles
Ping HUANG1(
), Qing LI1, Haifeng QIU1, Chengsi WANG1, Anzi HUANG1, Long FAN2
Received:2025-04-03
Revised:2025-06-11
Accepted:2025-06-12
Online:2025-06-27
Published:2026-03-10
Contact:
Ping HUANG
About author:LI Qing, born in 1988, M. S., senior engineer. Her research interests include power informatization.
黄萍1(
), 李清1, 邱海枫1, 王程斯1, 黄安子1, 樊龙2
通讯作者:
黄萍
作者简介:李清(1988—),女,湖南衡阳人,高级工程师,硕士,主要研究方向:电力信息化CLC Number:
Ping HUANG, Qing LI, Haifeng QIU, Chengsi WANG, Anzi HUANG, Long FAN. Lightweight method for transmission line defect detection[J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2026, 46(3): 969-979.
黄萍, 李清, 邱海枫, 王程斯, 黄安子, 樊龙. 轻量化输电线路缺陷检测方法[J]. 《计算机应用》唯一官方网站, 2026, 46(3): 969-979.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.joca.cn/EN/10.11772/j.issn.1001-9081.2025030340
| 模型 | 精确率/% | 召回率/% | mAP@50/% | mAP@[50:95]/% | 浮点运算量/GFLOPs | 参数量/106 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Faster R-CNN[ | 56.6 | 53.4 | 59.2 | 51.5 | 134.38 | 41.76 |
| SSD[ | 67.2 | 64.6 | 70.1 | 62.8 | 34.86 | 35.64 |
| I2D-Net[ | 89.6 | 86.1 | 83.1 | 71.2 | 79.50 | 87.50 |
| YOLOv3[ | 88.7 | 89.1 | 91.6 | 74.3 | 283.10 | 103.70 |
| YOLOv5 | 91.5 | 84.9 | 90.6 | 72.3 | 64.40 | 25.10 |
| YOLOv8[ | 80.4 | 76.5 | 80.8 | 64.7 | 69.10 | 24.90 |
| YOLOv10[ | 88.9 | 86.4 | 90.6 | 75.1 | 64.10 | 16.50 |
| YOLOv11n[ | 88.9 | 86.8 | 89.5 | 70.0 | 6.50 | 2.59 |
| YOLOv11s | 88.0 | 88.7 | 90.7 | 67.8 | 21.60 | 9.43 |
| YOLOv11m | 88.9 | 87.5 | 90.6 | 75.1 | 68.00 | 16.11 |
| YOLOv11l | 89.7 | 89.0 | 92.1 | 77.0 | 86.70 | 25.29 |
| YOLOv11x | 90.1 | 89.5 | 92.6 | 77.3 | 195.60 | 56.89 |
| Light-YOLOx | 98.2 | 95.2 | 97.4 | 87.6 | 120.50 | 27.00 |
| Light-YOLO | 97.4 | 91.5 | 96.9 | 85.3 | 29.90 | 11.24 |
Tab. 1 Comparison of detection performance of transmission line components by different models
| 模型 | 精确率/% | 召回率/% | mAP@50/% | mAP@[50:95]/% | 浮点运算量/GFLOPs | 参数量/106 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Faster R-CNN[ | 56.6 | 53.4 | 59.2 | 51.5 | 134.38 | 41.76 |
| SSD[ | 67.2 | 64.6 | 70.1 | 62.8 | 34.86 | 35.64 |
| I2D-Net[ | 89.6 | 86.1 | 83.1 | 71.2 | 79.50 | 87.50 |
| YOLOv3[ | 88.7 | 89.1 | 91.6 | 74.3 | 283.10 | 103.70 |
| YOLOv5 | 91.5 | 84.9 | 90.6 | 72.3 | 64.40 | 25.10 |
| YOLOv8[ | 80.4 | 76.5 | 80.8 | 64.7 | 69.10 | 24.90 |
| YOLOv10[ | 88.9 | 86.4 | 90.6 | 75.1 | 64.10 | 16.50 |
| YOLOv11n[ | 88.9 | 86.8 | 89.5 | 70.0 | 6.50 | 2.59 |
| YOLOv11s | 88.0 | 88.7 | 90.7 | 67.8 | 21.60 | 9.43 |
| YOLOv11m | 88.9 | 87.5 | 90.6 | 75.1 | 68.00 | 16.11 |
| YOLOv11l | 89.7 | 89.0 | 92.1 | 77.0 | 86.70 | 25.29 |
| YOLOv11x | 90.1 | 89.5 | 92.6 | 77.3 | 195.60 | 56.89 |
| Light-YOLOx | 98.2 | 95.2 | 97.4 | 87.6 | 120.50 | 27.00 |
| Light-YOLO | 97.4 | 91.5 | 96.9 | 85.3 | 29.90 | 11.24 |
| 实验组 | 模型配置 | mAP@50/% | 帧率/(frame·s-1) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | YOLOv8 | 80.8 | 118 |
| +SepViT | 替换C2f为SepViT | 87.2 | 105 |
| +DCN | 添加可变形卷积 | 92.1 | 103 |
| +BR-FPN | 替换FPN为BR-FPN | 96.9 | 98 |
Tab. 2 Effectiveness of each module in Light-YOLO model
| 实验组 | 模型配置 | mAP@50/% | 帧率/(frame·s-1) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | YOLOv8 | 80.8 | 118 |
| +SepViT | 替换C2f为SepViT | 87.2 | 105 |
| +DCN | 添加可变形卷积 | 92.1 | 103 |
| +BR-FPN | 替换FPN为BR-FPN | 96.9 | 98 |
| +SepViT@-1 | +SepViT@-2 | +SepViT@-3 | 浮点运算量/GFLOPs | mAP@50/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| √ | 23.5 | 87.4 | ||
| √ | √ | 26.7 | 89.3 | |
| √ | √ | √ | 29.7 | 91.5 |
Tab. 3 Ablation experiment results
| +SepViT@-1 | +SepViT@-2 | +SepViT@-3 | 浮点运算量/GFLOPs | mAP@50/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| √ | 23.5 | 87.4 | ||
| √ | √ | 26.7 | 89.3 | |
| √ | √ | √ | 29.7 | 91.5 |
| mAP@50/% | 浮点运算量/GFLOPs | 参数量/106 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.0 | 96.9 | 29.9 | 11.24 |
| 0.1 | 96.5 | 26.9 | 10.12 |
| 0.2 | 96.0 | 22.4 | 9.80 |
| 0.3 | 90.2 | 19.8 | 9.20 |
| 0.4 | 89.1 | 18.1 | 8.60 |
Tab. 4 Impact of channel sparsity threshold on model performance
| mAP@50/% | 浮点运算量/GFLOPs | 参数量/106 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.0 | 96.9 | 29.9 | 11.24 |
| 0.1 | 96.5 | 26.9 | 10.12 |
| 0.2 | 96.0 | 22.4 | 9.80 |
| 0.3 | 90.2 | 19.8 | 9.20 |
| 0.4 | 89.1 | 18.1 | 8.60 |
| 类别 | DifferNet | Dual-DifferNet |
|---|---|---|
| 平均 | 88.2 | 93.5 |
| 架线悬挂 | 91.7 | 95.1 |
| 玻璃绝缘子 | 82.8 | 92.4 |
| 避雷针悬挂 | 93.0 | 97.0 |
| 聚合物绝缘子上拉环 | 86.4 | 89.0 |
| 可变张力夹 | 86.2 | 94.0 |
Tab. 5 Comparison of AUROC results on different transmission line components
| 类别 | DifferNet | Dual-DifferNet |
|---|---|---|
| 平均 | 88.2 | 93.5 |
| 架线悬挂 | 91.7 | 95.1 |
| 玻璃绝缘子 | 82.8 | 92.4 |
| 避雷针悬挂 | 93.0 | 97.0 |
| 聚合物绝缘子上拉环 | 86.4 | 89.0 |
| 可变张力夹 | 86.2 | 94.0 |
| 方法 | Jetson NX | 无人机 | |
|---|---|---|---|
推理速度/ (frame·s-1) | 吞吐量/ (frame·min-1) | 续航/min | |
| 基准方法 | 58 | 120 | 30 |
| 本文方法 | 82 | 159 | 33.0~34.5 |
Tab. 6 Performance comparison under edge deployment
| 方法 | Jetson NX | 无人机 | |
|---|---|---|---|
推理速度/ (frame·s-1) | 吞吐量/ (frame·min-1) | 续航/min | |
| 基准方法 | 58 | 120 | 30 |
| 本文方法 | 82 | 159 | 33.0~34.5 |
| [1] | SZEGEDY C, TOSHEV A, ERHAN D. Deep neural networks for object detection [C]// Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems — Volume 2. Red Hook: Curran Associates Inc., 2013: 2553-2561. |
| [2] | FAN L, ZHANG T, DU W. Optical-flow-based framework to boost video object detection performance with object enhancement [J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2021, 170: No.114544. |
| [3] | 周立明,李士心,朱致仁,等. 基于深度学习的输电线路缺陷检测研究综述[J]. 计算机科学与应用, 2023, 13(6): 1235-1243. |
| ZHOU L M, LI S X, ZHU Z R, et al. A review of transmission line defect detection research based on deep learning [J]. Computer Science and Application, 2023, 13(6): 1235-1243. | |
| [4] | 郝然,王红军,李天瑞. 基于双分支串行混合注意力的输电线路缺陷检测深度神经网络模型[J]. 计算机科学, 2024, 51(3): 135-140. |
| HAO R, WANG H J, LI T R, Deep neural network model for transmission line defect detection based on dual-branch sequential mixed attention [J]. Computer Science, 2024, 51(3): 135-140. | |
| [5] | TAO X, ZHANG D, WANG Z, et al. Detection of power line insulator defects using aerial images analyzed with convolutional neural networks [J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 2020, 50(4): 1486-1498. |
| [6] | ZHAO Z, QI H, QI Y, et al. Detection method based on automatic visual shape clustering for pin-missing defect in transmission lines[J]. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2020, 69(9): 6080-6091. |
| [7] | FU Q, LIU J, ZHANG X, et al. A small-sized defect detection method for overhead transmission lines based on convolutional neural networks [J]. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2023, 72: No.3524612. |
| [8] | 米增,连哲. 面向通用目标检测的YOLO方法研究综述[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2024, 60(21): 38-54. |
| MI Z, LIAN Z. Review of YOLO methods for universal object detection [J]. Computer Engineering and Applications, 2024, 60(21): 38-54. | |
| [9] | 李洵,甘润东,钱俊凤,等. 改进YOLOv5混合样本训练的绝缘子伞盘脱落缺陷检测方法[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2024, 60(4): 289-297. |
| LI X, GAN R D, QIAN J F, et al. Improved YOLOv5 mixed sample training for detection of insulator umbrella plate falling defects [J]. Computer Engineering and Applications, 2024, 60(4): 289-297. | |
| [10] | SREE P B, BALAJI K, BANOTH N, et al. A lightweight mobile net SSD algorithm-based identification and detection of multiple defects in ceramic insulators [J]. Journal of Modern Technology, 2024, 1(1): 59-74. |
| [11] | BAO W, DU X, WANG N, et al. A defect detection method based on BC-YOLO for transmission line components in UAV remote sensing images [J]. Remote Sensing, 2022, 14(20): No.5176. |
| [12] | SHI C, LIN L, SUN J, et al. A lightweight YOLOv5 transmission line defect detection method based on coordinate attention[C]// Proceedings of the IEEE 6th Information Technology and Mechatronics Engineering Conference. Piscataway: IEEE, 2022: 1779-1785. |
| [13] | 孙阳,李佳. 基于通道剪枝的YOLOv7-tiny输电线路异物检测算法[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2024, 60(14): 319-328. |
| SUN Y, LI J. YOLOv7-tiny transmission line foreign object detection algorithm based on channel pruning [J]. Computer Engineering and Applications, 2024, 60(14): 319-328. | |
| [14] | REIS D, KUPEC J, HONG J, et al. Real-time flying object detection with YOLOv8 [EB/OL]. [2024-10-02].. |
| [15] | LI W, WANG X, XIA X, et al. SepViT: separable Vision Transformer [EB/OL]. [2024-01-03].. |
| [16] | WANG R, SHIVANNA R, CHENG D, et al. DCN V2: improved deep & cross network and practical lessons for web-scale learning to rank systems [C]// Proceedings of the Web Conference 2021. New York: ACM, 2021: 1785-1797. |
| [17] | ANNAVARAPU C S R, PARISAPOGU, S A B, KEETHA N V, et al. A Bi-FPN-based encoder-decoder model for lung nodule image segmentation [J]. Diagnostics, 2023, 13(8): No.1406. |
| [18] | DEY R, SALEM F M. Gate-variants of Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) neural networks [C]// Proceedings of the IEEE 60th International Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems. Piscataway: IEEE, 2017: 1597-1600. |
| [19] | LOMENICK B, HAO R, JONAI N, et al. Target identification using drug affinity responsive target stability [J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2009, 106(51): 21984-21989. |
| [20] | RUDOLPH M, WANDT B, ROSENHAHN B. Same same but DifferNet: semi-supervised defect detection with normalizing flows[C]// Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision. Piscataway: IEEE, 2021: 1906-1915. |
| [21] | SONG C H, HAN H J, AVRITHIS Y. All the attention you need: global-local, spatial-channel attention for image retrieval [C]// Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision. Piscataway: IEEE, 2022: 439-448. |
| [22] | XI E, BING S, JIN Y. Capsule network performance on complex data [EB/OL]. [2024-09-02].. |
| [23] | MAZZIA V, SALVETTI F, CHIABERGE M. Efficient-CAPSNet: capsule network with self-attention routing [J]. Scientific Reports, 2021, 11: No.14634. |
| [24] | BUARQUE VIEIRA E SILVA A L, DE CASTRO FELIX H, SIMÕES F P M, et al. InsPLAD: a dataset and benchmark for power line asset inspection in UAV images [J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2023, 44(23): 7294-7320. |
| [25] | REN S Q, HE K, GIRSHICK R, et al. Faster R-CNN: towards real-time object detection with region proposal networks [J]. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2017, 39(6): 1137-1149. |
| [26] | LIU W, ANGUELOV D, ERHAN D, et al. SSD: single shot MultiBox detector [C]// Proceedings of the 2016 European Conference on Computer Vision, LNCS 9905. Cham: Springer, 2016: 21-37. |
| [27] | REDMON J, FARHADI A. YOLOv3: an incremental improvement[EB/OL]. [2024-11-02].. |
| [28] | WANG A, CHEN H, LIU L, et al. YOLOv10: real-time end-to-end object detection [C]// Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. Red Hook: Curran Associates Inc., 2024: 107984-108011. |
| [29] | KHANAM R, HUSSAIN M. YOLOv11: an overview of the key architectural enhancements [EB/OL]. [2025-01-14].. |
| [1] | Lu WANG, Dong LIU, Weiguang LIU. Interpretability study on deformable convolutional network and its application in butterfly species recognition models [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2025, 45(1): 261-274. |
| [2] | Zhiqiang ZHAO, Peihong MA, Xinhong HEI. Crowd counting method based on dual attention mechanism [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2024, 44(9): 2886-2892. |
| [3] | Yi ZHANG, Gangsheng CAI, Zhenmei WANG. Long non-coding RNA-disease association prediction model based on semantic and global dual attention mechanism [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2023, 43(7): 2125-2132. |
| [4] | Zhangjian JI, Ming ZHANG, Zilong WANG. High-precision object detection algorithm based on improved VarifocalNet [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2023, 43(7): 2147-2154. |
| [5] | Yongxiang GU, Xin LAN, Boyi FU, Xiaolin QIN. Object detection algorithm for remote sensing images based on geometric adaptation and global perception [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2023, 43(3): 916-922. |
| [6] | GUO Zihao, DONG Lele, QU Zhijian. Arthropod object detection method based on improved Faster RCNN [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2023, 43(1): 88-97. |
| [7] | Hanqing LIU, Xiaodong KANG, Fuqing ZHANG, Xiuyuan ZHAO, Jingyi YANG, Xiaotian WANG, Mengfan LI. Image detection algorithm of cerebral arterial stenosis by improved Libra region-convolutional neural network [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2022, 42(9): 2909-2916. |
| [8] | Tingwei QIN, Pengcheng ZHAO, Pinle QIN, Jianchao ZENG, Rui CHAI, Yongqi HUANG. Point cloud registration algorithm based on residual attention mechanism [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2022, 42(7): 2184-2191. |
| [9] | Yi ZHUANG, Haitao ZHAO. Proposal-based aggregation network for single object tracking in 3D point cloud [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2022, 42(5): 1407-1416. |
| [10] | Pinxue WANG, Shaobing ZHANG, Miao CHENG, Lian HE, Xiaoshan QIN. Coin surface defect detection algorithm based on deformable convolution and adaptive spatial feature fusion [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2022, 42(2): 638-645. |
| [11] | CHEN Jing, MAO Yingchi, CHEN Hao, WANG Longbao, WANG Zicheng. Dam defect object detection method based on improved single shot multibox detector [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2021, 41(8): 2366-2372. |
| [12] | BIAN Xiaoyong, JIANG Peiling, ZHAO Min, DING Sheng, ZHANG Xiaolong. Multi-branch neural network model based weakly supervised fine-grained image classification method [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2020, 40(5): 1295-1300. |
| [13] | MAO Wentao, YANG Chao, LIU Yamin, TIAN Siyu. Deep domain adaptation model with multi-scale residual attention for incipient fault detection of bearings [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2020, 40(10): 2890-2898. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||