Journal of Computer Applications ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (6): 1793-1800.DOI: 10.11772/j.issn.1001-9081.2025050665
• Artificial intelligence • Previous Articles
Junchi ZHANG, Naiyun ZHANG, Qun HOU(
)
Received:2025-06-16
Revised:2025-09-15
Accepted:2025-09-23
Online:2025-10-17
Published:2026-06-10
Contact:
Qun HOU
About author:ZHANG Junchi, born in 1990, Ph. D., lecturer. His research interests include natural language processing.Supported by:通讯作者:
侯群
作者简介:张俊驰(1990—),男,湖北武汉人,讲师,博士,主要研究方向:自然语言处理基金资助:CLC Number:
Junchi ZHANG, Naiyun ZHANG, Qun HOU. Complex event extraction method based on event element relation recognition and complete subgraph search[J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2026, 46(6): 1793-1800.
张俊驰, 张乃云, 侯群. 基于事件要素关系识别和完全子图搜索的复杂事件抽取方法[J]. 《计算机应用》唯一官方网站, 2026, 46(6): 1793-1800.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.joca.cn/EN/10.11772/j.issn.1001-9081.2025050665
| 方法 | 数据集 | 同类型触发词重叠样本数 | 重叠 样本数 | 总样本 数 | 事件 总数 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FewFC | 训练集 | 536 | 1 560 | 7 185 | 10 227 |
| 验证集 | 64 | 205 | 899 | 1 281 | |
| 测试集 | 62 | 210 | 898 | 1 332 | |
| DuEE | 训练集 | 17 | 1 048 | 11 958 | 13 478 |
| 验证集 | 0 | 142 | 1 498 | 1 790 |
Tab. 1 Overlapping statistics of trigger words of same type
| 方法 | 数据集 | 同类型触发词重叠样本数 | 重叠 样本数 | 总样本 数 | 事件 总数 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FewFC | 训练集 | 536 | 1 560 | 7 185 | 10 227 |
| 验证集 | 64 | 205 | 899 | 1 281 | |
| 测试集 | 62 | 210 | 898 | 1 332 | |
| DuEE | 训练集 | 17 | 1 048 | 11 958 | 13 478 |
| 验证集 | 0 | 142 | 1 498 | 1 790 |
| 超参数 | FewFC | DuEE |
|---|---|---|
| BERT隐层维度 | 768 | 768 |
| 事件类型embedding维度 | 768 | 768 |
| Span关系投影子空间维度 | 128 | 64 |
| EI关系投影子空间维度 | 128 | 64 |
| 采样事件数 | 6 | 20 |
| 训练轮数 | 30 | 40 |
| 批次大小 | 8 | 16 |
| dropout比例 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| 学习率 | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| BERT学习率 | 0.000 02 | 0.000 03 |
| Span关系阈值 | 0 | 0 |
| EI关系阈值 | -1 | 0 |
Tab. 2 Hyperparameter setting
| 超参数 | FewFC | DuEE |
|---|---|---|
| BERT隐层维度 | 768 | 768 |
| 事件类型embedding维度 | 768 | 768 |
| Span关系投影子空间维度 | 128 | 64 |
| EI关系投影子空间维度 | 128 | 64 |
| 采样事件数 | 6 | 20 |
| 训练轮数 | 30 | 40 |
| 批次大小 | 8 | 16 |
| dropout比例 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| 学习率 | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| BERT学习率 | 0.000 02 | 0.000 03 |
| Span关系阈值 | 0 | 0 |
| EI关系阈值 | -1 | 0 |
| 数据集 | 模型 | TC | AC | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P | R | F1 | P | R | F1 | ||
| FewFC | BERT-CRF-joint | 80.2 | 63.0 | 70.6 | 72.2 | 61.2 | 67.1 |
| PLMEE | 75.6 | 74.5 | 75.1 | 68.9 | 68.2 | 68.5 | |
| CasEE | 77.9 | 78.5 | 78.2 | 71.3 | 71.5 | 71.4 | |
| OneEE | 78.7 | 80.0 | 79.3 | 73.5 | 72.7 | 73.1 | |
| SACLEE | 78.1 | 79.4 | 78.7 | 71.5 | 72.7 | 71.5 | |
| UEE | 78.1 | 79.1 | 78.6 | 73.6 | 73.0 | 71.3 | |
| 本文方法 | 80.3 | 80.3 | 80.3 | 73.7 | 70.2 | 71.9 | |
| DuEE | BERT-CRF-joint | 85.9 | 73.4 | 79.2 | 75.1 | 70.2 | 72.6 |
| PLMEE | 84.5 | 86.2 | 85.3 | 75.7 | 73.9 | 74.8 | |
| CasEE | 84.0 | 87.7 | 85.8 | 72.4 | 77.9 | 75.0 | |
| OneEE | 84.9 | 88.0 | 86.4 | 79.5 | 81.1 | 80.3 | |
| SACLEE | 83.7 | 86.8 | 85.2 | 71.2 | 77.4 | 74.2 | |
| UEE | 84.2 | 87.3 | 86.1 | 78.3 | 80.3 | 73.6 | |
| 本文方法 | 86.9 | 87.6 | 87.2 | 82.6 | 80.1 | 81.3 | |
Tab. 3 Comparison of fine-grained indicators of various model extractions on FewFC and DuEE datasets
| 数据集 | 模型 | TC | AC | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P | R | F1 | P | R | F1 | ||
| FewFC | BERT-CRF-joint | 80.2 | 63.0 | 70.6 | 72.2 | 61.2 | 67.1 |
| PLMEE | 75.6 | 74.5 | 75.1 | 68.9 | 68.2 | 68.5 | |
| CasEE | 77.9 | 78.5 | 78.2 | 71.3 | 71.5 | 71.4 | |
| OneEE | 78.7 | 80.0 | 79.3 | 73.5 | 72.7 | 73.1 | |
| SACLEE | 78.1 | 79.4 | 78.7 | 71.5 | 72.7 | 71.5 | |
| UEE | 78.1 | 79.1 | 78.6 | 73.6 | 73.0 | 71.3 | |
| 本文方法 | 80.3 | 80.3 | 80.3 | 73.7 | 70.2 | 71.9 | |
| DuEE | BERT-CRF-joint | 85.9 | 73.4 | 79.2 | 75.1 | 70.2 | 72.6 |
| PLMEE | 84.5 | 86.2 | 85.3 | 75.7 | 73.9 | 74.8 | |
| CasEE | 84.0 | 87.7 | 85.8 | 72.4 | 77.9 | 75.0 | |
| OneEE | 84.9 | 88.0 | 86.4 | 79.5 | 81.1 | 80.3 | |
| SACLEE | 83.7 | 86.8 | 85.2 | 71.2 | 77.4 | 74.2 | |
| UEE | 84.2 | 87.3 | 86.1 | 78.3 | 80.3 | 73.6 | |
| 本文方法 | 86.9 | 87.6 | 87.2 | 82.6 | 80.1 | 81.3 | |
| 模型 | FewFC | DuEE | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P | R | F1 | P | R | F1 | |
| BERT-CRF-joint | 31.0 | 22.5 | 26.1 | 42.1 | 38.3 | 40.1 |
| PLMEE | 30.4 | 28.9 | 29.6 | 42.4 | 43.2 | 42.8 |
| CasEE | 34.1 | 31.0 | 32.5 | 42.7 | 44.5 | 43.6 |
| OneEE | 35.8 | 32.4 | 34.1 | 43.1 | 44.9 | 44.0 |
| SACLEE | 34.5 | 35.8 | 36.2 | 41.9 | 44.1 | 43.6 |
| UEE | 34.7 | 35.6 | 35.2 | 42.2 | 44.3 | 44.7 |
| 本文方法 | 35.8 | 40.1 | 37.8 | 41.6 | 49.9 | 45.4 |
Tab. 4 Comparison of coarse-grained indicators of various model extractions on FewFC and DuEE datasets
| 模型 | FewFC | DuEE | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P | R | F1 | P | R | F1 | |
| BERT-CRF-joint | 31.0 | 22.5 | 26.1 | 42.1 | 38.3 | 40.1 |
| PLMEE | 30.4 | 28.9 | 29.6 | 42.4 | 43.2 | 42.8 |
| CasEE | 34.1 | 31.0 | 32.5 | 42.7 | 44.5 | 43.6 |
| OneEE | 35.8 | 32.4 | 34.1 | 43.1 | 44.9 | 44.0 |
| SACLEE | 34.5 | 35.8 | 36.2 | 41.9 | 44.1 | 43.6 |
| UEE | 34.7 | 35.6 | 35.2 | 42.2 | 44.3 | 44.7 |
| 本文方法 | 35.8 | 40.1 | 37.8 | 41.6 | 49.9 | 45.4 |
| 方法 | 重叠事件 | 触发词重叠事件 | 同类型触发词重叠事件 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AC | 事件 级别 抽取 | AC | 事件 级别 抽取 | AC | 事件 级别 抽取 | |
| BERT-CRF-joint | 58.8 | 9.2 | 54.8 | 8.5 | 49.2 | 3.8 |
| PLMEE | 62.2 | 15.4 | 64.7 | 12.7 | 51.5 | 5.5 |
| CasEE | 71.5 | 17.8 | 69.1 | 15.9 | 73.1 | 7.2 |
| UEE | 74.3 | 21.2 | 73.5 | 19.3 | 77.6 | 7.1 |
| 本文方法 | 71.6 | 27.5 | 69.3 | 25.1 | 75.5 | 27.5 |
Tab. 5 F1 scores of different complex event types on FewFC test set
| 方法 | 重叠事件 | 触发词重叠事件 | 同类型触发词重叠事件 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AC | 事件 级别 抽取 | AC | 事件 级别 抽取 | AC | 事件 级别 抽取 | |
| BERT-CRF-joint | 58.8 | 9.2 | 54.8 | 8.5 | 49.2 | 3.8 |
| PLMEE | 62.2 | 15.4 | 64.7 | 12.7 | 51.5 | 5.5 |
| CasEE | 71.5 | 17.8 | 69.1 | 15.9 | 73.1 | 7.2 |
| UEE | 74.3 | 21.2 | 73.5 | 19.3 | 77.6 | 7.1 |
| 本文方法 | 71.6 | 27.5 | 69.3 | 25.1 | 75.5 | 27.5 |
| 例子 | 对比对象 | 抽取内容 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 上下文 | 个股方面,美的集团、五粮液、海康威视买入金额居前,分别为4.58亿元、4.14亿元、2.82亿元;万科A、中国平安、洋河股份北向资金净卖出较多,净流出金额分别为2.03亿元、1.79亿元、1.04亿元。 | |
| 标注答案 | 事件一:[股份股权转让]买入 | 论元:[目标公司]美的集团;[金额]4.58亿元 | |
| 事件二:[股份股权转让]买入 | 论元:[目标公司]五粮液;[金额]4.14亿元 | ||
| 事件三:[股份股权转让]买入 | 论元:[目标公司]海康威视;[金额]2.82亿元 | ||
CasEE 结果 | 事件一:[股份股权转让]买入 | 论元:[目标公司]美的集团、五粮液海康威视万科A中国平安洋河股份;[金额]4.58亿元4.14亿元2.82亿元2.03亿元1.79亿元1.04亿元 | |
本文方法 结果 | 事件一:[股份股权转让]买入 | 论元:[目标公司]美的集团;[金额]4.58亿元 | |
| 事件二:[股份股权转让]买入 | 论元:[目标公司]五粮液;[金额]4.14亿元 | ||
| 事件三:[股份股权转让]买入 | 论元:[目标公司]海康威视;[金额]2.82亿元 | ||
| 2 | 上下文 | 18.北京ABB贝利工程有限公司天山铝业买卖合同纠纷 19.新疆宝钥钢铁有限公司天山铝业买卖合同纠纷 | |
| 标注答案 | 事件一:[判决] | 论元:[主体]北京ABB贝利工程有限公司;[客体]天山铝业;[金额]1 314 573元 | |
| 事件二:[判决] | 论元:[主体]新疆宝钥钢铁有限公司;[客体]天山铝业;[金额]1 094 137.60元 | ||
CasEE 结果 | 事件一:[判决] | 论元:[主体]北京ABB贝利工程有限公司;[客体]天山铝业;[金额]1 314 573元1 094 137.60元 | |
| 事件二:[判决] | 论元:[主体]北京ABB贝利工程有限公司新疆宝钥钢铁有限公司;[客体]天山铝业;[金额]1 314 573元1 094 137.60元 | ||
本文方法 结果 | 事件一:[判决] | 论元:[主体]北京ABB贝利工程有限公司;[客体]天山铝业;[金额]1 314 573元 | |
| 事件二:[判决] | 论元:[主体]新疆宝钥钢铁有限公司;[客体]天山铝业;[金额]1 094 137.60元 | ||
Tab. 6 Complex EE examples of different methods on FewFC test set
| 例子 | 对比对象 | 抽取内容 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 上下文 | 个股方面,美的集团、五粮液、海康威视买入金额居前,分别为4.58亿元、4.14亿元、2.82亿元;万科A、中国平安、洋河股份北向资金净卖出较多,净流出金额分别为2.03亿元、1.79亿元、1.04亿元。 | |
| 标注答案 | 事件一:[股份股权转让]买入 | 论元:[目标公司]美的集团;[金额]4.58亿元 | |
| 事件二:[股份股权转让]买入 | 论元:[目标公司]五粮液;[金额]4.14亿元 | ||
| 事件三:[股份股权转让]买入 | 论元:[目标公司]海康威视;[金额]2.82亿元 | ||
CasEE 结果 | 事件一:[股份股权转让]买入 | 论元:[目标公司]美的集团、五粮液海康威视万科A中国平安洋河股份;[金额]4.58亿元4.14亿元2.82亿元2.03亿元1.79亿元1.04亿元 | |
本文方法 结果 | 事件一:[股份股权转让]买入 | 论元:[目标公司]美的集团;[金额]4.58亿元 | |
| 事件二:[股份股权转让]买入 | 论元:[目标公司]五粮液;[金额]4.14亿元 | ||
| 事件三:[股份股权转让]买入 | 论元:[目标公司]海康威视;[金额]2.82亿元 | ||
| 2 | 上下文 | 18.北京ABB贝利工程有限公司天山铝业买卖合同纠纷 19.新疆宝钥钢铁有限公司天山铝业买卖合同纠纷 | |
| 标注答案 | 事件一:[判决] | 论元:[主体]北京ABB贝利工程有限公司;[客体]天山铝业;[金额]1 314 573元 | |
| 事件二:[判决] | 论元:[主体]新疆宝钥钢铁有限公司;[客体]天山铝业;[金额]1 094 137.60元 | ||
CasEE 结果 | 事件一:[判决] | 论元:[主体]北京ABB贝利工程有限公司;[客体]天山铝业;[金额]1 314 573元1 094 137.60元 | |
| 事件二:[判决] | 论元:[主体]北京ABB贝利工程有限公司新疆宝钥钢铁有限公司;[客体]天山铝业;[金额]1 314 573元1 094 137.60元 | ||
本文方法 结果 | 事件一:[判决] | 论元:[主体]北京ABB贝利工程有限公司;[客体]天山铝业;[金额]1 314 573元 | |
| 事件二:[判决] | 论元:[主体]新疆宝钥钢铁有限公司;[客体]天山铝业;[金额]1 094 137.60元 | ||
| [1] | LIU J, MIN L, HUANG X. An overview of event extraction and its applications[EB/OL]. [2025-03-23].. |
| [2] | 马春明,李秀红,李哲,等. 事件抽取综述[J]. 计算机应用, 2022, 42(10): 2975-2989. |
| MA C M, LI X H, LI Z, et al. Survey of event extraction[J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2022, 42(10): 2975-2989. | |
| [3] | ADNAN K, AKBAR R. An analytical study of information extraction from unstructured and multidimensional big data[J]. Journal of Big Data, 2019, 6: No.91. |
| [4] | 代建华,彭若瑶,许路,等. 基于深度神经网络的信息抽取研究综述[J]. 西南师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 47(4): 1-11. |
| DAI J H, PENG R Y, XU L, et al. A survey of information extraction based on deep neural networks[J]. Journal of Southwest University (Natural Science Edition), 2022, 47(4): 1-11. | |
| [5] | LI M, SHI X, QIAO C . et al. E2CNN: entity-type-enriched cascaded neural network for Chinese financial relation extraction[J]. Frontiers of Computer Science, 2025, 19(10): No.1910352. |
| [6] | CAO H, LI J, SU F, et al. OneEE: a one-stage framework for fast overlapping and nested event extraction[C]// Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Computational Linguistics. [S.l.]: International Committee on Computational Linguistics, 2022: 1953-1964. |
| [7] | DING N, HU C, SUN K, et al. Explicit role interaction network for event argument extraction[C]// Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2022. Stroudsburg: ACL, 2022: 3475-3485. |
| [8] | YU B, WANG Y, LIU T, et al. Maximal clique based non-autoregressive open information extraction[C]// Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Stroudsburg: ACL, 2021: 9696-9706. |
| [9] | BRON C, KERBOSCH J. Algorithm 457: finding all cliques of an undirected graph [J]. Communications of the ACM, 1973, 16(9): 575-577. |
| [10] | ZHU T, QU X, CHEN W, et al. Efficient document-level event extraction via pseudo-trigger-aware pruned complete graph[C]// Proceedings of the 31st International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. California: ijcai.org, 2022: 4552-4558. |
| [11] | WAN Q, WAN C, XIAO K, et al. Joint document-level event extraction via token-token bidirectional event completed graph[C]// Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). Stroudsburg: ACL, 2023: 10481-10492. |
| [12] | CHEN Y, XU L, LIU K, et al. Event extraction via dynamic multi-pooling convolutional neural networks[C]// Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers). Stroudsburg: ACL, 2015: 167-176. |
| [13] | RAMPONI A, VAN DER GOOT R, LOMBARDO R, et al. Biomedical event extraction as sequence labeling[C]// Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Stroudsburg: ACL, 2020: 5357-5367. |
| [14] | SHENG J, GUO S, YU B, et al. CasEE: a joint learning framework with cascade decoding for overlapping event extraction[C]// Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL-IJCNLP 2021. 2021: 164-174. |
| [15] | SHENG Z, LIANG Y, LAN Y. Improving cascade decoding with syntax-aware aggregator and contrastive learning for event extraction[C]// Proceedings of the 2023 China National Conference on Chinese Computational Linguistics, LNCS 14232. Singapore: Springer, 2023: 175-191. |
| [16] | DUAN Z, GUO Y, YAO C, et al. UEE: a unified model for event extraction[C]// Proceedings of the 2024 International Conference on Intelligent Computing, LNCS 14877. Singapore: Springer, 2024: 342-353. |
| [17] | NEWMAN M E J. Community detection and graph partitioning[J]. Europhysics Letters, 2013, 103(2): No.28003. |
| [18] | CHEN Z, JI H. Graph-based event coreference resolution[C]// Proceedings of the 2009 Workshop on Graph-based Methods for Natural Language Processing. Stroudsburg: ACL, 2009: 54-57. |
| [19] | DIESTEL R. Graph theory[M]. 6th ed. Berlin: Springer, 2025. |
| [20] | JOHNSTON H C. Cliques of a graph-variations on the Bron-Kerbosch algorithm[J]. International Journal of Computer and Information Sciences, 1976, 5(3): 209-238. |
| [21] | ZHOU Y, CHEN Y, ZHAO J, et al. What the role is vs. what plays the role: semi-supervised event argument extraction via dual question answering[C]// Proceedings of the 35th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Palo Alto: AAAI Press, 2021: 14638-14646. |
| [22] | LI X, LI F, PAN L, et al. DuEE: a large-scale dataset for Chinese event extraction in real-world scenarios[C]// Proceedings of the 2020 CCF International Conference on Natural Language Processing and Chinese Computing, LNCS 12431. Cham: Springer, 2020: 534-545. |
| [23] | RADFORD A, NARASIMHAN K, SALIMANS T, et al. Improving language understanding by generative pre-training [EB/OL]. [2025-03-23].. |
| [24] | YANG S, FENG D, QIAO L, et al. Exploring pre-trained language models for event extraction and generation[C]// Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Stroudsburg: ACL, 2019: 5284-5294. |
| [1] | Yiming HUANG, Xihua ZOU, Guo DENG, Di ZHENG. Pre-answering and retrieval filtering: dual-stage optimization method for RAG-based question-answering systems [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2026, 46(3): 696-707. |
| [2] | Wei ZHANG, Jiaxiang NIU, Jichao MA, Qiongxia SHEN. Chinese spelling correction model ReLM enhanced with deep semantic features [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2025, 45(8): 2484-2490. |
| [3] | Ziliang LI, Guangli ZHU, Yulei ZHANG, Jiajia LIU, Yixuan JIAO, Shunxiang ZHANG. Aspect-based sentiment analysis model integrating syntax and sentiment knowledge [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2025, 45(6): 1724-1731. |
| [4] | Xiaolin QIN, Xu GU, Dicheng LI, Haiwen XU. Survey and prospect of large language models [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2025, 45(3): 685-696. |
| [5] | Yuqi ZHANG, Ying SHA. Chinese semantic error recognition model based on hierarchical information enhancement [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2025, 45(12): 3771-3778. |
| [6] | Xueqiang LYU, Tao WANG, Xindong YOU, Ge XU. HTLR: named entity recognition framework with hierarchical fusion of multi-knowledge [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2025, 45(1): 40-47. |
| [7] | Qi SHUAI, Hairui WANG, Guifu ZHU. Chinese story ending generation model based on bidirectional contrastive training [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2024, 44(9): 2683-2688. |
| [8] | Quanmei ZHANG, Runping HUANG, Fei TENG, Haibo ZHANG, Nan ZHOU. Automatic international classification of disease coding method incorporating heterogeneous information [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2024, 44(8): 2476-2482. |
| [9] | Qianhui LU, Yu ZHANG, Mengling WANG, Tingwei WU, Yuzhong SHAN. Classification model of nuclear power equipment quality text based on improved recurrent pooling network [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2024, 44(7): 2034-2040. |
| [10] | Youren YU, Yangsen ZHANG, Yuru JIANG, Gaijuan HUANG. Chinese named entity recognition model incorporating multi-granularity linguistic knowledge and hierarchical information [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2024, 44(6): 1706-1712. |
| [11] | Longtao GAO, Nana LI. Aspect sentiment triplet extraction based on aspect-aware attention enhancement [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2024, 44(4): 1049-1057. |
| [12] | Xianfeng YANG, Yilei TANG, Ziqiang LI. Aspect-level sentiment analysis model based on alternating‑attention mechanism and graph convolutional network [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2024, 44(4): 1058-1064. |
| [13] | Baoshan YANG, Zhi YANG, Xingyuan CHEN, Bing HAN, Xuehui DU. Analysis of consistency between sensitive behavior and privacy policy of Android applications [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2024, 44(3): 788-796. |
| [14] | Kaitian WANG, Qing YE, Chunlei CHENG. Classification method for traditional Chinese medicine electronic medical records based on heterogeneous graph representation [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2024, 44(2): 411-417. |
| [15] | Yushan JIANG, Yangsen ZHANG. Large language model-driven stance-aware fact-checking [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2024, 44(10): 3067-3073. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||