基于双阈值约束容差优势关系的评价模型

doi:10.11772/j.issn.1001-9081.2016.11.3131

计算机应用 ›› 2016, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (11): 3131-3135.DOI: 10.11772/j.issn.1001-9081.2016.11.3131

基于双阈值约束容差优势关系的评价模型

余顺坤, 闫泓序

华北电力大学经济与管理学院, 北京 102206

收稿日期:2016-04-18 修回日期:2016-07-03 发布日期:2016-11-12 出版日期:2016-11-10
通讯作者: 闫泓序
作者简介:余顺坤(1963-),男,江苏宜兴人,教授,博士生导师,博士,主要研究方向:技术经济及管理、企业管理;闫泓序(1989-),女,吉林长春人,博士研究生,主要研究方向:管理决策、企业管理、技术经济及管理。

Evaluation model based on dual-threshold constrained tolerance dominance relation

YU Shunkun, YAN Hongxu

College of Economics and Management, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China

Received:2016-04-18 Revised:2016-07-03 Online:2016-11-12 Published:2016-11-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对序信息系统下经典优势关系粗糙集在求解优势类时对于属性值的要求过于严格，导致评价模型失效，而单阈值约束容差优势关系粗糙集对于属性个数的要求又过于宽松，造成评价结果无法容纳人的感知和判断这一问题，提出一种基于双阈值约束容差优势关系的粗糙评价模型。首先，提出双阈值约束容差优势关系的基本概念并对其相关性质予以研究；然后，基于此拓展的优势关系给出优势度的定义，并结合统计分析方法构建基于双阈值约束容差优势关系的粗糙评价模型；最后，将该模型应用于我国区域建筑业综合实力评价中，并将所得结果与原通过经典优势关系粗集法得到的排序结果进行对比分析。结果表明基于双阈值约束容差优势关系的粗糙评价模型在解决多属性决策问题方面更加合理、可靠。

关键词: 序信息系统, 阈值约束, 容差优势关系, 粗糙评价模型, 建筑业综合实力评价

Abstract: Considering the problems that classical dominance relation rough set is too strict about attribute values in solving the dominant class which may lead to the failure of the evaluation model, and single-threshold constrained tolerance dominance relation rough set was too loose about attribute number which may cause inconsistency between the evaluation results and human cognitive judgment in the ordered information system, a rough evaluation model based on dual-threshold constraint tolerance relation was proposed. Firstly, the concept of dual-threshold constrained tolerance dominance relation was proposed and its relevant properties were studied. Then, based on the extended dominance relation, the definition of dominant degree was proposed and a rough evaluation model was built by using statistical analysis method. Finally, the model was applied to the comprehensive strength evaluation of the regional building industry and the sorting results were verified in comparison with the results by using classical dominance relation rough set. According to the results, the proposed model presents more rationality and high efficiency in multi-attribute decision issues.

Key words: ordered information system, threshold limitation, tolerance dominance relation, rough evaluation model, comprehensive strength evaluation of building industry

中图分类号:

余顺坤, 闫泓序. 基于双阈值约束容差优势关系的评价模型[J]. 计算机应用, 2016, 36(11): 3131-3135.

YU Shunkun, YAN Hongxu. Evaluation model based on dual-threshold constrained tolerance dominance relation[J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2016, 36(11): 3131-3135.

参考文献

[1] PAWLAK Z. Rough sets[J]. International Journal of Computer and Information Science, 1982, 11(5):341-356.
[2] 安利平,陈增强,袁著祉.基于粗集理论的多属性决策分析[J]. 控制与决策,2005,20(3):294-298.(AN L P, CHEN Z Q, YUAN Z Z. Multi-attribute decision analysis based on rough set theory[J]. Control and Decision, 2005, 20(3):294-298.)
[3] GRECO S, MATARAZZO B, SLOWINSKI R. Rough approximation of a preference relation by dominance relations[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1999, 117(1):63-83.
[4] GRECO S, MATARAZZO B, SLOWINSKI R. Rough approximation by dominance relations[J]. International Journal of Intelligent System, 2002, 17(2):153-171.
[5] GRECO S, MATARAZZO B, SLOWINSKI R. Dominance-based rough set approach to case-based reasoning[C]//Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Modeling Decisions for Artificial Intelligence. Heidelberg:Springer-Verlag, 2006:7-18.
[6] 骆公志,杨晓江.变精度优势粗糙集属性约简择优算法[J].中国管理科学,2009,17(2):169-175.(LUO G Z, YANG X J. An algorithm to choose reduction of attributes of variable precision dominance rough sets[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2009, 17(2):169-175.)
[7] 菅利荣,刘思峰,方志耕,等.基于优势粗糙集的教学研究型大学学科建设绩效评价[J].管理工程学报,2007,21(3):132-136.(JIAN L R, LIU S F, FANG Z G, et al. The performance evaluation on discipline construction of teaching and research university based on dominance rough set theory[J]. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 2007, 21(3):132-136.)
[8] YANG X, QI Y, YU D J. α-dominance relation and rough sets in interval-valued information systems[J]. Information Sciences, 2015, 294(5):334-347.
[9] 陈万翠,吕跃进,翁世洲.基于容差优势关系的排序方法及其应用[J].计算机应用,2014,34(8):2170-2174.(CHEN W C, LYU Y J, WENG S Z. Sorting method and its application based on tolerance dominance relation[J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2014, 34(8):2170-2174.)
[10] KADZINSKI M, GRECO S, SLOWINSKI R. Robust ordinal regression for dominance-based rough set approach to multiple criteria sorting[J]. Information Sciences, 2014, 283:211-228.
[11] 戴毓,周德群.基于粗糙集理论的格序选择方法[J].中国管理科学,2007,15(6):105-110.(DAI Y, ZHOU D Q. A method of lattice-order selection based on rough sets theory[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2007, 15(6):105-110.)
[12] 徐伟华,张先韬,王巧荣.基于包含度的变精度模糊粗糙集[J].计算机科学,2011,38(9):230-233.(XU W H, ZHANG X T, WANG Q R. Variable precision fuzzy rough set based on inclusion degree[J]. Computer Science, 2011, 38(9):230-233.)
[13] 张文修,仇国芳.基于粗糙集的不确定决策[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2005:25-28.(ZHANG W X, QIU G F. Uncertain Decision Making based on Rough Set[M]. Beijing:Tsinghua University Press, 2005:25-28.)
[14] 张文修,梁怡,吴伟志.信息系统与知识发现[M].北京:科学出版社,2003:75-80.(ZHANG W X, LIANG Y, WU W Z. Information Systems and Knowledge Discovery[M]. Beijing:Science Press, 2003:75-80.)
[15] 刘贵文,邓飞,王曼.中国建筑产业竞争力评价研究[J].土木工程学报,2011,44(7):157-164.(LIU G W, DENG F, WANG M. Industrial competitiveness assessment for Chinese construction industry[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2011, 44(7):157-164.)
[16] 姜连馥,石永威,满杰.基于模糊粗糙集理论的建筑业综合评价[J].大连理工大学学报,2007,47(5):729-734.(JIANG L F, SHI Y W, MAN J. Comprehensive evaluation of building industry based on fuzzy aggregation and rough set theory[J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2007, 47(5):729-734.)

基于双阈值约束容差优势关系的评价模型

Evaluation model based on dual-threshold constrained tolerance dominance relation

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	侯阳张琼赵紫煊朱正宇张晓博. 基于YOLOv5s的复杂场景下高效烟火检测算法——YOLOv5s-MRD[J]. 《计算机应用》唯一官方网站, 0, (): 0-0.
[2]	张奇业, 曾心蕊. 带高斯核的支持向量数据描述问题的高效积极集法[J]. 《计算机应用》唯一官方网站, 2024, 44(12): 3808-3814.
[3]	曹晓意罗煦琼李景贺恩锋. 改进人工势场法下的多无人机编队路径规划方法[J]. 《计算机应用》唯一官方网站, 0, (): 0-0.
[4]	袁志超杨磊田井林魏晓威李康顺. 面向复杂约束多目标优化问题的双种群双阶段进化算法[J]. 《计算机应用》唯一官方网站, 0, (): 0-0.
[5]	冷琴, 毛政元. 考虑设施规模决策的两级选址-路径优化[J]. 《计算机应用》唯一官方网站, 2024, 44(11): 3513-3520.
[6]	彭庆媛, 王晓峰, 王军霞, 华盈盈, 唐傲, 何飞. 可满足性问题相变研究综述[J]. 《计算机应用》唯一官方网站, 2024, 44(11): 3503-3512.
[7]	孙仁科, 皇甫志宇, 陈虎, 李仲年, 许新征. 神经架构搜索综述[J]. 《计算机应用》唯一官方网站, 2024, 44(10): 2983-2994.
[8]	孙安泰, 刘烨, 徐冬梅. 多智能体系统的动态面渐近补偿算法[J]. 《计算机应用》唯一官方网站, 2024, 44(10): 3151-3157.
[9]	颜超英, 张紫仪, 曲映楠, 李秋禹, 郑地翔, 孙丽珺. 基于联盟链的双向拍卖碳交易[J]. 《计算机应用》唯一官方网站, 2024, 44(10): 3240-3245.
[10]	杨志龙邹德旋李灿邵莹莹马乐杰. 融入限制反向学习与柯西-高斯变异的蜣螂优化算法[J]. 《计算机应用》唯一官方网站, 0, (): 0-0.
[11]	姚光磊, 熊菊霞, 杨国武. 基于神经网络优化的花朵授粉算法[J]. 《计算机应用》唯一官方网站, 2024, 44(9): 2829-2837.
[12]	力尚龙, 刘建华, 贾鹤鸣. 融合多狩猎协调策略的爬行动物搜索算法[J]. 《计算机应用》唯一官方网站, 2024, 44(9): 2818-2828.
[13]	李焱, 潘大志, 郑思情. 多车场带时间窗车辆路径问题的改良自适应大邻域搜索算法[J]. 《计算机应用》唯一官方网站, 2024, 44(6): 1897-1904.
[14]	张倩婷胡丽莹陈黎飞. 时间序列的鲁棒形态表征方法[J]. 《计算机应用》唯一官方网站, 0, (): 0-0.
[15]	胡林波倪志伟程家乐刘文涛朱旭辉. 基于融合社区检测的复杂协作众包任务分配方法[J]. 《计算机应用》唯一官方网站, 0, (): 0-0.