基于形态流的石油钻井水流异常检测

doi:10.11772/j.issn.1001-9081.2020091429

计算机应用 ›› 2021, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (6): 1842-1848.DOI: 10.11772/j.issn.1001-9081.2020091429

所属专题：前沿与综合应用

• 前沿与综合应用 • 上一篇

基于形态流的石油钻井水流异常检测

李衍志, 范勇, 高琳

西南科技大学计算机科学与技术学院, 四川绵阳 621010

收稿日期:2020-09-15 修回日期:2020-11-15 出版日期:2021-06-10 发布日期:2020-11-26
通讯作者: 李衍志
作者简介:李衍志(1994-),男,四川西昌人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向:计算机视觉、视频异常事件检测、图像处理;范勇(1972-),男,重庆人,教授,博士,主要研究方向:计算机视觉、视觉测量、软件测试;高琳(1976-),男,四川绵阳人,讲师,博士,主要研究方向:计算机视觉、人工智能、模式识别。
基金资助:
四川省教育厅科技项目（18ZA0501）。

Anomaly detection of oil drilling water flow based on shape flow

LI Yanzhi, FAN Yong, GAO Lin

School of Computer Science and Technology, Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang Sichuan 621010, China

Received:2020-09-15 Revised:2020-11-15 Online:2021-06-10 Published:2020-11-26
Supported by:
This work is partially supported by the Science and Technology Project of the Education Department of Sichuan Province (18ZA0501).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对石油钻井水流的智能监控技术，可以实现石油钻井污染气体的自动监测，并最大限度地减少人工监测成本。针对现有特征提取方法不能描述水流形态变化过程，异常样本获取困难且不能完全列举，以及没有充分利用融合层信息的问题，提出了一种水流异常数据检测算法。首先，提出了一种新特征表示方法——形态流；然后，将经典的异常检测无监督神经网络GANomaly优化为残差结构；最后，在GANomaly的基础上增加了特征融合层，从而提升神经网络的学习能力。实验结果表明，改进后的算法检测精度达到了95%，相较GANomaly算法提升了5个百分点。所提算法能适用于不同场景下的水流异常数据检测，并能克服雾气对实验结果的影响。

关键词: 视频异常事件检测, 石油钻井水流异常检测, 生成对抗网络, 水流分割

Abstract: Intelligent monitoring technology for the water flow of oil drilling can realize the automatic monitoring of gaseous pollutant from oil drilling and minimize the cost of manual monitoring to the greatest extent. The existing feature extraction methods cannot describe the change process of water flow, it is difficult to obtain abnormal samples and fully enumerate them, and the fusion layer information is not fully utilized. In order to solve the problems, a new water flow abnormal data detection algorithm was proposed. Firstly, a new feature representation method named shape flow was proposed. Then, the classic anomaly detection unsupervised neural network GANomaly was optimized into a residual structure. Finally, a feature fusion layer was added to the GANomaly to improve the learning ability of neural network. Experimental results show that, the detection accuracy of the improved algorithm reaches 95%, which is 5 percentage points higher than that of the GANomaly algorithm. The proposed algorithm can be applied to the detection of abnormal water flow data in different scenarios, and can overcome the influence of fog on the experimental results.

Key words: video abnormal event detection, oil drilling water flow anomaly detection, Generative Adversarial Network (GAN), water flow segmentation

中图分类号:

TP391.4
TP18

李衍志, 范勇, 高琳. 基于形态流的石油钻井水流异常检测[J]. 计算机应用, 2021, 41(6): 1842-1848.

LI Yanzhi, FAN Yong, GAO Lin. Anomaly detection of oil drilling water flow based on shape flow[J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2021, 41(6): 1842-1848.

参考文献

[1] 刘翔宇. 石油化工工艺及其废水处理研究[J]. 石化技术,2019, 26(2):115, 117.(LIU X Y. Research on petrochemical technology and wastewater treatment[J]. Petrochemical Industry Technology, 2019,26(2):115,117.)
[2] 马兴华, 黄光利, 陶恩生. 井下废弃油井影响区域硫化氢综合治理技术研究[J]. 能源与环保, 2019, 41(12):1-4.(MA X H, HUANG G L, TAO E S. Study on comprehensive treatment technology of hydrogen sulfide in area affected by underground abandoned oil well[J]. Energy and Environmental Protection, 2019,41(12):1-4.)
[3] BROX T,MALIK J. Large displacement optical flow:descriptor matching in variational motion estimation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence,2011,33(3):500-513.
[4] UMMENHOFER B. Large displacement optical flow for volumetric image sequences[C]//Proceedings of the 2011 Joint Pattern Recognition Symposium,LNCS 6835. Berlin:Springer,2011:432-437.
[5] MIAO Y,SONG J. Abnormal event detection based on SVM in video surveillance[C]//Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE Workshop on Advanced Research and Technology in Industry Applications. Piscataway:IEEE,2014:1379-1383.
[6] KIM H,LEE S,KIM Y,et al. Weighted joint-based human behavior recognition algorithm using only depth information for lowcost intelligent video-surveillance system[J]. Expert Systems with Applications,2016,45:131-141.
[7] SABOKROU M,FAYYAZ M,FATHY M,et al. Deep-cascade:cascading 3D deep neural networks for fast anomaly detection and localization in crowded scenes[J]. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing,2017,26(4):1992-2004.
[8] LIU P,TAO Y,ZHAO W,et al. Abnormal crowd motion detection using double sparse representation[J]. Neurocomputing,2017, 269:3-12.
[9] YUAN Y,FENG Y,LU X. Structured dictionary learning for abnormal event detection in crowded scenes[J]. Pattern Recognition,2018,73:99-110.
[10] LIU W,LUO W,LIAN D,et al. Future frame prediction for anomaly detection-a new baseline[C]//Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Piscataway:IEEE,2018:6536-6545.
[11] AKCAY S, ATAPOUR-ABARGHOUEI A, BRECKON T P. GANomaly:semi-supervised anomaly detection via adversarial training[C]//Proceedings of the 2018 Asian Conference on Computer Vision, LNCS 11363. Cham:Springer, 2018:622-637.
[12] ZENATI H,FOO C S,LECOUAT B,et al. Efficient GAN-based anomaly detection[EB/OL].[2020-06-11]. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1802.06222.pdf.
[13] SCHLEGL T, SEEBÖCK P, WALDSTEIN S M, et al. Unsupervised anomaly detection with generative adversarial networks to guide marker discovery[C]//Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Information Processing in Medical Imaging,LNCS 10265. Cham:Springer,2017:146-157.
[14] CHEN L C,ZHU Y,PAPANDREOU G,et al. Encoder-decoder with atrous separable convolution for semantic image segmentation[C]//Proceedings of the 2018 European Conference on Computer Vision,LNCS 11211. Cham:Springer,2018:833-851.
[15] TSAI Y H,HUNG W C,SCHULTER S,et al. Learning to adapt structured output space for semantic segmentation[C]//Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Piscataway:IEEE,2018:7472-7481.
[16] YU C,WANG J,PENG C,et al. Learning a discriminative feature network for semantic segmentation[C]//Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Piscataway:IEEE,2018:1857-1866.
[17] RONNEBERGER O, FISCHER P, BROX T. U-Net:convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation[C]//Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-assisted Intervention,LNCS 9351. Cham:Springer,2015:234-241.
[18] CONG Y,YUAN J,TANG Y. Video anomaly search in crowded scenes via spatio-temporal motion context[J]. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security,2013,8(10):1590-1599.
[19] LONG J,SHELHAMER E,DARRELL T. Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation[C]//Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Piscataway:IEEE,2015:3431-3440.
[20] HE K,ZHANG X,REN S,et al. Deep residual learning for image recognition[C]//Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Piscataway:IEEE, 2016:770-778.
[21] IOFFE S,SZEGEDY C. Batch normalization:accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift[C]//Proceedings of the 201532nd International Conference on Machine Learning. New York:JMLR. org,2015:448-456.
[22] ZHONG J X,LI N,KONG W,et al. Graph convolutional label noise cleaner:train a plug-and-play action classifier for anomaly detection[C]//Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Piscataway:IEEE, 2019:1237-1246.
[23] SALIMANS T, GOODFELLOW I, ZAREMBA W, et al. Improved techniques for training GANs[C]//Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. Red Hook:Curran Associates Inc.,2016:2234-2242.
[24] ARJOVSKY M,CHINTALA S,BOTTOU L. Wasserstein GAN[EB/OL].[2020-06-13]. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1701.07875.pdf.
[25] ISOLA P,ZHU J Y,ZHOU T,et al. Image-to-image translation with conditional adversarial networks[C]//Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Piscataway:IEEE,2017:5967-5976.
[26] LIU F T,TING K M,ZHOU Z. Isolation forest[C]//Proceedings of the 8th IEEE International Conference on Data Mining. Piscataway:IEEE,2008:413-422.

基于形态流的石油钻井水流异常检测

Anomaly detection of oil drilling water flow based on shape flow

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	管其杰, 张挺, 李德亚, 周绍景, 杜奕. 基于多分辨率生成对抗网络的空间数据不确定性重建方法[J]. 计算机应用, 2021, 41(8): 2306-2311.
[2]	孙潇, 徐金东. 基于级联生成对抗网络的遥感图像去雾方法[J]. 计算机应用, 2021, 41(8): 2440-2444.
[3]	汤桂花, 孙磊, 毛秀青, 戴乐育, 胡永进. 基于深度对齐网络的生成对抗网络伪造人脸检测[J]. 计算机应用, 2021, 41(7): 1922-1927.
[4]	王先武, 张挺, 吉欣, 杜奕. 基于带梯度惩罚深度卷积生成对抗网络的页岩三维数字岩心重构方法[J]. 计算机应用, 2021, 41(6): 1805-1811.
[5]	井贝贝, 郭嘉, 王丽清, 陈静, 丁洪伟. 结合降噪卷积神经网络和条件生成对抗网络的图像双重盲降噪算法[J]. 计算机应用, 2021, 41(6): 1767-1774.
[6]	郭茂祖, 杨倩楠, 赵玲玲. 基于条件Wassertein生成对抗网络的图像生成[J]. 计算机应用, 2021, 41(5): 1432-1437.
[7]	孙鹤立, 孙玉柱, 张晓云. 基于生成对抗网络的事件描述生成[J]. 计算机应用, 2021, 41(5): 1256-1261.
[8]	段友祥, 张含笑, 孙歧峰, 孙友凯. 基于拉普拉斯金字塔生成对抗网络的图像超分辨率重建算法[J]. 计算机应用, 2021, 41(4): 1020-1026.
[9]	欧莉莉, 邵峰晶, 孙仁诚, 隋毅. 基于半监督方法的脑梗死图像识别[J]. 计算机应用, 2021, 41(4): 1221-1226.
[10]	李虹霞, 秦品乐, 闫寒梅, 曾建潮, 鲍骞月, 柴锐. 基于面部特征图对称的人脸正面化生成对抗网络算法[J]. 计算机应用, 2021, 41(3): 714-720.
[11]	张亚, 金鑫, 江倩, 李昕洁, 董云云, 姚绍文. 基于自动编码器的深度伪造图像检测方法[J]. 计算机应用, 2021, 41(10): 2985-2990.
[12]	邱耀儒, 孙为军, 黄永慧, 唐瑜祺, 张浩川, 吴俊鹏. 基于生成对抗网络联合时空模型的行人重识别方法[J]. 计算机应用, 2020, 40(9): 2493-2498.
[13]	张淑萍, 吴文, 万毅. 基于多阶段生成对抗网络的单幅图像阴影去除方法[J]. 计算机应用, 2020, 40(8): 2378-2385.
[14]	林静, 黄玉清, 李磊民. 基于球形矩匹配与特征判别的图像超分辨率重建[J]. 计算机应用, 2020, 40(8): 2345-2350.
[15]	陈佛计, 朱枫, 吴清潇, 郝颖明, 王恩德. 基于生成对抗网络的红外图像数据增强[J]. 计算机应用, 2020, 40(7): 2084-2088.