《计算机应用》唯一官方网站 ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (5): 1388-1396.DOI: 10.11772/j.issn.1001-9081.2025050659
• 人工智能 • 上一篇
祁晓博1,2, 张晶1, 史颖1,2,3, 亓慧1,2, 杜航原3(
)
收稿日期:2025-06-16
修回日期:2025-07-13
接受日期:2025-07-23
发布日期:2025-08-01
出版日期:2026-05-10
通讯作者:
杜航原
作者简介:祁晓博(1992—),女,山西太原人,副教授,博士,CCF会员,主要研究方向:数据挖掘、机器学习基金资助:
Xiaobo QI1,2, Jing ZHANG1, Ying SHI1,2,3, Hui QI1,2, Hangyuan DU3(
)
Received:2025-06-16
Revised:2025-07-13
Accepted:2025-07-23
Online:2025-08-01
Published:2026-05-10
Contact:
Hangyuan DU
About author:QI Xiaobo, born in 1992, Ph. D., associate professor. Her research interests include data mining, machine learning.Supported by:摘要:
数据流的实时性、无限性及动态变化特性导致数据分布具有时变性,这种随时间持续变化的现象被称为概念漂移。为检测并适应概念漂移,传统方法通常假设所有样本标签已知,但真实场景下高昂的数据标记成本使得监督学习方法代价过大,因此,主动学习方法常用于解决标签稀缺的分类任务。然而在流式环境下,概念漂移及单一标注策略等因素通常会使主动学习方法面临采样偏差。针对以上问题,提出一种基于概念漂移检测的多重主动学习方法(MALCD)。该方法设计了一种带有动态权重跳连接的在线深度神经网络模型,利用该网络模型结合弱监督漂移检测方法检测概念漂移,并融入多重采样策略,在不同样本域采用差异化策略处理。这种将多重主动学习与概念漂移检测技术相结合的方法能精准筛选不确定性高且数据类别多样的数据,高效规避冗余。在8个真实及人工数据集上的实验结果表明,MALCD的累积准确率相较于在线集成自适应分类(AC_OE)方法及弱监督概念漂移检测(WSCDD)等方法整体排名最靠前,说明该方法在漂移发生后能快速学习新概念分布,提高模型的整体泛化性能。
中图分类号:
祁晓博, 张晶, 史颖, 亓慧, 杜航原. 基于概念漂移检测的多重主动学习方法[J]. 计算机应用, 2026, 46(5): 1388-1396.
Xiaobo QI, Jing ZHANG, Ying SHI, Hui QI, Hangyuan DU. Multiple active learning method based on concept drift detection[J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2026, 46(5): 1388-1396.
| 数据集 | 实例数/103 | 属性 维数 | 样本 类别数 | 漂移 类型 | 漂移位置/103 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kddcup99 | 494 | 41 | 23 | 未知 | — |
| Electricity | 45 | 6 | 2 | 未知 | — |
| Weather | 95 | 9 | 3 | 未知 | — |
| RBFBlips | 100 | 20 | 4 | 突变型 | 25,50,75 |
| Sea | 100 | 3 | 2 | 渐变型 | 25,50,75 |
| LED_abrupt | 100 | 24 | 10 | 突变型 | 50 |
| LED_gradual | 100 | 24 | 10 | 渐变型 | 25,50,75 |
| Hyperplane | 100 | 10 | 2 | 增量型 | — |
表1 数据集信息
Tab. 1 Dataset information
| 数据集 | 实例数/103 | 属性 维数 | 样本 类别数 | 漂移 类型 | 漂移位置/103 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kddcup99 | 494 | 41 | 23 | 未知 | — |
| Electricity | 45 | 6 | 2 | 未知 | — |
| Weather | 95 | 9 | 3 | 未知 | — |
| RBFBlips | 100 | 20 | 4 | 突变型 | 25,50,75 |
| Sea | 100 | 3 | 2 | 渐变型 | 25,50,75 |
| LED_abrupt | 100 | 24 | 10 | 突变型 | 50 |
| LED_gradual | 100 | 24 | 10 | 渐变型 | 25,50,75 |
| Hyperplane | 100 | 10 | 2 | 增量型 | — |
| 数据集 | 累积准确率(排名) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UDD | Eql Retr | KSWIN | KSWIN_unl | No Det | Ran Retr | AC_OE | WSCDD | MALCD | |
| 平均排名 | 4.5 | 5.0 | 6.1 | 6.0 | 8.0 | 5.5 | 4.1 | 3.5 | 1.6 |
| Electricity | 0.710 7(6) | 0.722 0(4) | 0.704 9(7) | 0.704 9(7) | 0.685 2(9) | 0.714 3(5) | 0.792 3(1) | 0.730 4(3) | 0.751 9(2) |
| Hyperplane | 0.786 8(8) | 0.792 3(6) | 0.814 8(3) | 0.814 8(3) | 0.783 9(9) | 0.791 7(7) | 0.897 7(1) | 0.795 4(5) | 0.846 7(2) |
| Kddcup99 | 0.993 1(3) | 0.991 5(5) | 0.990 7(7) | 0.990 7(7) | 0.992 0(4) | 0.991 3(6) | 0.942 3(9) | 0.996 2(2) | 0.997 6(1) |
| LED_abrupt | 0.511 3(2) | 0.494 4(5) | 0.470 5(7) | 0.470 5(7) | 0.450 1(9) | 0.492 0(6) | 0.505 4(3) | 0.498 6(4) | 0.541 8(1) |
| LED_gradual | 0.458 8(3) | 0.412 6(5) | 0.393 2(6) | 0.386 4(7) | 0.329 4(9) | 0.422 8(4) | 0.517 9(1) | 0.374 6(8) | 0.507 0(2) |
| RBFBlips | 0.949 5(3) | 0.941 0(6) | 0.943 7(4) | 0.942 6(5) | 0.605 9(9) | 0.935 0(7) | 0.932 4(8) | 0.969 2(2) | 0.969 6(1) |
| Sea | 0.792 6(4) | 0.791 5(6) | 0.777 7(9) | 0.778 2(8) | 0.783 3(7) | 0.792 6(4) | 0.801 9(1) | 0.794 1(2) | 0.793 5(3) |
| Weather | 0.982 8(7) | 0.985 4(3) | 0.982 9(6) | 0.985 0(4) | 0.981 2(8) | 0.983 9(5) | 0.910 4(9) | 0.986 2(2) | 0.986 3(1) |
表2 不同方法的累积准确率比较
Tab. 2 Cumulative accuracy comparison of different methods
| 数据集 | 累积准确率(排名) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UDD | Eql Retr | KSWIN | KSWIN_unl | No Det | Ran Retr | AC_OE | WSCDD | MALCD | |
| 平均排名 | 4.5 | 5.0 | 6.1 | 6.0 | 8.0 | 5.5 | 4.1 | 3.5 | 1.6 |
| Electricity | 0.710 7(6) | 0.722 0(4) | 0.704 9(7) | 0.704 9(7) | 0.685 2(9) | 0.714 3(5) | 0.792 3(1) | 0.730 4(3) | 0.751 9(2) |
| Hyperplane | 0.786 8(8) | 0.792 3(6) | 0.814 8(3) | 0.814 8(3) | 0.783 9(9) | 0.791 7(7) | 0.897 7(1) | 0.795 4(5) | 0.846 7(2) |
| Kddcup99 | 0.993 1(3) | 0.991 5(5) | 0.990 7(7) | 0.990 7(7) | 0.992 0(4) | 0.991 3(6) | 0.942 3(9) | 0.996 2(2) | 0.997 6(1) |
| LED_abrupt | 0.511 3(2) | 0.494 4(5) | 0.470 5(7) | 0.470 5(7) | 0.450 1(9) | 0.492 0(6) | 0.505 4(3) | 0.498 6(4) | 0.541 8(1) |
| LED_gradual | 0.458 8(3) | 0.412 6(5) | 0.393 2(6) | 0.386 4(7) | 0.329 4(9) | 0.422 8(4) | 0.517 9(1) | 0.374 6(8) | 0.507 0(2) |
| RBFBlips | 0.949 5(3) | 0.941 0(6) | 0.943 7(4) | 0.942 6(5) | 0.605 9(9) | 0.935 0(7) | 0.932 4(8) | 0.969 2(2) | 0.969 6(1) |
| Sea | 0.792 6(4) | 0.791 5(6) | 0.777 7(9) | 0.778 2(8) | 0.783 3(7) | 0.792 6(4) | 0.801 9(1) | 0.794 1(2) | 0.793 5(3) |
| Weather | 0.982 8(7) | 0.985 4(3) | 0.982 9(6) | 0.985 0(4) | 0.981 2(8) | 0.983 9(5) | 0.910 4(9) | 0.986 2(2) | 0.986 3(1) |
| 数据集 | UDD | Eql Retr | KSWIN | KSWIN_unl | No Det | Ran Retr | WSCDD | MALCD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electricity | 0.418 5 | 0.443 9 | 0.408 2 | 0.408 2 | 0.404 8 | 0.437 2 | 0.452 8 | 0.516 4 |
| Hyperplane | 0.563 1 | 0.570 9 | 0.582 6 | 0.582 6 | 0.557 7 | 0.570 7 | 0.571 0 | 0.605 8 |
| Kddcup99 | 0.984 3 | 0.984 3 | 0.984 2 | 0.984 2 | 0.984 4 | 0.984 2 | 0.990 0 | 0.991 6 |
| LED_abrupt | 0.457 3 | 0.438 7 | 0.413 0 | 0.413 0 | 0.389 9 | 0.433 3 | 0.443 0 | 0.483 7 |
| LED_gradual | 0.398 9 | 0.344 9 | 0.324 9 | 0.318 9 | 0.255 7 | 0.359 7 | 0.315 5 | 0.453 0 |
| RBFBlips | 0.935 6 | 0.926 9 | 0.929 5 | 0.923 8 | 0.477 8 | 0.920 2 | 0.958 4 | 0.959 9 |
| Sea | 0.564 6 | 0.561 0 | 0.554 1 | 0.552 6 | 0.564 0 | 0.564 6 | 0.566 2 | 0.566 0 |
| Weather | 0.912 7 | 0.918 5 | 0.908 8 | 0.913 2 | 0.903 6 | 0.925 3 | 0.926 3 | 0.930 8 |
表3 不同方法的MCC对比
Tab. 3 MCC comparison of different methods
| 数据集 | UDD | Eql Retr | KSWIN | KSWIN_unl | No Det | Ran Retr | WSCDD | MALCD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electricity | 0.418 5 | 0.443 9 | 0.408 2 | 0.408 2 | 0.404 8 | 0.437 2 | 0.452 8 | 0.516 4 |
| Hyperplane | 0.563 1 | 0.570 9 | 0.582 6 | 0.582 6 | 0.557 7 | 0.570 7 | 0.571 0 | 0.605 8 |
| Kddcup99 | 0.984 3 | 0.984 3 | 0.984 2 | 0.984 2 | 0.984 4 | 0.984 2 | 0.990 0 | 0.991 6 |
| LED_abrupt | 0.457 3 | 0.438 7 | 0.413 0 | 0.413 0 | 0.389 9 | 0.433 3 | 0.443 0 | 0.483 7 |
| LED_gradual | 0.398 9 | 0.344 9 | 0.324 9 | 0.318 9 | 0.255 7 | 0.359 7 | 0.315 5 | 0.453 0 |
| RBFBlips | 0.935 6 | 0.926 9 | 0.929 5 | 0.923 8 | 0.477 8 | 0.920 2 | 0.958 4 | 0.959 9 |
| Sea | 0.564 6 | 0.561 0 | 0.554 1 | 0.552 6 | 0.564 0 | 0.564 6 | 0.566 2 | 0.566 0 |
| Weather | 0.912 7 | 0.918 5 | 0.908 8 | 0.913 2 | 0.903 6 | 0.925 3 | 0.926 3 | 0.930 8 |
| 数据集 | HBP | HBP+Dropout | MALCD(HBP+Dropout+动态跳连接) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cumacc | MCC | AUC | Cumacc | MCC | AUC | Cumacc | MCC | AUC | |
| Electricity | 0.744 1 | 0.493 4 | 0.810 4 | 0.748 4 | 0.507 8 | 0.817 5 | 0.751 9 | 0.516 4 | 0.826 4 |
| Hyperplane | 0.806 0 | 0.581 2 | 0.867 3 | 0.833 4 | 0.590 2 | 0.869 3 | 0.846 7 | 0.605 8 | 0.874 9 |
| Kddcup99 | 0.988 6 | 0.987 7 | 0.963 4 | 0.996 1 | 0.990 3 | 0.969 9 | 0.997 6 | 0.991 6 | 0.971 3 |
| LED_abrupt | 0.486 1 | 0.412 5 | 0.828 5 | 0.501 6 | 0.444 3 | 0.861 9 | 0.541 8 | 0.483 7 | 0.889 4 |
| LED_gradual | 0.467 2 | 0.401 4 | 0.838 9 | 0.472 1 | 0.424 4 | 0.846 5 | 0.507 0 | 0.453 0 | 0.851 2 |
| RBFBlips | 0.965 0 | 0.950 1 | 0.995 6 | 0.960 2 | 0.947 4 | 0.993 7 | 0.969 6 | 0.959 9 | 0.997 4 |
| Sea | 0.791 8 | 0.543 6 | 0.815 3 | 0.792 9 | 0.555 7 | 0.816 8 | 0.793 5 | 0.566 0 | 0.817 5 |
| Weather | 0.982 3 | 0.913 5 | 0.729 6 | 0.982 7 | 0.916 5 | 0.745 3 | 0.986 3 | 0.930 8 | 0.746 9 |
表4 消融实验结果
Tab. 4 Ablation experimental results
| 数据集 | HBP | HBP+Dropout | MALCD(HBP+Dropout+动态跳连接) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cumacc | MCC | AUC | Cumacc | MCC | AUC | Cumacc | MCC | AUC | |
| Electricity | 0.744 1 | 0.493 4 | 0.810 4 | 0.748 4 | 0.507 8 | 0.817 5 | 0.751 9 | 0.516 4 | 0.826 4 |
| Hyperplane | 0.806 0 | 0.581 2 | 0.867 3 | 0.833 4 | 0.590 2 | 0.869 3 | 0.846 7 | 0.605 8 | 0.874 9 |
| Kddcup99 | 0.988 6 | 0.987 7 | 0.963 4 | 0.996 1 | 0.990 3 | 0.969 9 | 0.997 6 | 0.991 6 | 0.971 3 |
| LED_abrupt | 0.486 1 | 0.412 5 | 0.828 5 | 0.501 6 | 0.444 3 | 0.861 9 | 0.541 8 | 0.483 7 | 0.889 4 |
| LED_gradual | 0.467 2 | 0.401 4 | 0.838 9 | 0.472 1 | 0.424 4 | 0.846 5 | 0.507 0 | 0.453 0 | 0.851 2 |
| RBFBlips | 0.965 0 | 0.950 1 | 0.995 6 | 0.960 2 | 0.947 4 | 0.993 7 | 0.969 6 | 0.959 9 | 0.997 4 |
| Sea | 0.791 8 | 0.543 6 | 0.815 3 | 0.792 9 | 0.555 7 | 0.816 8 | 0.793 5 | 0.566 0 | 0.817 5 |
| Weather | 0.982 3 | 0.913 5 | 0.729 6 | 0.982 7 | 0.916 5 | 0.745 3 | 0.986 3 | 0.930 8 | 0.746 9 |
| [1] | GAMA J, GANGULY A, OMITAOMU O, et al. Knowledge discovery from data streams[J]. Intelligent Data Analysis, 2009, 13(3): 403-404. |
| [2] | BIFET A, HOLMES G, PFAHRINGER B, et al. New ensemble methods for evolving data streams[C]// Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. New York: ACM, 2009: 139-148. |
| [3] | 文益民,刘帅,缪裕青,等. 概念漂移数据流半监督分类综述[J]. 软件学报, 2022, 33(4): 1287-1314. |
| WEN Y M, LIU S, MIAO Y Q, et al. Survey on semi-supervised classification of data streams with concept drifts[J]. Journal of Software, 2022, 33(4): 1287-1314. | |
| [4] | WEBB G L, HYDE R, CAO H, et al. Characterizing concept drift[J]. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 2016, 30(4): 964-994. |
| [5] | KHAMASSI I, SAYED-MOUCHAWEH M, HAMMAMI M, et al. Discussion and review on evolving data streams and concept drift adapting[J]. Evolving Systems, 2018, 9(1): 1-23. |
| [6] | LU J, LIU A, DONG F, et al. Learning under concept drift: a review[J]. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2019, 31(12): 2346-2363. |
| [7] | LU J, LIU A, SONG Y, et al. Data-driven decision support under concept drift in streamed big data[J]. Complex and Intelligent Systems, 2020, 6(1): 157-163. |
| [8] | 孙艳歌,王志海,白洋. 一种面向不平衡数据流的集成分类算法[J]. 小型微型计算机系统, 2018, 39(6): 1178-1183. |
| SUN Y G, WANG Z H, BAI Y. Ensemble classifier for mining imbalanced data streams[J]. Journal of Chinese Computer Systems, 2018, 39(6): 1178-1183. | |
| [9] | SUÁREZ-CETRULO A L, QUINTANA D, CERVANTES A. A survey on machine learning for recurring concept drifting data streams[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2023, 213(Pt A): No.118934. |
| [10] | YU H, LIU W, LU J, et al. Detecting group concept drift from multiple data streams[J]. Pattern Recognition, 2023, 134: No.109113. |
| [11] | SHAHRAKI A, ABBASI, M, TAHERKORDI, A, et al. Active learning for network traffic classification: a technical study[J]. IEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networking, 2022, 8(1): 422-439. |
| [12] | 柴变芳,吕峰,李文斌,等.基于主动学习先验的半监督K‑means聚类算法[J].计算机应用,2018,38(11):3139-3143. |
| CHAI B F, LYU F, LI W B, et al. Semi-supervised K-means clustering algorithm based on active learning priors[J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2018, 38(11): 3139-3143. | |
| [13] | 刘康,钱旭,王自强.主动学习算法综述[J].计算机工程与应用,2012,48(34):1-4, 22. |
| LIU K, QIAN X, WANG Z Q. Survey on active learning algorithms[J]. Computer Engineering and Applications, 2012, 48(34): 1-4, 22. | |
| [14] | KARIMIAN M, BEIGY H. Concept drift handling: a domain adaptation perspective[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2023, 224: No.119946. |
| [15] | DOMINGOS P, HULTEN G. Mining high-speed data streams[C]// Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. New York: ACM, 2000: 71-80. |
| [16] | BAYRAM F, AHMED B S, KASSLER A. From concept drift to model degradation: an overview on performance-aware drift detectors[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2022, 245: No.108632. |
| [17] | YANG L, SHAMI A. A lightweight concept drift detection and adaptation framework for IoT data streams[J]. IEEE Internet of Things Magazine, 2021, 4(2): 96-101. |
| [18] | GAMA J, MEDAS P, CASTILLO G, et al. Learning with drift detection[C]// Proceedings of the 2004 Brazilian Symposium on Artificial Intelligence, LNCS 3171. Berlin: Springer, 2004: 286-295. |
| [19] | LIU A, LU J, ZHANG G. Diverse instance-weighting ensemble based on region drift disagreement for concept drift adaptation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 2021, 32(1): 293-307. |
| [20] | BIFET A, GAVALDÀ R. Learning from time-changing data with adaptive windowing[C]// Proceedings of the 7th SIAM International Conference on Data Mining. Philadelphia, PA: SIAM, 2009: 443-448. |
| [21] | 马乾骏,郭虎升,王文剑. 在线深度神经网络的弱监督概念漂移检测方法[J]. 小型微型计算机系统, 2024, 45(9): 2094-2101. |
| MA Q J, GUO H S, WANG W J. Weakly supervised concept drift detection method for online deep neural networks[J]. Journal of Chinese Computer Systems, 2024, 45(9): 2094-2101. | |
| [22] | DE ROSA R, CESA-BIANCHI N. Confidence decision trees via online and active learning for streaming data[J]. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 2017, 60: 1031-1055. |
| [23] | FAHY C, YANG S, GONGORA M. Scarcity of labels in non-stationary data streams: a survey[J]. ACM Computing Surveys, 2023, 55(2): No.40. |
| [24] | 李京阳,刘三民,张匡燕. 基于三支决策的数据流主动学习分类研究[J]. 天津理工大学学报, 2023, 39(3): 21-26. |
| LI J Y, LIU S M, ZHANG K Y. Research on active learning classification of data stream based on three-way decision[J]. Journal of Tianjin University of Technology, 2023, 39(3): 21-26. | |
| [25] | ZGRAJA J, GAMA J, WOŹNIAK M. Active learning by clustering for drifted data stream classification[C]// Proceedings of the 2018 European Conference on Machine Learning and Principles and Practice of Knowledge Discovery in Databases Workshops, CCIS 967. Dublin: Springer, 2019: 80-90. |
| [26] | LI X, LV J, YI Z. An efficient representation-based method for boundary point and outlier detection[J]. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 2018, 29(1): 51-62. |
| [27] | LIU S, XUE S, WU J, et al. Online active learning for drifting data streams[J]. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 2023, 34(1): 186-200. |
| [28] | GUI X, LU X, YU G. Cost-effective batch-mode multi-label active learning[J]. Neurocomputing, 2021, 463: 355-367. |
| [29] | 张银芳,于洪,王国胤,等. 一种用于数据流自适应分类的主动学习方法[J]. 南京大学学报(自然科学), 2020, 56(1): 67-73. |
| ZHANG Y F, YU H, WANG G Y, et al. An active learning method for data stream adaptive classification[J]. Journal of Nanjing University (Natural Science), 2020, 56(1): 67-73. | |
| [30] | STANLEY K O. Learning concept drift with a committee of decision trees: UT-AI-TR-03-302[R/OL]. [2025-04-21].. |
| [31] | SAHOO D, PHAM Q, LU J, et al. Online deep learning: learning deep neural networks on the fly[C]// Proceedings of the 27th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. California: ijcai.org, 2018: 2660-2666. |
| [32] | KREUZBERGER D, KÜHL N, HIRSCHL S. Machine Learning Operations (MLOps): overview, definition, and architecture[J]. IEEE Access, 2023, 11: 31866-31879. |
| [33] | TOGBE M U, CHABCHOUB Y, BOLY A, et al. Anomalies detection using isolation in concept-drifting data streams[J]. Computers, 2021, 10(1): No.13. |
| [34] | 郭虎升,丛璐,高淑花,等. 基于在线集成的概念漂移自适应分类方法[J]. 计算机研究与发展, 2023, 60(7): 1592-1602. |
| GUO H S, CONG L, GAO S H, et al. Adaptive classification method for concept drift based on online ensemble[J]. Journal of Computer Research and Development, 2023, 60(7): 1592-1602. | |
| [35] | PEREIRA D, AFONSO A, MEDEIROS F M. Overview of Friedman’s test and post-hoc analysis[J]. Communications in Statistics — Simulation and Computation, 2015, 44(10): 2636-2653. |
| [36] | DEMŠAR J. Statistical comparisons of classifiers over multiple data sets[J]. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2006, 7: 1-30. |
| [1] | 齐巧玲, 王啸啸, 张茜茜, 汪鹏, 董永峰. 基于元学习的标签噪声自适应学习算法[J]. 《计算机应用》唯一官方网站, 2025, 45(7): 2113-2122. |
| [2] | 王慧斌, 胡展傲, 胡节, 徐袁伟, 文博. 基于分段注意力机制的时间序列预测模型[J]. 《计算机应用》唯一官方网站, 2025, 45(7): 2262-2268. |
| [3] | 向尔康, 黄荣, 董爱华. 开放生成与特征优化的开集识别方法[J]. 《计算机应用》唯一官方网站, 2025, 45(7): 2195-2202. |
| [4] | 陈路, 王怀瑶, 刘京阳, 闫涛, 陈斌. 融合空间-傅里叶域信息的机器人低光环境抓取检测[J]. 《计算机应用》唯一官方网站, 2025, 45(5): 1686-1693. |
| [5] | 王华华, 范子健, 刘泽. 基于多空间概率增强的图像对抗样本生成方法[J]. 《计算机应用》唯一官方网站, 2025, 45(3): 883-890. |
| [6] | 杨晟, 李岩. 面向目标检测的对比知识蒸馏方法[J]. 《计算机应用》唯一官方网站, 2025, 45(2): 354-361. |
| [7] | 杨本臣, 李浩然, 金海波. 级联融合与增强重建的多聚焦图像融合网络[J]. 《计算机应用》唯一官方网站, 2025, 45(2): 594-600. |
| [8] | 段新涛, 保梦茹, 武银行, 秦川. 基于四维Chen混沌系统的深度神经网络模型主动保护方法[J]. 《计算机应用》唯一官方网站, 2025, 45(11): 3621-3631. |
| [9] | 石锐, 李勇, 朱延晗. 基于特征梯度均值化的调制信号对抗样本攻击算法[J]. 《计算机应用》唯一官方网站, 2024, 44(8): 2521-2527. |
| [10] | 王美, 苏雪松, 刘佳, 殷若南, 黄珊. 时频域多尺度交叉注意力融合的时间序列分类方法[J]. 《计算机应用》唯一官方网站, 2024, 44(6): 1842-1847. |
| [11] | 孟凡, 杨群力, 霍静, 王新宽. 基于边缘异常候选集的迭代式主动多元时序异常检测算法[J]. 《计算机应用》唯一官方网站, 2024, 44(5): 1458-1463. |
| [12] | 肖斌, 杨模, 汪敏, 秦光源, 李欢. 独立性视角下的相频融合领域泛化方法[J]. 《计算机应用》唯一官方网站, 2024, 44(4): 1002-1009. |
| [13] | 颜梦玫, 杨冬平. 深度神经网络平均场理论综述[J]. 《计算机应用》唯一官方网站, 2024, 44(2): 331-343. |
| [14] | 张明, 付乐, 王海峰. 面向边缘计算的并发数据流接转控制模型[J]. 《计算机应用》唯一官方网站, 2024, 44(12): 3876-3883. |
| [15] | 柴汶泽, 范菁, 孙书魁, 梁一鸣, 刘竟锋. 深度度量学习综述[J]. 《计算机应用》唯一官方网站, 2024, 44(10): 2995-3010. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||