Journal of Computer Applications ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (5): 1647-1657.DOI: 10.11772/j.issn.1001-9081.2025050568
• Frontier and comprehensive applications • Previous Articles
Wen PENG1, Bokai ZHANG1(
), Jinwei LIN2
Received:2025-05-22
Revised:2025-07-23
Accepted:2025-08-11
Online:2025-08-20
Published:2026-05-10
Contact:
Bokai ZHANG
About author:PENG Wen, born in 1980, Ph. D., associate professor. His research interests include medical image analysis, artificial intelligence.通讯作者:
张博凯
作者简介:彭文(1980—),男,内蒙古赤峰人,副教授,博士,CCF会员,主要研究方向:医学影像分析、人工智能CLC Number:
Wen PENG, Bokai ZHANG, Jinwei LIN. Chromosome cascaded classification framework integrating image texture enhancement and super-resolution[J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2026, 46(5): 1647-1657.
彭文, 张博凯, 林金炜. 融合图像纹理增强与超分辨率的染色体级联分类框架[J]. 《计算机应用》唯一官方网站, 2026, 46(5): 1647-1657.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.joca.cn/EN/10.11772/j.issn.1001-9081.2025050568
| 分类任务 | 长染色体数 | 短小染色体数 | 总数 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 染色体粗分类 | 31 773 | 14 590 | 46 363 |
| 长染色体细分类 | 31 773 | 31 773 | |
| 短小染色体细分类 | 45 931 | 45 931 | |
| 染色体分类 | 31 773 | 14 590 | 46 363 |
Tab. 1 Chromosome distribution of Dataset1 in various classification tasks
| 分类任务 | 长染色体数 | 短小染色体数 | 总数 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 染色体粗分类 | 31 773 | 14 590 | 46 363 |
| 长染色体细分类 | 31 773 | 31 773 | |
| 短小染色体细分类 | 45 931 | 45 931 | |
| 染色体分类 | 31 773 | 14 590 | 46 363 |
| 方法 | Acc | P | R | F1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SwinTransformer-small | 98.81 | 98.58 | 98.66 | 98.62 |
| ResNet18 | 99.13 | 99.18 | 98.81 | 98.99 |
| Inception-ResNetV2 | 99.24 | 99.45 | 98.80 | 99.12 |
| SIATE-Net | 99.33 | 99.31 | 99.09 | 99.20 |
| ResNet50 | 99.57 | 99.59 | 99.41 | 99.50 |
| EfficientNet-B4 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
Tab. 2 Performance comparison of different models for coarse chromosome classification
| 方法 | Acc | P | R | F1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SwinTransformer-small | 98.81 | 98.58 | 98.66 | 98.62 |
| ResNet18 | 99.13 | 99.18 | 98.81 | 98.99 |
| Inception-ResNetV2 | 99.24 | 99.45 | 98.80 | 99.12 |
| SIATE-Net | 99.33 | 99.31 | 99.09 | 99.20 |
| ResNet50 | 99.57 | 99.59 | 99.41 | 99.50 |
| EfficientNet-B4 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| 方法 | Acc | P | R | F1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EfficientNet-B4 | 98.89 | 98.95 | 98.67 | 98.77 |
| FEM-EfficientNet-B4 | 99.05 | 99.03 | 99.00 | 99.01 |
Tab. 3 Performance comparison of models for fine classification of long chromosomes
| 方法 | Acc | P | R | F1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EfficientNet-B4 | 98.89 | 98.95 | 98.67 | 98.77 |
| FEM-EfficientNet-B4 | 99.05 | 99.03 | 99.00 | 99.01 |
| 方法 | Acc | P | R | F1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EfficientNet-B4 | 90.72 | 91.75 | 89.09 | 90.05 |
| SIATE-Net | 95.17 | 94.77 | 94.69 | 94.68 |
| CATE-Net | 95.88 | 96.37 | 95.43 | 95.82 |
Tab. 4 Performance comparison of models for fine classification of short chromosomes
| 方法 | Acc | P | R | F1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EfficientNet-B4 | 90.72 | 91.75 | 89.09 | 90.05 |
| SIATE-Net | 95.17 | 94.77 | 94.69 | 94.68 |
| CATE-Net | 95.88 | 96.37 | 95.43 | 95.82 |
| 预处理方法 | PSNR/dB | SSIM | Acc/% | P/% | R/% | F1/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 原始图像 | 95.88 | 96.37 | 95.43 | 95.82 | ||
| Bicubic | 39.24 | 0.991 43 | 96.18 | 95.59 | 96.56 | 95.98 |
| SRCNN | 53.35 | 0.993 15 | 96.55 | 96.06 | 96.88 | 96.43 |
| SRGAN | 56.74 | 0.993 84 | 97.59 | 97.89 | 95.94 | 96.75 |
| LapSRN | 59.53 | 0.999 95 | 97.92 | 97.34 | 98.12 | 97.68 |
| EDSR | 61.15 | 0.999 96 | 98.28 | 97.52 | 97.50 | 97.50 |
| LBNet | 62.67 | 0.999 85 | 98.62 | 97.95 | 98.75 | 98.31 |
Tab. 5 Performance comparison of super-resolution methods
| 预处理方法 | PSNR/dB | SSIM | Acc/% | P/% | R/% | F1/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 原始图像 | 95.88 | 96.37 | 95.43 | 95.82 | ||
| Bicubic | 39.24 | 0.991 43 | 96.18 | 95.59 | 96.56 | 95.98 |
| SRCNN | 53.35 | 0.993 15 | 96.55 | 96.06 | 96.88 | 96.43 |
| SRGAN | 56.74 | 0.993 84 | 97.59 | 97.89 | 95.94 | 96.75 |
| LapSRN | 59.53 | 0.999 95 | 97.92 | 97.34 | 98.12 | 97.68 |
| EDSR | 61.15 | 0.999 96 | 98.28 | 97.52 | 97.50 | 97.50 |
| LBNet | 62.67 | 0.999 85 | 98.62 | 97.95 | 98.75 | 98.31 |
| 任务 | 方法 | Acc | P | R | F1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
染色体 粗分类 | EfficientNet-B4 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
长染色体 细分类 | FEM-EfficientNet-B4 | 99.05 | 99.03 | 99.00 | 99.01 |
短小染色体 细分类 | LBNet+CATE-Net | 98.62 | 97.95 | 98.75 | 98.31 |
| 染色体分类 | 本文框架 | 98.91 | 98.67 | 98.92 | 98.77 |
Tab. 6 Classification performance of subtasks of chromosome classification on Dataset1
| 任务 | 方法 | Acc | P | R | F1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
染色体 粗分类 | EfficientNet-B4 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
长染色体 细分类 | FEM-EfficientNet-B4 | 99.05 | 99.03 | 99.00 | 99.01 |
短小染色体 细分类 | LBNet+CATE-Net | 98.62 | 97.95 | 98.75 | 98.31 |
| 染色体分类 | 本文框架 | 98.91 | 98.67 | 98.92 | 98.77 |
| 模型 | Acc | P | R | F1 | F1_L | F1_S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VGG | 89.99 | 89.96 | 90.11 | 89.95 | 92.60 | 87.11 |
| ResNet | 95.18 | 95.34 | 95.01 | 95.12 | 96.95 | 92.31 |
| DenseNet | 95.94 | 95.88 | 96.13 | 95.99 | 97.18 | 94.11 |
| Vision Transformer | 97.07 | 97.11 | 97.11 | 97.04 | 97.95 | 96.62 |
| VAN | 97.50 | 97.63 | 97.44 | 97.58 | 98.26 | 96.78 |
| CIR-Net | 96.52 | 96.10 | 96.77 | 96.47 | 98.03 | 93.59 |
| SIATE-Net | 98.04 | 98.08 | 97.71 | 97.90 | 98.33 | 97.42 |
| 本文框架 | 98.91 | 98.67 | 98.92 | 98.77 | 99.01 | 98.31 |
Tab. 7 Performance comparison of different classification models on Dataset1
| 模型 | Acc | P | R | F1 | F1_L | F1_S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VGG | 89.99 | 89.96 | 90.11 | 89.95 | 92.60 | 87.11 |
| ResNet | 95.18 | 95.34 | 95.01 | 95.12 | 96.95 | 92.31 |
| DenseNet | 95.94 | 95.88 | 96.13 | 95.99 | 97.18 | 94.11 |
| Vision Transformer | 97.07 | 97.11 | 97.11 | 97.04 | 97.95 | 96.62 |
| VAN | 97.50 | 97.63 | 97.44 | 97.58 | 98.26 | 96.78 |
| CIR-Net | 96.52 | 96.10 | 96.77 | 96.47 | 98.03 | 93.59 |
| SIATE-Net | 98.04 | 98.08 | 97.71 | 97.90 | 98.33 | 97.42 |
| 本文框架 | 98.91 | 98.67 | 98.92 | 98.77 | 99.01 | 98.31 |
| 任务 | 方法 | Acc | P | R | F1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
染色体 粗分类 | EfficientNet-B4 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
长染色体 细分类 | FEM-EfficientNet-B4 | 99.51 | 99.54 | 99.45 | 99.48 |
短小染色体 细分类 | LBNet+CATE-Net | 98.94 | 99.11 | 99.04 | 99.05 |
| 染色体分类 | 本文框架 | 99.33 | 99.39 | 99.31 | 99.34 |
Tab. 8 Classification performance of subtasks of chromosome classification on Dataset2
| 任务 | 方法 | Acc | P | R | F1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
染色体 粗分类 | EfficientNet-B4 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
长染色体 细分类 | FEM-EfficientNet-B4 | 99.51 | 99.54 | 99.45 | 99.48 |
短小染色体 细分类 | LBNet+CATE-Net | 98.94 | 99.11 | 99.04 | 99.05 |
| 染色体分类 | 本文框架 | 99.33 | 99.39 | 99.31 | 99.34 |
| 模型 | Acc | P | R | F1 | F1_L | F1_S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VGG | 92.58 | 91.91 | 92.17 | 92.23 | 93.27 | 91.31 |
| ResNet | 94.77 | 93.95 | 94.62 | 93.70 | 95.69 | 92.97 |
| DenseNet | 95.85 | 95.60 | 94.47 | 94.55 | 96.76 | 93.44 |
| Vision Transformer | 97.96 | 97.84 | 97.36 | 97.97 | 98.63 | 94.93 |
| VAN | 98.55 | 98.71 | 98.54 | 98.60 | 98.96 | 98.27 |
| CIR-Net | 96.12 | 95.87 | 96.15 | 96.03 | 97.25 | 94.08 |
| SIATE-Net | 98.95 | 98.60 | 98.84 | 98.84 | 99.27 | 98.51 |
| 本文框架 | 99.33 | 99.39 | 99.31 | 99.34 | 99.48 | 99.05 |
Tab. 9 Performance comparison of different classification models on Dataset2
| 模型 | Acc | P | R | F1 | F1_L | F1_S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VGG | 92.58 | 91.91 | 92.17 | 92.23 | 93.27 | 91.31 |
| ResNet | 94.77 | 93.95 | 94.62 | 93.70 | 95.69 | 92.97 |
| DenseNet | 95.85 | 95.60 | 94.47 | 94.55 | 96.76 | 93.44 |
| Vision Transformer | 97.96 | 97.84 | 97.36 | 97.97 | 98.63 | 94.93 |
| VAN | 98.55 | 98.71 | 98.54 | 98.60 | 98.96 | 98.27 |
| CIR-Net | 96.12 | 95.87 | 96.15 | 96.03 | 97.25 | 94.08 |
| SIATE-Net | 98.95 | 98.60 | 98.84 | 98.84 | 99.27 | 98.51 |
| 本文框架 | 99.33 | 99.39 | 99.31 | 99.34 | 99.48 | 99.05 |
| Class(i) | Dataset1 | Dataset2 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acci | Pi | Ri | F1i | Acci | Pi | Ri | F1i | |
| 1 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| 2 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| 3 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| 4 | 100.00 | 97.56 | 100.00 | 98.77 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| 5 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| 6 | 97.50 | 100.00 | 97.50 | 98.73 | 96.15 | 100.00 | 96.15 | 98.04 |
| 7 | 100.00 | 97.56 | 100.00 | 98.77 | 100.00 | 96.30 | 100.00 | 98.11 |
| 8 | 97.50 | 100.00 | 97.50 | 98.73 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| 9 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| 10 | 100.00 | 95.24 | 100.00 | 97.56 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| 11 | 97.50 | 97.50 | 97.50 | 97.50 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| 12 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| 13 | 97.50 | 100.00 | 97.50 | 98.73 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| 14 | 97.50 | 100.00 | 97.50 | 98.73 | 100.00 | 96.30 | 100.00 | 98.11 |
| 15 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| 16 | 97.50 | 95.12 | 97.50 | 96.30 | 96.15 | 100.00 | 96.15 | 98.04 |
| 17 | 97.50 | 100.00 | 97.50 | 98.73 | 96.15 | 100.00 | 96.15 | 98.04 |
| 18 | 97.50 | 100.00 | 97.50 | 98.73 | 100.00 | 96.30 | 100.00 | 98.11 |
| 19 | 100.00 | 97.56 | 100.00 | 98.77 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| 20 | 97.50 | 100.00 | 97.50 | 98.73 | 100.00 | 92.86 | 100.00 | 96.30 |
| 21 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| 22 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 96.15 | 100.00 | 96.15 | 98.04 |
| X | 96.55 | 96.55 | 96.55 | 96.55 | 95.00 | 100.00 | 95.00 | 97.44 |
| Y | 100.00 | 90.91 | 100.00 | 95.45 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
Tab. 10 Classification performance of chromosome classification framework on Dataset1 and Dataset2
| Class(i) | Dataset1 | Dataset2 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acci | Pi | Ri | F1i | Acci | Pi | Ri | F1i | |
| 1 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| 2 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| 3 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| 4 | 100.00 | 97.56 | 100.00 | 98.77 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| 5 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| 6 | 97.50 | 100.00 | 97.50 | 98.73 | 96.15 | 100.00 | 96.15 | 98.04 |
| 7 | 100.00 | 97.56 | 100.00 | 98.77 | 100.00 | 96.30 | 100.00 | 98.11 |
| 8 | 97.50 | 100.00 | 97.50 | 98.73 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| 9 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| 10 | 100.00 | 95.24 | 100.00 | 97.56 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| 11 | 97.50 | 97.50 | 97.50 | 97.50 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| 12 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| 13 | 97.50 | 100.00 | 97.50 | 98.73 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| 14 | 97.50 | 100.00 | 97.50 | 98.73 | 100.00 | 96.30 | 100.00 | 98.11 |
| 15 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| 16 | 97.50 | 95.12 | 97.50 | 96.30 | 96.15 | 100.00 | 96.15 | 98.04 |
| 17 | 97.50 | 100.00 | 97.50 | 98.73 | 96.15 | 100.00 | 96.15 | 98.04 |
| 18 | 97.50 | 100.00 | 97.50 | 98.73 | 100.00 | 96.30 | 100.00 | 98.11 |
| 19 | 100.00 | 97.56 | 100.00 | 98.77 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| 20 | 97.50 | 100.00 | 97.50 | 98.73 | 100.00 | 92.86 | 100.00 | 96.30 |
| 21 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| 22 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 96.15 | 100.00 | 96.15 | 98.04 |
| X | 96.55 | 96.55 | 96.55 | 96.55 | 95.00 | 100.00 | 95.00 | 97.44 |
| Y | 100.00 | 90.91 | 100.00 | 95.45 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| 任务 | 方法 | 参数量/106 | GFLOPs | 推理 时间/s | 平均F1/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
染色体 粗分类 | EfficientNet-B4 | 17.56 | 173.77 | 0.034 6 | 100.00 |
长染色体 细分类 | FEM-EfficientNet-B4 | 17.56 | 173.86 | 0.038 0 | 99.25 |
短小染色体 细分类 | LBNet | 0.73 | 58.54 | 0.039 5 | |
| CATE-Net | 26.09 | 30.20 | 0.012 0 | 98.68 | |
| 染色体分类 | 本文框架 | 61.97 | 323.04 | 0.076 9 | 99.10 |
Tab. 11 Model complexity of subtasks of chromosome classification
| 任务 | 方法 | 参数量/106 | GFLOPs | 推理 时间/s | 平均F1/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
染色体 粗分类 | EfficientNet-B4 | 17.56 | 173.77 | 0.034 6 | 100.00 |
长染色体 细分类 | FEM-EfficientNet-B4 | 17.56 | 173.86 | 0.038 0 | 99.25 |
短小染色体 细分类 | LBNet | 0.73 | 58.54 | 0.039 5 | |
| CATE-Net | 26.09 | 30.20 | 0.012 0 | 98.68 | |
| 染色体分类 | 本文框架 | 61.97 | 323.04 | 0.076 9 | 99.10 |
| 模型 | 参数量/106 | GFLOPs | 推理时间/s | 平均F1/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VGG | 138.36 | 11.69 | 0.003 0 | 91.09 |
| ResNet | 44.55 | 33.02 | 0.010 1 | 94.41 |
| DenseNet | 28.68 | 15.50 | 0.030 6 | 95.27 |
| Vision Transformer | 309.52 | 0.92 | 0.010 6 | 97.51 |
| VAN | 44.77 | 419.65 | 0.024 1 | 98.09 |
| CIR-Net | 60.19 | 49.21 | 0.021 0 | 96.25 |
| SIATE-Net | 40.36 | 30.23 | 0.131 8 | 98.37 |
| 本文框架 | 61.97 | 323.04 | 0.076 9 | 99.10 |
Tab. 12 Complexity statistics of different classification models
| 模型 | 参数量/106 | GFLOPs | 推理时间/s | 平均F1/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VGG | 138.36 | 11.69 | 0.003 0 | 91.09 |
| ResNet | 44.55 | 33.02 | 0.010 1 | 94.41 |
| DenseNet | 28.68 | 15.50 | 0.030 6 | 95.27 |
| Vision Transformer | 309.52 | 0.92 | 0.010 6 | 97.51 |
| VAN | 44.77 | 419.65 | 0.024 1 | 98.09 |
| CIR-Net | 60.19 | 49.21 | 0.021 0 | 96.25 |
| SIATE-Net | 40.36 | 30.23 | 0.131 8 | 98.37 |
| 本文框架 | 61.97 | 323.04 | 0.076 9 | 99.10 |
| [1] | 冯涛,陈斌,张跃飞. 基于改进的Mask R-CNN的染色体图像分割框架[J]. 计算机应用, 2020, 40(11): 3332-3339. |
| FENG T, CHEN B, ZHANG Y F. Chromosome image segmentation framework based on improved Mask R-CNN[J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2020, 40(11): 3332-3339. | |
| [2] | LIN C, ZHAO G, YIN A, et al. A multi-stages chromosome segmentation and mixed classification method for chromosome automatic karyotyping[C]// Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Web Information Systems and Applications, LNCS 12432. Cham: Springer, 2020: 365-376. |
| [3] | SOMASUNDARAM D, MADIAN N, GOH K M, et al. Chromosome segmentation and classification: an updated review[J]. Knowledge and Information Systems, 2025, 67(2): 977-1011. |
| [4] | ABID F, HAMAMI L. A survey of neural network based automated systems for human chromosome classification[J]. Artificial Intelligence Review, 2018, 49(1): 41-56. |
| [5] | LeCUN Y, BOSER B, DENKER J S, et al. Backpropagation applied to handwritten Zip code recognition[J]. Neural Computation, 1989, 1(4): 541-551. |
| [6] | KRIZHEVSKY A, SUTSKEVER I, HINTON G E. ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks[C]// Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems — Volume 1. Red Hook: Curran Associates Inc., 2012: 1097-1105. |
| [7] | SHARMA M, SAHA O, SRIRAMAN A, et al. Crowdsourcing for chromosome segmentation and deep classification[C]// Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops. Piscataway: IEEE, 2017: 786-793. |
| [8] | ZHANG W, SONG S, BAI T, et al. Chromosome classification with convolutional neural network based deep learning[C]// Proceedings of the 11th International Congress on Image and Signal Processing, BioMedical Engineering and Informatics. Piscataway: IEEE, 2018: 1-5. |
| [9] | HU X, YI W, JIANG L, et al. Classification of metaphase chromosomes using deep convolutional neural network[J]. Journal of Computational Biology, 2019, 26(5): 473-484. |
| [10] | LIN C, ZHAO G, YIN A, et al. MixNet: a better promising approach for chromosome classification based on aggregated residual architecture[C]// Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Computer Vision, Image and Deep Learning. Piscataway: IEEE, 2020: 313-318. |
| [11] | XIE S, GIRSHICK R, DOLLÁR P, et al. Aggregated residual transformations for deep neural networks[C]// Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Piscataway: IEEE, 2017: 5987-5995. |
| [12] | WANG C, HAN M, WU Y, et al. CNN based chromosome classification architecture for combined dataset[C]// Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Communication, Image and Signal Processing. Piscataway: IEEE, 2021: 69-74. |
| [13] | HE K, ZHANG X, REN S, et al. Deep residual learning for image recognition[C]// Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Piscataway: IEEE, 2016: 770-778. |
| [14] | HU J, SHEN L, SUN G. Squeeze-and-excitation networks[C]// Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Piscataway: IEEE, 2018: 7132-7141. |
| [15] | SHARMA M, SWATI, VIG L. Automatic chromosome classification using deep attention based sequence learning of chromosome bands[C]// Proceedings of the 2018 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks. Piscataway: IEEE, 2018: 1-8. |
| [16] | HOCHREITER S, SCHMIDHUBER J. Long short-term memory[J]. Neural Computation, 1997, 9(8): 1735-1780. |
| [17] | LIN C, ZHAO G, YANG Z, et al. CIR-Net: automatic classification of human chromosome based on Inception-ResNet architecture[J]. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, 2022, 19(3): 1285-1293. |
| [18] | SZEGEDY C, IOFFE S, VANHOUCKE V, et al. Inception-v4, Inception-ResNet and the impact of residual connections on learning[C]// Proceedings of the 31st AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Palo Alto: AAAI Press, 2017: 4278-4284. |
| [19] | 罗纯龙,赵屹. 染色体核型分析深度学习方法综述[J]. 中国图象图形学报, 2023, 28(11): 3363-3385. |
| LUO C L, ZHAO Y. Review of deep learning methods for karyotype analysis[J]. Journal of Image and Graphics, 2023, 28(11): 3363-3385. | |
| [20] | 平金如,孙子文. 特征融合的MV2-Transformer肺炎X 光图像分类模型[J]. 计算机应用, 2025, 45(12): 4030-4036. |
| PING J R, SUN Z W. Pneumonia X-ray image classification model by MV2-Transformer with feature fusion[J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2025, 45(12): 4030-4036. | |
| [21] | QIN Y, WEN J, ZHENG H, et al. Varifocal-Net: a chromosome classification approach using deep convolutional networks[J]. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 2019, 38(11): 2569-2581. |
| [22] | 彭文,林金伟. 基于空间信息关注和纹理增强的短小染色体分类方法[J]. 图学学报, 2024, 45(5): 1017-1029. |
| PENG W, LIN J W. A short chromosome classification method based on spatial attention and texture enhancement[J]. Journal of Graphics, 2024, 45(5): 1017-1029. | |
| [23] | ZHU L, JI D, ZHU S, et al. Learning statistical texture for semantic segmentation[C]// Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Piscataway: IEEE, 2021: 12532-12541. |
| [24] | McGOWAN-JORDAN J, HASTINGS T J, MOORE S. ISCN 2020: an international system for human cytogenomic nomenclature (2020) reprint of ‘cytogenetic and genome research 2020, vol. 160, no. 7-8’[M]. Basel: Karger, 2020. |
| [25] | ZHANG Y, YE M, ZHU G, et al. FFCA-YOLO for small object detection in remote sensing images[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2024, 62: No.5611215. |
| [26] | GAO G, WANG Z, LI J, et al. Lightweight bimodal network for single-image super-resolution via symmetric CNN and recursive Transformer[C]// Proceedings of the 31st International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. California: ijcai.org, 2022: 913-919. |
| [27] | DING W, CHANG L, GU C, et al. Classification of chromosome karyotype based on Faster-RCNN with the segmentation and enhancement preprocessing model[C]// Proceedings of the 12th International Congress on Image and Signal Processing, BioMedical Engineering and Informatics. Piscataway: IEEE, 2019: 1-5. |
| [28] | SWATI S, SHARMA M, VIG L. Automatic classification of low resolution chromosomal images[C]// Proceedings of the 2018 European Conference on Computer Vision Workshops, LNCS 11134. Cham: Springer, 2019: 315-325. |
| [29] | LIU X, FU L, LIN C W J, et al. SRAS-net: low-resolution chromosome image classification based on deep learning[J]. IET Systems Biology, 2022, 16(3/4): 85-97. |
| [30] | CHOLLET F. Xception: deep learning with depthwise separable convolutions[C]// Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Piscataway: IEEE, 2017: 1800-1807. |
| [31] | TAN M, LE Q V. EfficientNet: rethinking model scaling for convolutional neural networks[C]// Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Machine Learning. New York: JMLR.org, 2019: 6105-6114. |
| [32] | DONG C, LOY C C, HE K, et al. Image super-resolution using deep convolutional networks[J]. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2016, 38(2): 295-307. |
| [33] | LEDIG C, THEIS L, HUSZÁR F, et al. Photo-realistic single image super-resolution using a generative adversarial network[C]// Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Piscataway: IEEE, 2017: 105-114. |
| [34] | LAI W S, HUANG J B, AHUJA N, et al. Deep Laplacian pyramid networks for fast and accurate super-resolution[C]//Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Piscataway: IEEE, 2017: 5835-5843. |
| [35] | LIM B, SON S, KIM H, et al. Enhanced deep residual networks for single image super-resolution[C]// Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops. Piscataway: IEEE, 2017: 1132-1140. |
| [36] | SELVARAJU R R, COGSWELL M, DAS A, et al. Grad-CAM: visual explanations from deep networks via gradient-based localization[C]// Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. Piscataway: IEEE, 2017: 618-626. |
| [1] | Qianhui XU, Ke NIU, Shunzhe ZHU, Lin SHI, Jun LI. GAB3D-SEVSN: enhanced video steganography model via invertible neural network [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2026, 46(2): 467-474. |
| [2] | Jiaxiang ZHANG, Xiaoming LI, Jiahui ZHANG. Few-shot object detection algorithm based on new category feature enhancement and metric mechanism [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2025, 45(9): 2984-2992. |
| [3] | Wei ZHANG, Jiaxiang NIU, Jichao MA, Qiongxia SHEN. Chinese spelling correction model ReLM enhanced with deep semantic features [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2025, 45(8): 2484-2490. |
| [4] | Haoyu LIU, Pengwei KONG, Yaoli WANG, Qing CHANG. Pedestrian detection algorithm based on multi-view information [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2025, 45(7): 2325-2332. |
| [5] | Weichao DANG, Yinghao FAN, Gaimei GAO, Chunxia LIU. Weakly supervised action localization based on temporal and global contextual feature enhancement [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2025, 45(3): 963-971. |
| [6] | Binhong XIE, Wanyin GAO, Wangdong LU, Yingjun ZHANG, Rui ZHANG. Dense object counting network with few-shot similarity matching feature enhancement [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2025, 45(2): 403-410. |
| [7] | Haiteng MENG, Xiaole ZHAO, Tianrui LI. Lightweight image super-resolution reconstruction based on asymmetric information distillation network [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2025, 45(2): 601-609. |
| [8] | Benchen YANG, Haoran LI, Haibo JIN. Multi-focus image fusion network with cascade fusion and enhanced reconstruction [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2025, 45(2): 594-600. |
| [9] | Jing ZHOU, Zhenyang TANG, Hui DONG, Xin LIU. Multi-label text classification method of power customer service work orders integrating feature enhancement and contrastive learning [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2025, 45(12): 3847-3854. |
| [10] | Zihan LIU, Dengwen ZHOU, Yukai LIU. Image super-resolution network based on global dependency Transformer [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2024, 44(5): 1588-1596. |
| [11] | Lin GUO, Kunhu LIU, Chenyang MA, Youxue LAI, Yingfen XU. Image super-resolution reconstruction based on residual attention network with receptive field expansion [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2024, 44(5): 1579-1587. |
| [12] | Jie WANG, Hua MENG. Image classification algorithm based on overall topological structure of point cloud [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2024, 44(4): 1107-1113. |
| [13] | Xinye LI, Yening HOU, Yinghui KONG, Zhiqi YAN. Few-shot object detection combining feature fusion and enhanced attention [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2024, 44(3): 745-751. |
| [14] | Hao CHEN, Zhenping XIA, Cheng CHENG, Xing LIN-LI, Bowen ZHANG. Lightweight image super-resolution reconstruction network based on Transformer-CNN [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2024, 44(1): 292-299. |
| [15] | Jia CHEN, Hong ZHANG. Image text retrieval method based on feature enhancement and semantic correlation matching [J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2024, 44(1): 16-23. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||